Skip to main content

Learning Leadership by Doing—‘Route for Renewal©’ Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Developing Public Sector Leadership

Abstract

‘I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only make them think’ is a proverb from Socrates which is also a very good motto for designing training for a VUCA-world. It is also something that is rather different from the traditional approach to leadership training which continues to support the rather naive idea that there is a knowledge-based solution to every problem, preferably provided by some researcher or external expert. The key issue in facing an unknown future and complex challenges is to realise that there are no ready or simple answers for how to think, or how to take action. From the perspective of learning, listening to lectures does not necessarily open new horizons for thought nor does it generate new kinds of action. In practice, solutions and real changes arise when knowledge, skills and experience are combined in a manner that is different from how this has been done before. This requires bringing knowledge to a personal level and the interactive building of understanding. It also calls for the taking of a step away from the temptation to draw quick conclusions from contradictory opinions or facts and seeing bewilderment as a fruitful condition. Long-term training provides an ideal platform to learn when it is designed in such a way that it develops the ability to think and seek solutions together. When the training is not delivered from an expert position, but instead as an open-ended dialogue with and between the participants, it also creates a great opportunity to practise all the important meta-skills discussed in Chap. 5. In this chapter, we describe in detail how the Route for Renewal© training programme (2016–2018) was designed and conducted in Finland by the Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra. The main aim of the leadership training was to precipitate a systemic change in terms of leadership for the 2020s within the Finnish Central Government. Eight specific learning activities are described in detail, as well as the solutions-focused paradigm of change and facilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Warm data laboratory at Sitra Fund, June 2019.

  2. 2.

    The Solutions-Focused (SF) approach originally became attached to organizational change and training via the therapy concept. As therapy, it was developed in the 1950s by Milton H. Erickson and was devised in the mid to late 1980s as part of the interactional brief therapy tradition by Steve de Shazer, Insoo Kim Berg and their colleagues at the Brief Family Therapy Centre in Milwaukee (McKergow and Clarke 2007).

  3. 3.

    We are grateful to the participants for their valuable insights and sincere involvement.

References

  • Bannik F, Jackson PZ (2011) Positive psychology and solution focus. Interact J Solution Focus Organ 3(1):8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushe GR (1998) Five theories of change embedded in appreciative inquiry. In: 18th presentation at annual world congress of organization development, Dublin, 14–18 July 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless D (2007) Learning-oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. J Innov Educ Teach Int 44(1):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino JJ Jr (2016) From stone to stone across the unknown sea. Creative Leaps International (available at http://creativeleaps.org/resources/articles, accessed on 30.7.2019)

  • Clarke J (2006) Turning clients into customers for change—the art of platform building. In: Lueger G, Korn H-P (eds) Solution-focused management. Rainer Hampp Verlag, Berlin, pp 357–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J (2012) Memorable workshops: adding variety to our sessions. Interact J Solution Focus Organ 4(1):28–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider D, Whitney D (2006) The change handbook. Appreciative inquiry: a positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton J (2010) Question utilization in solution-focused brief therapy: a recursive frame analysis of Insoo Kim Berg’s solution talk. Qual Rep 15(1):18–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronen EC, Lang P, Lang S (2009) Circular questions and coordinated management of meaning theory. Human systems. J Ther Consultation Training 20(1):7–34

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono E (1985) Six thinking hats. Little Brown and Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierolf K (2012) Is SF a systemic approach? Interact J Solution Focus Organ 4(4):10–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck C (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random house, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham T (2018) How to design for scale: lessons for ambitious new interventions: many programs are developed with features that make them inherently difficult to scale up. Apolitical. https://apolitical.co/solution_article/how-to-design-for-scale/, accessed on 30.7.2019

  • Hankovszky K, Hirchburger F, Meier D, Szabó P, von Bidder S (2012) Yet another paradigm shift: some congruent ideas about SF Training. Interact J Solution Focus Organ 4(1):21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré R (1996) The rediscovery of the human mind. In: Kim (ed) Proceedings of the 50th anniversary conference of the Korean Psychological Association, Psychology dept, Chung-ang University, Seoul, Korea. Available at http://www.massey.ac.nz/~alock/virtual/korea.htm. Accessed on 15.7.2019

  • Kennedy F, Carroll B, Francoeur F (2013) Mindset not skill set: evaluating in new paradigms of leadership development. In: Advances in developing human resources vol 15, issues 1. SAGE Publications, pp 10–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang PW, Little M, Cronen V (1990) The systemic professional domains of action and the question of neutrality. Hum Syst J Syst Consultation Manag 1(1):39–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Linley A (2008) From average to A+. Realising strengths in yourself and others. Capp Press, Coventry

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonka K (2018) Phenomenal learning from Finland. Edita, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • McKergow M, Bailey H (2014) Host: six new ROLES of engagement for teams, organizations, communities and movements. Solution books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McKergow M, Clarke J (2007) Solutions focus working: 80 real life lessons for successful organizational change. Solutions Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miksits M (2014) Imagining organizational futures: towards a systemic constructionist practice perspective. Professional doctorate thesis on Systemic Practice, University of Bedfordshire, Bedfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller PA, Oppenheimer DM (2014) The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science OnlineFirst. Available at: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.udel.edu/dist/6/132/files/2010/11/Psychological-Science-2014-Mueller-0956797614524581-1u0h0yu.pdf. Accessed on 5.7.2019

  • Norling U (2015) The story behind “effects of solutions focused leadership training on productivity and behavior”. J Solution Focus Organ 7(1):44–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschl MF (2007) Triple-loop learning as foundation for profound change, individual cultivation, and radical innovation: Construction processes beyond scientific and rational knowledge. Constructivist Found 2(2–3):136–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Purokuru V (2016) Taiteen menetelmät kehittämisessä ja tutkimuksessa. Publication of the Committee for the Future of the Parliament of Finland, Helsinki, pp 12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme AGL, Witteloostuijn A (1999) Circular organizing and triple loop learning. J Organ Change Manag 12(5):439–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso BD, Dekas KH, Wrzesniewski A (2010) On meaning of work: a theoretical integration and review. Res Organ Behav 30(4):91–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Salonen M (2015) Systeeminen johtaminen julkisella sektorilla. City of Helsinki, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross RB, Smith BJ (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook: strategies and tools for building a learning organization. Doubleday Verso, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter J (2008) Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty. Organ Stud 29(4):501–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitra (2018) Phenomenon-based public administration: discussion paper on reforming the government’s operating practices. Sitra Working paper. Available at www.sitra.fi. Accessed on 4.6.2019

  • Stenvall J, Virtanen P (2017) Intelligent public organizations? Pub Organ Rev 17(2):195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundman P, Johansson B (2012) Practical ideas for stimulating quality in training. J Solution Focus Organ 4(1):8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó P (2009) Coaching reloaded—assumptions of a brief coach in interaction. J Solution Focus Organ 1(2):26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammeaid M (2012) Photography—a powerful tool in solution focused use in interaction. J Solution Focus Organ 4(2):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A (2018) A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems. Policy Soc. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1497933. Accessed on 6.8.2018

  • Virtanen P, Stenvall J (2018) Intelligent health policy. Theory, concept and practice. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser C, Schlundt Bodien G (2009) Supporting Client’s solutions building and expectations of beneficial change. Interact J Solution Focus Organ 1(2):9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeig KZ, Muinon MM (1999) Milton H. Erikson. Key figures in counselling and psychotherapy. Sage, p 123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marika Tammeaid .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Virtanen, P., Tammeaid, M. (2020). Learning Leadership by Doing—‘Route for Renewal©’ Case Study. In: Developing Public Sector Leadership. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42311-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics