Skip to main content

Beyond Priority

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Real, Mechanical, Experimental

Abstract

On August 28, 1686, the manuscript of Newton’s Principia was presented to the Royal Society. The book was dedicated to the Society, and the fellows “were so very sensible of the Great Honour” that they considered printing the book at the Society’s expenses. According to Halley’s account, one fellow was less enthusiast than others about that “incomparable treatise.” “Mr Hooke,” Halley wrote to Newton, “has some pretentions upon the inventions of ye rule of the decrease of Gravity, being the square of the distances from the Center.” A controversy between the two men soon sparked. Hooke, on the one hand, acknowledged that only Newton successfully demonstrated how gravity leads to the elliptic orbits of planets. He claimed that Newton adopted “the notion” of the inverse square law from him, and expected to be mentioned in the preface of that “incomparable treatise.” Newton, on the other hand, refused that claim altogether. He countered that he knew the inverse square law long before he discussed it with Hooke, who probably had it from Wren and Borelli. For this reason, his name was mentioned in the System of the World along those of the other two scholars. Newton would concede nothing more.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Guicciardini (2018), 147.

  2. 2.

    Newton (1959–1977), vol. II, 431.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., vol. II, 433–7; Id. (1999), 452; Id, (1779–85), vol. I, 51.

  4. 4.

    Patterson (1949), 334; Id. (1950), 33–4.

  5. 5.

    Koyré (1968), 234–5, 253–4; see also Fiocca (1998), 52–7.

  6. 6.

    Trinity College Library, Cambridge, MS. 0.11a.1/16; cf. Pugliese (1989), 200.

  7. 7.

    Nauenberg (1994), 332; Id. (1998), 92; Id. (2005), 523; Id. (2006), 7–8.

  8. 8.

    Birch (1756–57), vol. IV, 347.

  9. 9.

    Erlichson (1997), 170–1, 182–3; Gal and Chen Morris (2006), 55.

  10. 10.

    Bennett (1989), 229; Lohne (1960), 19; Gal (2002), 9.

  11. 11.

    Newton (1756–77), vol. II, 313.

  12. 12.

    Hooke (1674), 28; Id. (1705), 185.

  13. 13.

    Newton (1956–77), vol. II, 437.

  14. 14.

    Bouillau (1645), 3–7, 21–4; Applebaum (1996), 460; Wilson (1970), 107.

  15. 15.

    Gal (2002), 169–70, 200–1; Id. (2005), 532; Gal and Chen Morris (2006), 50–4.

  16. 16.

    Borelli (1666), 32.

  17. 17.

    Hooke (1705), 114, 132.

  18. 18.

    Gal (2006), 45; Gal and Chen Morris (2005), 391–2, 397.

  19. 19.

    Newton (1956–77), vol. I: 297–303; Gal (2002), 171–2; Whiteside (1970), 10–1; Westfall (1971), 352, 358–60.

  20. 20.

    Guicciardini (2011), 62–4; Whiteside (1991), 20; Casini (1997), 204.

  21. 21.

    Newton (1777–85), vol. I, 453, 454–7; vol. II, 633–5, 791; Id. (1999), 784,786–8, 815–6, 939; see also Bertoloni Meli (2006a), 324–9; Westfall (1972a), 186–7; Ducheyne (2012), 120, 125.

  22. 22.

    Huygens (1888–1950), vol. XXI, 458, 471.

  23. 23.

    Gal (2002), 18; Guicciardini (2005), 512.

  24. 24.

    Bertoloni Meli (2006a), 219–20; Westfall (1972b), 485.

  25. 25.

    Birch (1756–57), vol. II, 188; Hooke (1705), 546.

  26. 26.

    Hooke (1678), 228, 247.

  27. 27.

    Id. (1674), 6.

  28. 28.

    Bertoloni Meli (2006a), 219–20; Westfall (1972b), 458; Westfall (1971), 268, 270–1; Ducheyne (2012), 147.

  29. 29.

    Koyré (1968), 232–3; Aiton (1972), 97.

  30. 30.

    Van Helden (1974), 56–7; see Hooke (1665), 246; Id. (1705), 85–6, 91–2.

  31. 31.

    Hooke (1705), 88, 177.

  32. 32.

    Newton (1956–77), vol. II, 446.

  33. 33.

    Guicciardini (2009), 27.

  34. 34.

    Trinity College Library, Cambridge, Ms. 0.11a.1/16.

  35. 35.

    For example Boas (1952), 521 and Janiak (2008), 6–7.

  36. 36.

    Henry (1992), 202–3; Machamer, McGuire, and Kochiras (2012), 374.

  37. 37.

    Newton (1962), 400–1.

  38. 38.

    Westfall (1971), 413; Home (1985), 107.

  39. 39.

    Cambridge University Library MS 3970, f. 473r.

  40. 40.

    Henry (1989), 156; Westfall (1983), 219.

  41. 41.

    Newton (1956–77), vol. I, 368; vol. II, 229.

  42. 42.

    Id. (1962), 407.

  43. 43.

    Henry (2011), 20.

  44. 44.

    Hall (1998), 56–7.

  45. 45.

    Henry (1986), 344.

  46. 46.

    Westfall (1970), 91; Id. (1971), 364.

  47. 47.

    Newton (1956–77), vol. I, 364–6.

  48. 48.

    Bertoloni Meli (2006b), 321, Guicciardini (2011), 129; Ducheyne (2012), 38.

  49. 49.

    Kochiras (2008), 39–41; Bertoloni Meli (2005), 539; Whiteside (1991), 21–2.

  50. 50.

    Westfall (1970), 93; Id. (1971), 426–30; Guicciardini (1998), 32.

  51. 51.

    Whiteside (1970), 13.

  52. 52.

    Newton (1956–77), vol. II, 307, 309.

  53. 53.

    Cambridge University Library MS 4004, f. 103r-v.

  54. 54.

    Newton (1955–77), vol. II, 337–8, 341; Guicciardini (2011), 129.

  55. 55.

    Cambridge University Library MS 3965, f. 613r; cf. Ruffner (2000), 262–3.

  56. 56.

    Whiteside (1970), 14.

  57. 57.

    Ducheyne (2014), 692–3; Kochiras (2009), 276.

  58. 58.

    Hall (1998), 59; Home (1993), 197–9.

  59. 59.

    Henry (1986), 348; Kochiras (2008), 134 n. 304.

  60. 60.

    Newton (1779–85), vol. IV, 224.

  61. 61.

    Ibid., 226–7; cf. Mamiani and Trucco (1991), 87–95.

  62. 62.

    Newton (1692), 256–7.

  63. 63.

    Newton (1779–85), vol. IV, 242–51.

  64. 64.

    Westfall (1971), 378.

  65. 65.

    Hauksbee (1706–07), 2223.

  66. 66.

    Westfall (1971), 348; Id. (1983), 746.

  67. 67.

    Newton (1962), 400.

  68. 68.

    Id. (1779–85), vol. IV, 251–63.

  69. 69.

    Westfall (1971), 384, 412 n.142.

  70. 70.

    Home (1981), 24, 32; Schofield (1970), 67.

  71. 71.

    Guerlac (1977), 108.

  72. 72.

    Id. (1967), 46–8; Id. (1977), 110, 117; Home (1985), 102.

  73. 73.

    Hauksbee (1719), 55–7, 238–9; cf. Heilbron (1979), 234, 237–8.

  74. 74.

    Hauksbee (1719), 99–100, 200–1, 202, 204, 208.

  75. 75.

    Cf. Newton (1959–77), vol. I, 416.

Bibliography

  • Aiton, Eric. 1972. The vortex theory of planetary motion. London: Mcdonald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, Wilbur. 1996. Keplerian astronomy after Kepler. History of Science 34: 451–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jim. 1989. Magnetical philosophy and astronomy from Wilkins to Hooke. In Planetary astronomy from the renaissance to the rise of astrophysics, part A: Tycho Brahe to Newton, ed. R. Taton and C. Wilson, 222–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2005. Who is afraid of centrifugal force? Early Science and Medicine 10: 535–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006a. Thinking with objects: The transformation of mechanics in the seventeenth century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006b. Inherent and centrifugal forces in Newton. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 60: 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, Thomas. 1756–1957. The history of the Royal Society of London, 4 vols. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, Marie. 1952. The establishment of the mechanical philosophy. Osiris 10: 412–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borelli, Giovanni Alfonso. 1666. Theoricae mediceorum planetarum. Florence: Ex Typographia S.M.D.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulliau, Ismaël. 1645. Astronomia philolaica. Paris: Simeonis Piget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casini, Paolo. 1997. “Magis amica veritas”: Newton e Descartes. Rivista di filosofia 88: 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducheyne, Steffen. 2012. The main business of natural philosophy: Isaac Newton’s natural philosophical methodology. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Newton on action at a distance. Journal of the History of Philosophy 52: 675–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlichson, Herman. 1997. Hooke’s September 1685 ellipse vertices construction and Newton’s instantaneous impulse construction. Historia Mathematica 24: 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiocca, Alessandra. 1998. The southern deviation of freely falling bodies: From Robert Hooke’s hypothesis to Edwin Hall’s experiment (1679–1902). Physis 35: 51–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer. 2002. Meanest foundations and nobler superstructures: Hooke, Newton and the “compounding of the celestial motions of the planetts”. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The invention of celestial mechanics. Early Science and Medicine 10: 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2005. The archaeology of the inverse square law: (1) metaphysical images and mathematical practices. History of Science 43: 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The archaeology of the inverse square law: (2) the use and non-use of mathematics. History of Science 44: 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerlac, Henry. 1967. Newton’s optical aether. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 22: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Essays and papers in the history of modern science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guicciardini, Niccolò. 1998. Newton: un filosofo della natura e il sistema del mondo. Milan: Le Scienze.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Reconsidering the Hooke-Newton debate on gravitation: Recent results. Early Science and Medicine 10: 511–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Isaac Newton on mathematical certainty and method. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guicciardini, Niccoló. 2011. Newton. Rome: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Isaac Newton and natural philosophy. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Alfred Rupert. 1998. Isaac Newton and the aerial nitre. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 52: 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauksbee, Francis. 1706–07. An experiment made at Gresham College. Philosophical Transactions 25: 2223–2224.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1709. Physico-mechanical experiments on various subjects. London: Printed by R. Brugis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1719. Physico-mechanical experiments on various subjects. London: Printed for J. Senex; and W. Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, John. 1979. Electricity in the 17th and 18th centuries. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, John. 1986. Occult qualities and the experimental philosophy: Active principles in pre-Newtonian matter theory. History of Science 24: 335–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Robert Hooke, the incongruous mechanist. In Robert Hooke: New studies, ed. Michael Hunter and Simon Schaffer, 149–180. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The scientific revolution in England. In The scientific revolution in national context, ed. Roy Porter and Mikuláš Teich, 178–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Gravity and De gravitatione: The development of Newton’s ideas on action at a distance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home, Roderick. 1981. The effluvial theory of electricity. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Force, electricity, and the powers of the living matter in Newton’s mature philosophy of nature. In Religion, science and worldview: Essays in honor of Richard S. Westfall, ed. Margaret Osler and Paul Lawrence Farber, 95–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Newton’s subtle matter: The Opticks queries and the mechanical philosophy. In Renaissance and revolution: Humanists, scholars, craftsmen and natural philosophers in early modern Europe, ed. J.V. Field and Frank A. James, 193–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooke, Robert. 1674. An attempt to prove the motion of the earth by observations. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1705. Posthumous works, ed. Richard Waller. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huygens, Christiaan. 1888–1950. Oeuvres completes, 22 vols., ed. Société hollandaise des sciences. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiak, Andrew. 2008. Newton as philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochiras, Hylarie. 2008. Force, matter, and metaphysics in Newton’s natural philosophy. Phd Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Gravity and Newton’s substance counting problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40: 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, Alexandre. 1968. Newtonian studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohne, Johs. 1960. Hooke versus Newton: An analysis of the documents in the case of free fall and planetary motion. Centaurus 7: 6–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, Peter, J.E. McGuire, and Hylarie Kochiras. 2012. Newton and the mechanical philosophy: Gravitation as the balance of the heavens. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 50: 370–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamiani, Maurizio, and Emanuela Trucco. 1991. Newton e i fenomeni della vita. Nuncius 6: 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauenberg, Michael. 1994. Hooke, orbital motion and Newton’s Principia. American Journal of Physics 62: 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. On Hooke’s 1685 manuscript on orbital mechanics. Historia Mathematica 25: 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Hooke’s and Newton’s contributions to the early development of orbital dynamics and the theory of universal gravitation. Early Science and Medicine 10: 518–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Robert Hooke’s seminal contribution to orbital dynamics. In Robert Hooke: Tercentennial studies, ed. Michael Cooper and Michael Hunter, 3–32. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac. 1779–85. Opera quae extant omnia, 5 vols., ed. Samuel Horsley, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1959–77. The correspondence of Isaac Newton, 7 vols., ed. H. W. Turnbull, J. F. Scott, A. R. Hall and L. Tilling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. In Unpublished scientific papers, ed. Alfred Rupert Hall and Marie Boas Hall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. In The Principia: Mathematical principles of natural philosophy, ed. I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Louise Diehl. 1949. Hooke’s gravitation theory and its influence on Newton I: Hooke’s gravitation theory. Isis 40: 327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1950. Hooke’s gravitation theory and its influence on Newton II: The insufficiency of the traditional estimate. Isis 41: 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, Patri. 1989. Robert Hooke and the dynamics of motion in a curved path. In Robert Hooke: New studies, ed. Michael Hunter and Simon Schaffer, 181–205. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffner, James. 2000. Newton’s propositions on comets: Steps in transition, 1681–1684. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 54: 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, Robert. 1970. Mechanism and materialism: British natural philosophy in the age of reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Helden, Albert. 1974. The telescope in the seventeenth century. Isis 65: 38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, Richard. 1970. Uneasy fitful reflections on fits of easy transmission. In The annus mirabilis of Isaac Newton 1666–1966, ed. Robert Palter, 88–104. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. Force in Newton’s physics: The science of dynamics in the seventeenth century. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972a. Circular motion in the seventeenth mechanics. Isis 63: 184–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972b. Robert Hooke (1635–1703). In Dictionary of scientific biography, ed. Charles Gillispie, vol. VI, 481–488. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. Never at rest: A biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, Derek. 1970. Before the Principia: The maturing of Newon’s thoughts on dynamical astronomy, 1664–1684. Journal for the History of Astronomy 1: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The prehistory of the Principia from 1664 to 1686. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 54: 11–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Curtis. 1970. From Kepler’s laws, so-called, to universal gravitation: Empirical factors. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 6: 89–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sacco, F.G. (2020). Beyond Priority. In: Real, Mechanical, Experimental. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44451-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44451-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44450-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44451-8

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics