Skip to main content

Bridging DH and Humanistic HCI

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Digital Communities (iConference 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12051))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Bowker’s Age of Potential Memory describes a new era characterized by a culture of knowledge production that fosters and stifles certain forms of statements depending on the logics that subtend them. Through processes of ubiquitous data collection, analysis, and feedback, individuals are increasingly reduced to users; users are re-created as data doubles or data doppelgangers, post hoc, through the aggregation and analysis of their data traces. This discursive transformation of the human that will arise in relation to living alongside and through these doubles or doppelgangers is difficult to understand within the framework of extant disciplinary silos. And yet methods that connect disciplines are emerging. To realize these connections, translational work is required. This paper explores the complementarity of digital humanities (DH) and humanistic human-computer interaction (hHCI) through the lens of distant reading. I focus on distant reading—topic modelling in particular—because of its methodological popularity and relation to discourse. I argue that distant reading comprises a useful connection between these two young domains: a pivot that allows for the inter- or transdisciplinary study of the future human through the analysis of its potential sociotechnical, discursive compositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am not a sociologist and am therefore ill-equipped to engage in a mechanistic analysis of how one might alter modes of scholarly communication and validation in such a way as to foster an easier transdisciplinarity. For those interested in pursuing this issue, I recommend the work of Becher and Trowler [9] as a starting point.

  2. 2.

    Further, discussion of the epistemic roots of LDA and its relation to archive theory allows us to sidestep the (important) issue of data visualization, which can be seen as an obfuscating, but primary motivating factor for the use of digital methods [24].

  3. 3.

    The treatments of DH and hHCI presented here are purposefully broad. While they will likely not satisfy specialists in either DH or hHCI, to seek a middle ground is always to fail in satisfying disciplinary purists.

  4. 4.

    That design implies reconstruction is a primary impetus for the design practices referenced.

  5. 5.

    I do not hold the position that humanistic analysis is out of date or outmoded, but rather make this statement as it appears to be the elephant in the room whenever DH comes up at non-DH conferences.

  6. 6.

    That discourses are present or materialized in texts at the moment of writing does not imply their stability. The text, therefore, constitutes a heterotopia combining both the historical a priori condition in which it was written and the analogous condition in which it is read. It is doubly temporal; doubly historical.

References

  1. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S.: Humanistic HCI. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Lupton, D.: Digital Sociology. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., Taylor, T.L.: Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Vertesi, J., Ribes, D.: digitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Ribes, D., Hoffman, A.S., Slota, S.C., Bowker, G.C.: The logic of domains. Soc. Stud. Sci. 49, 281–309 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719849709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward and ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7, 111–134 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Am. 265, 94–104 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Foucault, M.: The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Becher, T., Trowler, P.: Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Discipline. Open University Press, Philadelphia (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Serres, M.: The Parasite. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bowker, G.C.: Memory Practices in the Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zuboff, S.: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Latour, B.: Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern | bruno-latour.fr. In: Brown, B. (ed.) Things. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L.: Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dawkins, R.: Gaps in the Mind. In: The Great Ape Project, pp. 80–87 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Snow, C.P.: The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., DiSalvo, C., Gaver, W., Sengers, P.: The humanities and/in HCI. In: CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1135–1138. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moretti, F.: Distant Reading. Verso, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moretti, F.: Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Seberger, J.S.: Becoming Objects: IoT, The Archive, and the Future of the Human (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tavory, I., Timmermans, S.: Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Derrida, J.: Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Venturini, T.: Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Underst. Sci. 21, 796–812 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510387558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heidegger, M.: Being and Time. Harper, New York (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Flusser, V.: On Doubt. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Von Uexküll, J.: A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89, 319–391 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1992.89.4.319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heidegger, M.: What is a thing? H. Regnery Co., Chicago (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, pp. 67–82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gitelman, L. (ed.): “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. The MIT Press, Cambridge; London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gitelman, L.: Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents. Duke University Press, Durham (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Drucker, J.: Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Foucault, M.: Governmentality. In: Burchell, G., Gordon, C., Miller, P. (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87–104. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Foucault, M.: The Birth of the Clinic. Routledge, London (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Boullier, D.: The social science and the traces of big data: society, opinion, or vibrations? Revue francaise de science politique (Engl. Ed.) 65, 71–93 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Harman, G.: Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Penguin, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dourish, P.: Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P.: The three paradigms of HCI. In: Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA, pp. 1–18 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Harrison, S., Dourish, P.: Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 67–76. ACM, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dennett, D.C.: Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Bermudez, J.L.: Philosophy of Psychology: Contemporary Readings. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Jr.: Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., Kaye, J.J.: Reflective design. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility, pp. 49–58. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Binder, T., Michelis, G.D., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., Wagner, I.: Design Things. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Woolgar, S.: Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociol. Rev. 38, 58–99 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T., Schnapp, J.: Digital Humanities. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gold, M.K.: Debates in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Jones, S.E.: The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Kirschenbaum, M.: Digital humanities as/is a tactical term. In: Debates in the Digital Humanities, pp. 415–428. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kirschenbaum, M.: What is “digital humanities”, and why are they saying such terrible things about it? Differences 25, 46–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2419997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu, A.: Digital humanities and academic change. Engl. Lang. Notes 47, 17–35 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pannapacker, W.: “Big Tent Digital Humanities,” a View From the Edge, Part 1 (2011). http://chronicle.com/article/Big-Tent-Digital-Humanities/128434/

  53. Porsdam, H.: Digital humanities: on finding the proper balance between qualitative and quantitative ways of doing research in the humanities. Digit. Humanit. Q. 7 (2013). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/3/000167/000167.html

  54. Raley, R.: Digital humanities for the next five minutes. Differences 25, 26–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2419991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ramsay, S.: On building. In: Terras, M., Nyhan, J., Vanhoutte, E. (eds.) Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader. Routledge, Abingdon (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Seberger, J.S.: How long is now? The “digital” in DH. Presented at the DH 2015, Paramatta, NSW (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Blei, D.M.: Topic Modeling and Digital Humanities. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/topic-modeling-and-digital-humanities-by-david-m-blei/

  58. Meeks, E., Weingart, S.: The Digital Humanities Contribution to Topic Modeling. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/dh-contribution-to-topic-modeling/

  59. Rhody, L.M.: Topic Modeling and Figurative Language. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/topic-modeling-and-figurative-language-by-lisa-m-rhody/

  60. Weingart, S.: Topic Modeling for Humanists: A Guided Tour. http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=19113

  61. Anderson, C.: The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete (2008). https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/

  62. Bowker, G.C.: The theory/data thing. Int. J. Commun. 8, 1795–1799 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fitzpatrick, K.: Planned Obsolescence. NYU Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Cetina, K.K.: Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  66. Olsen, M.: Signs, symbols and discourses: a new direction for computer-aided literature studies. Comput. Humanit. 27, 309–314 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Underwood, T.: What kinds of “topics” does topic modeling actually produce? (2012). https://tedunderwood.com/2012/04/01/what-kinds-of-topics-does-topic-modeling-actually-produce/

  68. Bowker, G.C.: Science on the Run: Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920–1940. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Day, R.E.: Indexing It All: The Subject in the Age of Documentation, Information, and Data. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  70. Rogers, R.: Digital Methods. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  71. Nora, P.: L’événement monstre. Communications 18, 162–172 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1972.1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Croce, B.: History. Its Theory and Practice. Harcourt, Brace (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Star, S.L.: This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 35, 601–617 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Røssaak, E.: The Archive in Motion: New Conceptions of the Archive in Contemporary Thought and New Media Practices. Novus Press, Oslo (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Shaviro, S.: The Universe of Things: On Speculative Realism (Posthumanities). Lulu Press Inc, Morrisville (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15, 662–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. McCallum, A.K.: MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John S. Seberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Seberger, J.S. (2020). Bridging DH and Humanistic HCI. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_72

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43686-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43687-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics