Skip to main content

Stiffness Construction and Decomposition of Compliant Parallel Mechanisms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Parallel Mechanisms—Screw Theory Approach

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics ((STAR,volume 139))

Abstract

Following the conceptual design of compliant mechanisms in Chap. 5, this chapter further looks into the stiffness properties of the developed compliant parallel mechanisms. Two types of stiffness problems are investigated, including the stiffness analysis and synthesis problem. In the stiffness analysis, the reciprocal relationship between motions and wrenches is used to design the layout of constraint limbs and construct the corresponding stiffness matrix. In the stiffness synthesis, the developed stiffness matrix is decomposed to obtain the configuration of constraint limbs based on the stiffness properties of each constraint limb. Existing synthesis algorithms are compared and categorized, including the direct-recursion and matrix-partition algorithm, and it is revealed for the first time the line-vector based matrix-partition algorithm can establish a one-to-one correspondence between the synthesized result and the initial configuration used to construct the compliant parallel mechanism. This is further verified by implementing the algorithms to decompose the constraint stiffness matrix of developed compliant parallel mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhattacharya, S., Hatwal, H., Ghosh, A.: On the optimum design of stewart platform type parallel manipulators. Robotica 13(02), 133–140 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dwarakanath, T., Dasgupta, B., Mruthyunjaya, T.: Design and development of a stewart platform based force-torque sensor. Mechatronics 11(7), 793–809 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kong, X., Gosselin, C.: Type Synthesis of Parallel Mechanisms, vol. 33. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blanding, D.L.: Exact constraint: machine design using kinematic processing. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dai, J.S., Kerr, D.: A six-component contact force measurement device based on the Stewart platform. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 214(5), 687–697 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hopkins, J.B., Panas, R.M.: Design of flexure-based precision transmission mechanisms using screw theory. Precis. Eng. 37(2), 299–307 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, J.J., Li, S.Z., Qiu, C.: An analytical approach for synthesizing line actuation spaces of parallel flexure mechanisms. J. Mech. Des. 135(12), 124501–124501 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai, J.S., Rees Jones, J.: Interrelationship between screw systems and corresponding reciprocal systems and applications. Mech. Mach. Theory 36(5), 633–651 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dai, J.S., Jones, J.R.: Null–space construction using cofactors from a screw–algebra context. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 458(2024), 1845–1866 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ball, R.S.: A Treatise on the Theory of Screws. Cambridge University Press (1900)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dimentberg, F.M.: The screw calculus and its applications in mechanics. Technical report, DTIC Document (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loncaric, J.: Normal forms of stiffness and compliance matrices. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 3(6), 567–572 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, S., Schimmels, J.M.: The bounds and realization of spatial stiffnesses achieved with simple springs connected in parallel. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 14(3), 466–475 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ciblak, N., Lipkin, H.: Synthesis of cartesian stiffness for robotic applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 2147–2152. IEEE (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts, R.G.: Minimal realization of a spatial stiffness matrix with simple springs connected in parallel. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(5), 953–958 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dai, J.S., Xilun, D.: Compliance analysis of a three-legged rigidly-connected platform device. J. Mech. Des. 128(4), 755–764 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ding, X., Dai, J.S.: Characteristic equation-based dynamics analysis of vibratory bowl feeders with three spatial compliant legs. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 5(1), 164–175 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dai, J.S.: Geometrical Foundations and Screw Algebra for Mechanisms and Robotics. Higher Education Press, Beijing (2014). ISBN 9787040334838. (translated from Dai, J.S.: Screw Algebra and Kinematic Approaches for Mechanisms and Robotics. Springer, London (2016))

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ciblak, N., Lipkin, H.: Application of Stiffness Decompositions to Synthesis by Springs. ASME (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Choi, K., Jiang, S., Li, Z.: Spatial stiffness realization with parallel springs using geometric parameters. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18(3), 274–284 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, R.G., Shirey, T.: Algorithms for passive compliance mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 35th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, 2003, pp. 347–351. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, G., Wang, H., Lin, Z., Lai, X.: The principal axes decomposition of spatial stiffness matrices. IEEE Trans. Robot. 31(1), 191–207 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lipkin, H., Patterson, T.: Geometrical properties of modelled robot elasticity: Part I-decomposition. In: 1992 ASME Design Technical Conference. Scottsdale, DE, vol. 45, pp. 179–185 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, S., Schimmels, J.M.: The eigenscrew decomposition of spatial stiffness matrices. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 16(2), 146–156 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, S., Schimmels, J.M.: Minimal realizations of spatial stiffnesses with parallel or serial mechanisms having concurrent axes. J. Robotic Syst. 18(3), 135–146 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roberts, R.G.: Minimal realization of an arbitrary spatial stiffness matrix with a parallel connection of simple and complex springs. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 16(5), 603–608 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Griffis, M., Duffy, J.: Global stiffness modeling of a class of simple compliant couplings. Mech. Mach. Theory 28(2), 207–224 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ciblak, N., Lipkin, H.: Asymmetric cartesian stiffness for the modeling of compliant robotic systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Biennial ASME Mechanisms Conference, Minneapolis, MN (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Qiu, C., Zhang, K., Dai, J.S.: Constraint-based design and analysis of a compliant parallel mechanism using SMA-spring actuators. In: ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. V05AT08A035–V05AT08A035. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gosselin, C.: Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 6(3), 377–382 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, Y., Xu, Q.: Stiffness analysis for a 3-PUU parallel kinematic machine. Mech. Mach. Theory 43(2), 186–200 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dai, J.S., Jones, J.R.: A linear algebraic procedure in obtaining reciprocal screw systems. J. Robotic Syst. 20(7), 401–412 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ciblak, N.: Analysis of cartesian stiffness and compliance with applications (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts, R.G.: Note on the normal form of a spatial stiffness matrix. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 17(6), 968–972 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ciblak, N., Lipkin, H.: Orthonormal isotropic vector bases. In: Proceedings of DETC, vol. 98. Citeseer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Geng, Z.J., Haynes, L.S.: A 3-2-1 kinematic configuration of a Stewart platform and its application to six degree of freedom pose measurements. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 11(1), 23–34 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Qiu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Qiu, C., Dai, J.S. (2021). Stiffness Construction and Decomposition of Compliant Parallel Mechanisms. In: Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Parallel Mechanisms—Screw Theory Approach. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 139. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48313-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics