Abstract
Bowker’s Age of Potential Memory describes a new era characterized by a culture of knowledge production that fosters and stifles certain forms of statements depending on the logics that subtend them. Through processes of ubiquitous data collection, analysis, and feedback, individuals are increasingly reduced to users; users are re-created as data doubles or data doppelgangers, post hoc, through the aggregation and analysis of their data traces. This discursive transformation of the human that will arise in relation to living alongside and through these doubles or doppelgangers is difficult to understand within the framework of extant disciplinary silos. And yet methods that connect disciplines are emerging. To realize these connections, translational work is required. This paper explores the complementarity of digital humanities (DH) and humanistic human-computer interaction (hHCI) through the lens of distant reading. I focus on distant reading—topic modelling in particular—because of its methodological popularity and relation to discourse. I argue that distant reading comprises a useful connection between these two young domains: a pivot that allows for the inter- or transdisciplinary study of the future human through the analysis of its potential sociotechnical, discursive compositions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I am not a sociologist and am therefore ill-equipped to engage in a mechanistic analysis of how one might alter modes of scholarly communication and validation in such a way as to foster an easier transdisciplinarity. For those interested in pursuing this issue, I recommend the work of Becher and Trowler [9] as a starting point.
- 2.
Further, discussion of the epistemic roots of LDA and its relation to archive theory allows us to sidestep the (important) issue of data visualization, which can be seen as an obfuscating, but primary motivating factor for the use of digital methods [24].
- 3.
The treatments of DH and hHCI presented here are purposefully broad. While they will likely not satisfy specialists in either DH or hHCI, to seek a middle ground is always to fail in satisfying disciplinary purists.
- 4.
That design implies reconstruction is a primary impetus for the design practices referenced.
- 5.
I do not hold the position that humanistic analysis is out of date or outmoded, but rather make this statement as it appears to be the elephant in the room whenever DH comes up at non-DH conferences.
- 6.
That discourses are present or materialized in texts at the moment of writing does not imply their stability. The text, therefore, constitutes a heterotopia combining both the historical a priori condition in which it was written and the analogous condition in which it is read. It is doubly temporal; doubly historical.
References
Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S.: Humanistic HCI. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2015)
Lupton, D.: Digital Sociology. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., Taylor, T.L.: Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)
Vertesi, J., Ribes, D.: digitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2019)
Ribes, D., Hoffman, A.S., Slota, S.C., Bowker, G.C.: The logic of domains. Soc. Stud. Sci. 49, 281–309 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719849709
Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward and ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7, 111–134 (1996)
Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Am. 265, 94–104 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94
Foucault, M.: The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books, New York (1972)
Becher, T., Trowler, P.: Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Discipline. Open University Press, Philadelphia (2001)
Serres, M.: The Parasite. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2013)
Bowker, G.C.: Memory Practices in the Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Zuboff, S.: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs, New York (2019)
Latour, B.: Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern | bruno-latour.fr. In: Brown, B. (ed.) Things. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2004)
Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L.: Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Dawkins, R.: Gaps in the Mind. In: The Great Ape Project, pp. 80–87 (1993)
Snow, C.P.: The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., DiSalvo, C., Gaver, W., Sengers, P.: The humanities and/in HCI. In: CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1135–1138. ACM, New York (2012)
Moretti, F.: Distant Reading. Verso, London (2013)
Moretti, F.: Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso, London (2007)
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)
Seberger, J.S.: Becoming Objects: IoT, The Archive, and the Future of the Human (2019)
Tavory, I., Timmermans, S.: Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2014)
Derrida, J.: Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1998)
Venturini, T.: Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Underst. Sci. 21, 796–812 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510387558
Heidegger, M.: Being and Time. Harper, New York (1962)
Flusser, V.: On Doubt. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2015)
Von Uexküll, J.: A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds. Semiotica 89, 319–391 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1992.89.4.319
Heidegger, M.: What is a thing? H. Regnery Co., Chicago (1968)
Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, pp. 67–82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (1977)
Gitelman, L. (ed.): “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. The MIT Press, Cambridge; London (2013)
Gitelman, L.: Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents. Duke University Press, Durham (2014)
Drucker, J.: Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2014)
Foucault, M.: Governmentality. In: Burchell, G., Gordon, C., Miller, P. (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87–104. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)
Foucault, M.: The Birth of the Clinic. Routledge, London (2012)
Boullier, D.: The social science and the traces of big data: society, opinion, or vibrations? Revue francaise de science politique (Engl. Ed.) 65, 71–93 (2015)
Harman, G.: Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Penguin, London (2018)
Dourish, P.: Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P.: The three paradigms of HCI. In: Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA, pp. 1–18 (2007)
Harrison, S., Dourish, P.: Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 67–76. ACM, New York (1996)
Dennett, D.C.: Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)
Bermudez, J.L.: Philosophy of Psychology: Contemporary Readings. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)
Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Jr.: Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods (2002)
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., Kaye, J.J.: Reflective design. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility, pp. 49–58. ACM, New York (2005)
Binder, T., Michelis, G.D., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., Wagner, I.: Design Things. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
Woolgar, S.: Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociol. Rev. 38, 58–99 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x
Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T., Schnapp, J.: Digital Humanities. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)
Gold, M.K.: Debates in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2012)
Jones, S.E.: The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. Routledge, New York (2013)
Kirschenbaum, M.: Digital humanities as/is a tactical term. In: Debates in the Digital Humanities, pp. 415–428. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2012)
Kirschenbaum, M.: What is “digital humanities”, and why are they saying such terrible things about it? Differences 25, 46–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2419997
Liu, A.: Digital humanities and academic change. Engl. Lang. Notes 47, 17–35 (2009)
Pannapacker, W.: “Big Tent Digital Humanities,” a View From the Edge, Part 1 (2011). http://chronicle.com/article/Big-Tent-Digital-Humanities/128434/
Porsdam, H.: Digital humanities: on finding the proper balance between qualitative and quantitative ways of doing research in the humanities. Digit. Humanit. Q. 7 (2013). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/3/000167/000167.html
Raley, R.: Digital humanities for the next five minutes. Differences 25, 26–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2419991
Ramsay, S.: On building. In: Terras, M., Nyhan, J., Vanhoutte, E. (eds.) Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader. Routledge, Abingdon (2011)
Seberger, J.S.: How long is now? The “digital” in DH. Presented at the DH 2015, Paramatta, NSW (2015)
Blei, D.M.: Topic Modeling and Digital Humanities. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/topic-modeling-and-digital-humanities-by-david-m-blei/
Meeks, E., Weingart, S.: The Digital Humanities Contribution to Topic Modeling. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/dh-contribution-to-topic-modeling/
Rhody, L.M.: Topic Modeling and Figurative Language. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-1/topic-modeling-and-figurative-language-by-lisa-m-rhody/
Weingart, S.: Topic Modeling for Humanists: A Guided Tour. http://www.scottbot.net/HIAL/?p=19113
Anderson, C.: The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete (2008). https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
Bowker, G.C.: The theory/data thing. Int. J. Commun. 8, 1795–1799 (2014)
Fitzpatrick, K.: Planned Obsolescence. NYU Press, New York (2011)
Cetina, K.K.: Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996)
Olsen, M.: Signs, symbols and discourses: a new direction for computer-aided literature studies. Comput. Humanit. 27, 309–314 (1993)
Underwood, T.: What kinds of “topics” does topic modeling actually produce? (2012). https://tedunderwood.com/2012/04/01/what-kinds-of-topics-does-topic-modeling-actually-produce/
Bowker, G.C.: Science on the Run: Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920–1940. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Day, R.E.: Indexing It All: The Subject in the Age of Documentation, Information, and Data. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)
Rogers, R.: Digital Methods. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)
Nora, P.: L’événement monstre. Communications 18, 162–172 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1972.1272
Croce, B.: History. Its Theory and Practice. Harcourt, Brace (1921)
Star, S.L.: This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 35, 601–617 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
Røssaak, E.: The Archive in Motion: New Conceptions of the Archive in Contemporary Thought and New Media Practices. Novus Press, Oslo (2010)
Shaviro, S.: The Universe of Things: On Speculative Realism (Posthumanities). Lulu Press Inc, Morrisville (2016)
Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15, 662–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
McCallum, A.K.: MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Seberger, J.S. (2020). Bridging DH and Humanistic HCI. In: Sundqvist, A., Berget, G., Nolin, J., Skjerdingstad, K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12051. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_72
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_72
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43686-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43687-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)