Skip to main content

Softmax and McFadden’s Discrete Choice Under Interval (and Other) Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics (PPAM 2019)

Abstract

One of the important parts of deep learning is the use of the softmax formula, that enables us to select one of the alternatives with a probability depending on its expected gain. A similar formula describes human decision making: somewhat surprisingly, when presented with several choices with different expected equivalent monetary gain, we do not just select the alternative with the largest gain; instead, we make a random choice, with probability decreasing with the gain – so that it is possible that we will select second highest and even third highest value. Both formulas assume that we know the exact value of the expected gain for each alternative. In practice, we usually know this gain only with some certainty. For example, often, we only know the lower bound \(\underline{f}\) and the upper bound \(\overline{f}\) on the expected gain, i.e., we only know that the actual gain f is somewhere in the interval \(\left[ \,\underline{f},\overline{f}\right] \). In this paper, we show how to extend softmax and discrete choice formulas to interval uncertainty.

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science) and HRD-1242122 (Cyber-ShARE Center of Excellence). The authors are thankful to the anonymous referees for valuable suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aczél, J., Dhombres, J.: Functional Equations in Several Variables. Camridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hurwicz, L.: Optimality Criteria for Decision Making Under Ignorance, Cowles Commission Discussion Paper, Statistics, no. 370 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S.: Econometric models of probabilistic choice: beyond McFadden’s formulas. In: Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S., Huynh, V.-N. (eds.) Robustness in Econometrics. SCI, vol. 692, pp. 79–87. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50742-2_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kreinovich, V.: Decision making under interval uncertainty (and beyond). In: Guo, P., Pedrycz, W. (eds.) Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences. SCI, vol. 502, pp. 163–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39307-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kreinovich, V.: Decision making under interval (and more general) uncertainty: monetary vs. utility approaches. J. Comput. Technol. 22(2), 37–49 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kreinovich, V.: From traditional neural networks to deep learning: towards mathematical foundations of empirical successes. In: Shahbazova, S.N., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the World Conference on Soft Computing, Baku, Azerbaijan, 29–31 May 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luce, D.: Inividual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. Dover, New York (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Luce, R.D., Raiffa, R.: Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. Dover, New York (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105–142. Academic Press, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McFadden, D.: Economic choices. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 351–378 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Train, K.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladik Kreinovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kubica, B.J., Bokati, L., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V. (2020). Softmax and McFadden’s Discrete Choice Under Interval (and Other) Uncertainty. In: Wyrzykowski, R., Deelman, E., Dongarra, J., Karczewski, K. (eds) Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics. PPAM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12044. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43222-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43222-5_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43221-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43222-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics