Skip to main content

The Development of DISC (Decision Integration for Strong Communities): An Agile Software Application of Sustainability Indicators for Small and Rural Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being ((CQLWB))

Abstract

Small towns and rural communities, like many larger cities, are looking for ways to strengthen their economies, improve quality of life, and build on local assets. They are seeking to create their own path to sustainability that fits their size, geography, and resources and also preserves their distinctive characteristics. To address this need, the Decision Integration for Strong Communities (DISC) application was developed to offer relevant information curated to assist smaller communities with addressing their sustainability goals. To ensure DISC is useful to a variety of smaller and rural communities, EPA project staff reached out to small numbers of interested communities and potential users at different steps of the development process. In late 2019, the DISC application was beta tested by potential users and is now downloadable upon request to collaborating communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACS (American Community Survey). (2015). United States Census. American Community Survey. https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/2015/.

  • Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2017). Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9, 146–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L., Smith, J. L., & Wright, P. A. (2015). Where are poor people to live?: Transforming public housing communities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, M., Ogievetsky, V., Heer, J. (2011). D3 data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2301–2309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstin, H., Leatherman, S., & Goldman, D. (2016). The evolution of healthcare quality measurement in the United States. Journal of Internal Medicine, 279, 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2019). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Cheltenham, England: Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). (2019). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system: Survey data & documentation. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_documentation/index.htm.

  • Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J., & Purvis, L. (2018). Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2336–2350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., Gertler, M. S., & Wojcik, D. (2018). The new oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., & Ford, D. (2003). Introducing an agile process to an organization. IEEE Computer. http://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/articles/introducing-an-agile-process-to-an-organization.

  • Congress of the New Urbanism. (1999). Charter of the new urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A. (2001). At the edge: Sustainable development in the 21st century. Vancouver, British Columbia: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, D. (2002). Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingsoyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. The Journal of Systems and Software, 85, 1213–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douthit, N., Kiv, S., Dwolatzky, T., & Biswas, S. (2015). Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health, 129, 6011–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffin, E. (2019). Number of U.S. cities, town villages by population size 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/241695/number-of-us-cities-towns-villages-by-population-size/.

  • Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M. (2017). Does race affect access to governmental services? An experiment exploring street-level bureaucrats and access to public housing. American Journal of Political Science, 61, 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. H., & Abdi, S. M. (2017). Building community resilience to violent extremism through genuine partnerships. American Psychologist, 72, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flumerfelt, S., Siriban-Manalang, A. B., & Kahlen, F. (2012). Are agile and lean manufacturing systems employing sustainability, complexity and organizational learning? The Learning Organization, 19, 238–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulford, R. S., Smith, L. M., Harwell, M., Dantin, D., Russell, M., & Harvey, J. (2015). Human well-being differs by community type: Toward reference points in a human well-being indicator useful for decision making. Ecological Indicators, 56, 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulgram, C., Johnson, J., Crandall, M., Jackson, L., & Burrows, N. (2011). The FBI gets agile. IT Professional, 13, 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewegen, P. P., van der Berg, A. E., de Vries, S., & Verheij, R. A. (2006). Vitamin G: Effect of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Public Health, 6, 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning, shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke, England: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, M. D., Meyer, M. A., Gharaibeh, N. G., Van Zandt, S., Masterson, J., Cooper, J. T., Jr., et al. (2018). The development of a participatory assessment technique for infrastructure: Neighborhood-level monitoring towards sustainable infrastructure systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, E., Babar, M. A., Paik, H. Y., & Verner, J. (2009). Risk identification and mitigation processes for using scrum in global software development: A conceptual framework. 16th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference 2009, pp. 457–464. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, E., Bannerman, P. L., & Jeffery, D. R. (2011). Scrum practices in global software development: A research framework. International conference on product focused software process improvement. 2011, pp. 88–102. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husar, R., & Poirot, R. (2005). DataFed and Fastnet: Tools for agile air quality analysis. Environmental Manager, 2005, 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioppolo, G., Cucurachi, S., Salomone, R., Saija, G., & Shi, L. (2016). Sustainable local development and environmental governance: A strategic planning experience. Sustainability, 8, 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2008). Development practices for small software applications. CrossTalk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 21, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koirala, B. P., Koliou, E., Hakvoort, R. A., & Herder, P. M. (2016). Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 722–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. L., & Wright, A. (2001). Rule-based classification systems using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 1137–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, C., Hanna, K., & Dale, A. (2009). A template for integrated community sustainability planning. Environmental Management, 44, 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, A., Coelho, P., Subtil, E., & Ramos, T. B. (2010). The role of common local indicators in regional sustainability assessment. Ecological Indicators, 10, 646–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with nature. Garden City, NY: The Nature History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 516–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, M. (2010). Adapting configuration management for agile teams: Balancing sustainability and speed. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northern, C., Mayfield, K., Benito, R., & Casagni, M. (2010). Handbook for implementing agile in department of defense information technology acquisition (Technical Report No. MTR-100489). MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a546756.pdf.

  • Paetsch, F., Eberlein, A., & Maurer, F. (2003). Requirements engineering and agile software development. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp. 308–313. IEEE The Computer Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandeya, B., Buytaert, W., Zulkafli, Z., Karpouzoglou, T., Mao, F., & Hannah, D. M. (2016). A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scare regions. Ecosystem Services, 22, 250–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D. G., & Dougill, A. J. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics, 59, 406–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Register, R. (2006). Ecocities: rebuilding cities in balance with nature (Revised ed.). Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. C., Williams, L., Maximilien, E. M. (2007). On the sustained use of a test-driven development practice at IBM. In Proceedings of Agile 2007, Washington, D.C., pp. 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman, P. (1993). Landscape ecology and countryside planning—Vision, theory, and practice. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisneros-Kidd, A. M., Monz, C., Hausner, V., Schmidt, J., & Clark, D. (2019). Nature-based tourism, resource dependence and resilience in Arctic communities: Framing complex issues in a changing environment. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27, 12259–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. M., Case, J. L., Harwell, L. C., Smith, H. M., & Summers, J. K. (2013). Development of relative importance values as contribution weights for evaluating human well-being: An ecosystem services example. Human Ecology, 41, 631–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. K., Smith, L. M., Harwell, L. C., Case, J. L., Wade, C. M., Straub, K. R., et al. (2014). An index of human well-being for the U.S.: A trio approach. Sustainability, 6, 3915–3935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. K., Harwell, L. C., & Smith, L. M. (2016). A model for change: An approach for forecasting well-being from service-based decisions. Ecological Indicators, 69, 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. K., Smith, L. M., Harwell, L. C., & Buck, K. D. (2017). Conceptualizing holistic community resilience to climate events: Foundation for a climate resilience screening index. GeoHealth, 1, 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. K., Harwell, L. C., Smith, L. M., & Buck, K. D. (2018). Measuring community resilience to natural hazards: The Natural Hazard Resilience Screening Index (NaHRSI)—Development and application to the United States. GeoHealth, 2, 372–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiault, L., Marshall, P., Gelcich, S., Collin, A., Chlous, F., & Claudet, J. (2018). Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making. Conservation Biology, 32, 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippet, J. (2005). Participatory planning in river catchments, an innovative toolkit tested in South Africa and North West England. Water Science Technology, 52, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Kitzes, J., Moran, D., Goldfinger, S., & Thoman, M. (2006). The Ecological Footprint of cities and regions: Comparing resource availability with resource demand. Environment and Urbanisation, 18, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2011). The combination of agile and lean in software development: An experience report analysis. 2011 Agile Conference, pp. 1–9. IEEE, 2011. https://ulir.ul.ie/bitstream/handle/10344/1705/2011_Wang.pdf?sequence=2.

  • Wang, X., Conboy, K., & Cawley, O. (2012). “Leagile” software development: An experience report analysis of the application of lean approaches in agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85, 1287–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wates, N. (2000). The community planning handbook. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayland, R. A, Dye, T. S. (2005). AIRNOW: America’s Resource for Real-Time and Forecasted Air Quality Information; Environmental Manager, pp. 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrubel, E., & Gross, J. (2015). Contracting for Agile Software Development in the Department of Defense: An introduction. Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-2015-TN-006. Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1046628.pdf.

  • Zubizarreta, I., Seravalli A., & Arrizabalaga, S. (2015). Smart city concept: What it is and what it should be. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000282.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the following for their contributions to the successful development and execution of the DISC downloadable application.

EPA Region 10: Bruce Duncan, Karl Pepple, Charles Bert

EPA ORD: Melissa McCullough, Kurt Wolfe, Rajbir Parmar, Lisa Smith

ORISE/ORAU at EPA ORD: Vivian Phan, Seth Jenkins, Connor Thorson, Courtney McMillion, Paul Dunken, Kristi Swisher

EPA OCR: Alexis Rourk, Stephanie Bertaina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Summers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Any mention of trade names, products, or services does not imply an endorsement by the U.S. Government or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA does not endorse any commercial products, services, or enterprises.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Summers, K., Salazar, V., Olszyk, D., Harwell, L., Brookes, A. (2020). The Development of DISC (Decision Integration for Strong Communities): An Agile Software Application of Sustainability Indicators for Small and Rural Communities. In: Ridzi, F., Stevens, C., Davern, M. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators. Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48182-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48182-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48181-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48182-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics