Skip to main content

A 65-Year-Old Man with Poor Cancer Pain Control Despite Intrathecal Pump

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Chronic Pain Management
  • 961 Accesses

Abstract

Cancer is a public healthcare problem and is the second leading cause of death in the United States. Cancer pain occurs in varying degrees depending on the disease stage, type of cancer, and location where 75% of cancer patients will complain of pain at some stage of their disease (Bao et al., Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD011108, 2016). Intrathecal pump (ITP) was first reported as an effective cancer pain treatment modality in 1981 (Onofrio et al., Mayo Clin Proc 56(8):516–520, 1981; Wang et al., Anesthesiology 50(2):149–151, 1979). Advances in technology over the past 30 years have rendered ITP as an effective modality for treating intractable cancer pain; however, this modality requires sufficient knowledge and expertise for implantation and management. We will discuss some of the important aspects of ITP therapy in cancer pain patients, factors to consider in case of poor pain control in previously stable patients with ITP therapy thus avoiding long-term serious complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bao YJ, et al. Hydromorphone for cancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD011108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Onofrio BM, Yaksh TL, Arnold PG. Continuous low-dose intrathecal morphine administration in the treatment of chronic pain of malignant origin. Mayo Clin Proc. 1981;56(8):516–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang JK, Nauss LA, Thomas JE. Pain relief by intrathecally applied morphine in man. Anesthesiology. 1979;50(2):149–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neufeld NJ, Elnahal SM, Alvarez RH. Cancer pain: a review of epidemiology, clinical quality and value impact. Future Oncol. 2017;13(9):833–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaksh TL, Rudy TA. Analgesia mediated by a direct spinal action of narcotics. Science. 1976;192(4246):1357–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith TJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial of an implantable drug delivery system compared with comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer pain: impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(19):4040–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stearns LJ, et al. Health services utilization and payments in patients with cancer pain: a comparison of intrathecal drug delivery vs conventional medical management. Neuromodulation. 2016;19(2):196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Onofrio BM, Yaksh TL. Long-term pain relief produced by intrathecal morphine infusion in 53 patients. J Neurosurg. 1990;72(2):200–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winkelmuller M, Winkelmuller W. Long-term effects of continuous intrathecal opioid treatment in chronic pain of nonmalignant etiology. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(3):458–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pucks-Faes E, et al. Eleven years’ experience with intrathecal baclofen – complications, risk factors. Brain Behav. 2018;8(5):e00965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deer TR. A prospective analysis of intrathecal granuloma in chronic pain patients: a review of the literature and report of a surveillance study. Pain Physician. 2004;7(2):225–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duarte RV, et al. Intrathecal granuloma formation as result of opioid delivery: systematic literature review of case reports and analysis against a control group. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(6):577–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shields DC, et al. Extramedullary intrathecal catheter granuloma adherent to the conus medullaris presenting as cauda equina syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(5):1059–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Motta F, Antonello CE. Analysis of complications in 430 consecutive pediatric patients treated with intrathecal baclofen therapy: 14-year experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13(3):301–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleinmann B, Wolter T. Intrathecal opioid therapy for non-malignant chronic pain: a long-term perspective. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(7):719–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Malik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malik, T. (2020). A 65-Year-Old Man with Poor Cancer Pain Control Despite Intrathecal Pump. In: Malik, T. (eds) Practical Chronic Pain Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46675-6_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46675-6_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46674-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46675-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics