Skip to main content
Book cover

Victimology pp 359–379Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

A Theory of Injustice and Victims’ Participation in Criminal Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1722 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter sees the author develop a ‘theory of injustice’ that will provide the basis for a victimological perspective on justice processes. The chapter commences with some reflections on the consequence of viewing justice and injustice as poles of one dimension. As the author exposes his theory of injustice, he argues that the issue at stake is the manner in which this theory connects to victim’s participation in justice processes and criminal proceedings. Acknowledging that victims need to communicate their experience in justice processes, Pemberton casts doubt on the extent to which this is best understood in terms of reducing their stress symptoms: becoming less anxious or changing the sentence. He proposes that the justice process itself can be an important site for reconnection: of victim experience with society and with important symbols of shared values. This critical stance has some degree of synergy with the restorative justice perspective and central to his proposition is the need to understand that injustice concerns a relationship of victim with his or her self, rather than a relationship with other persons. The second requirement is to appreciate that this self is only accurately understood if it is conceived as being-in-the-world. Only then does the experience of injustice come into its own—when it amounts to an ontological assault. The arguments put forward in this chapter require a fundamental re-think about the way we experience our victimisation and by implication, the traditional ways in which we have come to think about activism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence: Isolation and Communion in Western Man. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. M. (2015). Torture and Dignity: An Essay on Moral Injury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brison, S. J. (2002). Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of the Self. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. (2000). On the Rejection of Morality: Bernard Williams’ Debt to Nietzsche. In R. Schacht (Ed.), Nietzsche’s Postmoralism (pp. 100–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M. L. (2000). Narrative Psychology, Trauma and the Study of Self/Identity. Theory & Psychology, 10, 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1997). Phronesis, Clinical Reasoning and Pellegrino’s Philosophy of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine, 18, 173–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (2000). When the Story’s Over: Narrative Foreclosure and the Possibility of Self-renewal. In M. Andrews, S. D. Sclater, C. Squire, & A. Treacher (Eds.), Lines of Narrative: Psychosocial Perspectives (pp. 81–91). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gadow, S. (1980). Existential Advocacy: Philosophical Foundation of Nursing. In S. Spicker & S. Gadow (Eds.), Nursing Images and Ideals: Opening Dialogue with the Humanities (pp. 79–101). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garro, L. C. (1992). Chronic Illness and the Construction of Narratives. In M. J. D. Good, P. E. Brodwin, B. J. Good, & A. Kleinman (Eds.), Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective (pp. 100–137). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodey, J. (2005). Victims and Victimology. Research, Policy, Practice. Harlow, UK: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, P. (1988). The Drowned and the Saved. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative Justice: The Evidence. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1888/1967). On the Genealogy of Morals (R. J. Hollingdale & W. Kaufman, Trans.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1990, 26 November). The Misfortune Teller. The New Republic, pp. 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (1979). Toward a Reconstruction of Medical Morality: The Primacy of the Act of Profession and the Fact of Illness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 4, 32–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, A. (2009). Victim Movements: From Varying Needs to Diversified Criminal Justice Agenda’s. Acta Criminologica, 22, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, A. (2015). Victimology with a Hammer: The Challenge of Victimology. Tilburg: Prismaprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, A., & Aarten, P. G. M. (2017). Judith Shklar’s Victimology and Restorative Justice. In I. Aertsen & B. Pali (Eds.), Criticial Restorative Justice (pp. 315–330). Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, A., Aarten, P. G. M., & Mulder, E. (2017). Beyond Retribution, Restoration and Procedural Justice: The Big Two of Communion and Agency in Victims’ Perspectives on Justice. Psychology, Crime and Law, 23(7), 682–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, A., Mulder, E., & Aarten, P. G. M. (2019). Stories of Injustice: Towards a Narrative Victimology. European Journal of Criminology, 16(4), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of Being. Phenomenology, Psychiatry and the Sense of Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. (2012). The Phenomenology of Existential Feeling. In J. Fingerhut & S. Marienburg (Eds.), Feelings of Being Alive (pp. 23–54). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. (2017). Real Hallucinations. Psychiatric Illness, Intentionality and the Interpersonal World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M., Ruddel, M., & Smith, B. (2014). What Is a Sense of Foreshortened Future? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1986). Life: A Story in Search of a Narrator. In M. Doeser & J. Kray (Eds.), Facts and Values (pp. 34–68). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review. Emotion Review, 1, 60–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheingold, S., Olson, T., & Pershing, J. (1994). Sexual Violence, Victim Advocacy and Republican Criminology: Washington’s Community Protection Act. Law and Society Review, 28(4), 729–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebold, A. (1999). Lucky. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. (1986). Legalism: Law, Morals and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. (1990). The Faces of Injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, H. (2002). Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, L. (2008). Restorative Justice, Self-interest and Responsible Citizenship. Cullumpton, Devon, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wemmers, J. M. (1996). Victims in the Criminal Justice System. The Hague: The Netherlands, WODC/Kugler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1993). Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: CA. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, C. (1991). Rape as Social Murder. Anthropology Today, 7(3), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolgast, E. (1987). The Grammar of Justice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yack, B. (1999). Putting Injustice First. Social Research, 66, 1103–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale: Herald Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antony Pemberton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pemberton, A. (2020). A Theory of Injustice and Victims’ Participation in Criminal Processes. In: Tapley, J., Davies, P. (eds) Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42288-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42288-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42287-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42288-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics