Skip to main content

Ultrasound

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The use of skin ultrasound (US) in dermatology practice has been increasing in the last decades. Thanks to the development of new devices based on high (17–22 MHz) and ultra-high (70–100 MHz) frequencies that allow the visualization of epidermal architecture, dermal, and hypodermal structures reaching the external muscularis fascia. US devices based on medium frequency (5–8 MHz) rest the first choice for emergency department/internal medicine use. A series of skin conditions in which the diagnosis can be challenging from a clinical point of view show peculiar features on US examination: exemplificative cases commonly encountered in dermatological daily practice are discussed here. Using either medium frequency US (MFUS) or high frequency US (HFUS), or both, add several advantages: noninvasive differential diagnosis of these conditions is realized in a fast and not painful way; lesional area can be defined in dimension, content, vascularization, and relationship with surrounding tissues; the effect and efficacy of a specific treatment can be monitored and validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wortsman A. Ultrasound in dermatology: why, how, and when? Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2013;34(3):177–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Polańska A, et al. Current applications of high-frequency ultrasonography in dermatology. Adv Dermatol Allergol. 2017;34(6):535–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ulrich J, et al. Sonographic diagnostics in dermatology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014;12:1083–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandava A, Ravuri P, Konathan R. High-resolution ultrasound imaging of cutaneous lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013;23(3):269.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatt KD, Tambe SA, Jerajani HR, Dhurat RS. Utility of high-frequency ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant skin tumors. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017;83(2):162–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wortsman X. Common applications of dermatologic sonography. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(1):97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crisan M, Crisan D, Sannino G, et al. Ultrasonographic staging of cutaneous malignant tumors: an ultrasonographic depth index. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013;305(4):305–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bobadilla F, Wortsman X, Muñoz C, et al. Pre-surgical high resolution ultrasound of facial basal cell carcinoma: correlation with histology. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8:163–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wortsman X. Sonography of the primary cutaneous melanoma: a review. Radiol Res Pract. 2012:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lassau N, et al. Prognostic value of angiogenesis evaluated with high-frequency and colour Doppler sonography for preoperative assessment of primary cutaneous melanomas: correlation with recurrence after a 5 year follow-up period. Cancer Imaging. 2006;6:24–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Saba L, et al. Non-invasive vascular imaging in perforator flap surgery. Acta Radiol. 2013;54(1):89–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ibrahim RM, et al. Color Doppler ultrasonography targeted reconstruction using Pedicled perforator flaps—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Plast Surg. 2018;41(5):495–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stigall LE, et al. The Paramidline forehead flap: a clinical and microanatomic study. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(6):764–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karsidag S, et al. Single-stage Ala Nasi reconstruction: lateral nasal artery perforator flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(6):1887–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cammarota T, Pinto F, Magliaro A, Sarno A. Current uses of diagnostic high-frequency US in dermatology. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27(2):S215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tognetti L, Cinotti E, Fiorani D, Rubegni P, Perrot JL. Non invasive diagnosis of liquefied gouty tophus: reflectance confocal microscopy as an alternative to polarizing light microscopy analysis. Skin Res Technol. 2018;25(2):240–1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wortsman X, Moreno C, Soto R, Arellano J, Pezo C, Wortsman J. Ultrasound in-depth characterization and staging of hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:1835–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nazzaro G, Passoni E, Muratori S, et al. Comparison of clinical and sonographic scores in hidradenitis suppurativa and proposal of a novel ultrasound scoring system. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Oct 4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Caposiena Caro RD, Solivetti FM, Bianchi L. Power Doppler ultrasound assessment of vascularization in hidradenitis suppurativa lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017; epub.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Raju BI, et al. Quantitative ultrasonic methods for characterization of skin lesions in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(6):825–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Knobler R, Moinzadeh P, Hunzelmann N, et al. European dermatology forum S1 guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, part 1: localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:1401–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tognetti L, Cinotti E, Perrot JL, Neri G, Pianigiani E, Fimiani M, Rubegni P. Preliminary experience of the use of high-resolution skin ultrasound for the evaluation of extrathyroidal manifestations of Graves’ disease and response to UVA-1 phototherapy. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2019;35(2):129–31.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tognetti L, Cinotti E, Tonini G, Habougit C, Cambazard F, Rubegni P, Perrot JL. New findings in non-invasive imaging of cutaneous endometriosis: Dermoscopy, high-frequency ultrasound and reflectance confocal microscopy. Skin Res Technol. 2018;24(2):309–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tognetti L, Filippou G, Bertrando S, Picerno V, Buonocore G, Frediani B, Fimiani M, Rubegni P. Subcutaneous fat necrosis in a newborn after brief therapeutic hypothermia: ultrasonographic examination. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015;32(3):427–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tognetti, L. et al. (2020). Ultrasound. In: Fimiani, M., Rubegni, P., Cinotti, E. (eds) Technology in Practical Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45351-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45351-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45350-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45351-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics