Skip to main content

Data-Driven Decision Making and Community Indicators: Towards an Integration of DDDM in Community Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Quality-of-Life Indicators

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being ((CQLWB))

  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a framework for better contextualizing the concept of integrating more data-driven decision making (DDDM) in community development. We relate DDDM to its use in other fields, specifically Business Management and Educational Studies. From the field of Educational Studies, we develop a series of questions that may be considered to support the still developing epistemology of DDDM in community development. We then, situate DDDM firmly within the toolbox of planning and planning history in the US. As such, we utilize and compare a few planning methods to support better understanding of what DDDM is and what it is not. We then present our recommendation that DDDM can be addressed, through the adoption and development of community indicator programs. Community indicator programs are an excellent tool to connect different forms of knowledge with different forms of action for enhanced community development practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auffrey, C. (2017). Strengthening communities with neighborhood data, by G. Thomas Kingsley, Claudia J. Coulton, and Kathryn L. S. Pettit. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(4), 590–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basolo, V. (2000). City spending on economic development versus affordable housing: Does inter-city competition or local politics drive decisions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D. (1953). Equivalent comparisons of experiments. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 24(2), 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. & Hellen Kim, H. (2011). Strength in numbers: how does data-driven decisionmaking affect firm performance?. SSRN, pp. 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro, R. (1974). The power broker. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalal-Clayton, B., & Bass, S. (2002). Sustainable development strategies. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, N. D., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2019). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dannenberg, A., Frumkin, H., & Jackson, R. (Eds.). (2011). Making healthy places. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA. (2014). Partnership for sustainable communities: Five years of learning from communities and coordinating federal investments. Washington, DC: EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. (2003). New directions in planning theory. In S. Campbell & S. Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 173–195). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2003). Towards a non-euclidian mode of planning. In S. Campbell & S. Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 75–80). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, L., Grieve, M., & Goldstein, I. (2015). Investing in community change: An evaluation of a decade of data-driven grantmaking. The Foundation Review, 7(3), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harger, J., & Meyer, F. (1996). Definition of indicators for environmentally sustainable development. Chemosphere, 33(9), 1749–1775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M. (1999). Guide to sustainable community indicators, s.l.: Hart environmental data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. (2003). The communicative turn in planning theory. In S. Campbell & S. Fainstein (Eds.), Reading in planning theory (pp. 237–255). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, F. (1913). The remaking of the American City. Harper’s Monthly Magazine, July, Vol. 127, pp. 186–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S., Nusser, S., Shipp, S., & Woteki, C. (2018). Helping communities use data to make better decisions. Issues in Science & Technology, 34(3), 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. (2016). Functional sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators, 66, 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L., & Lowe, J. (2018). We want to do it differently: Resisting gentrification in Houston’s Northern Third Ward. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(8), 1161–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T., & McArdle, G. (2015). Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Piety, P. (2007). Introduction: Evidence and decision making. In P. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 1–14). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. (1997). Anchor points for planning's identification. Journal of Planning Education and Research ,16(3), 223–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, D., & Tsao, H. (2006). A new way of revitalizing distressed urban communities? Assessing the impact of the federal empowerment program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(5), pp. 443–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J., & Joseph, R. (2017). Data-driven decision making: A primer for beginners. Northeastern University Blog, 14 December, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C., deBois, M., Hamberg, R., & Baldwin, J. (2018). Community indicators project development guide. Retrieved from https://communityindicators.net/ciguide/ on July 2, 2019.

  • Teitz, M. B. (1996). American planning in the 1990s: Evolution, debate and challenge. Urban Studies, 33(4–5), 649–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R., & Rosentraub, M. (2016). Information, space, and the control of local decision. Journal of Urban Affairs, 8(4), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Abraham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abraham, D. (2020). Data-Driven Decision Making and Community Indicators: Towards an Integration of DDDM in Community Development. In: Ridzi, F., Stevens, C., Davern, M. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators. Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48182-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48182-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48181-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48182-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics