Abstract
Professional communication consultancy work which examines business processes and organisational realities through the lens of language is gaining legitimacy. In this chapter I examine the tensions these new kinds of professional-academic collaborations may create. Using examples from my recent consultancy projects, and drawing on existing scholarship theorising these issues in management and business studies, I explore whether—and how—it is possible to produce relevant results and remain academically rigorous at the same time. I focus on issues that arise from clients’ needs for immediate problem-solving through research practices and theory-building that are accepted by a research community, especially in the type of interdisciplinary work where discipline-boundary-crossing leads to scepticism and questioning of academic rigour. Thus, this chapter aims to expose and acknowledge unavoidable tensions between academic and consultancy work in the hope that we will not compromise our academic integrity and rigour, nor the potential for future impact outside academia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alessi, G. M., & Jacobs, G. (2016). The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Taking the Linguistic Turn in Organizational Research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 136–158.
Baxter, J. (2017). Resolving a Gender and Language Problem in Women’s Leadership: Consultancy Research in Workplace Discourse. Discourse & Communication, 11(2), 141–159.
Berglund, T. Ö. (2009). Disrupted Turn Adjacency and Coherence Maintenance in Instant Messaging Conversations. Language@Internet, (6), article 2.
Branson, R. (2014). How Language Shapes the Way We Work. Retrieved from https://www.virgin.com/richardbranson/how-language-shapes-the-way-we-work.
Breeze, R. (2013). Corporate Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
Candlin, C. N. (2002). Introduction. In C. Candlin (Ed.), Research and Practice in Professional Discourse (pp. 1–36). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
Candlin, C. N., & Sarangi, S. (2004). Making Inter-relationality Matter in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 225–228.
Candlin, S. (2003). Issues Arising When the Professional Workplace Is the Site of Applied Linguistic Research. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 386–394.
Cooren, F. (2006). Arguments for the In-depth Study of Organizational Interactions: A Rejoinder to McPhee, Myers, and Trethewey. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 327–340.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Czerniawska, F. (1997). Corporate Speak. The Use of Language in Business. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Darics, E. (2019). Critical Language and Discourse Awareness in Management Education. Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562919848023.
Darics, E. (2020). Language Awareness in Business and the Professions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darics, E., & Clifton, J. (2018). Making Applied Linguistics Applicable to Business Practice. Discourse Analysis as a Management Tool. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy040.
Darics, E., & Lockwood, J. (2019a). “I’m Actually Shocked of How Rude You Are”: An Examination of a Problematic Online Customer Service Interaction. Unpublished manuscript.
Darics, E., & Lockwood, J. (2019b). “I’m Actually Shocked of How Rude You Are!” Communication Challenges in Webchat-Based Customer Service. Unpublished manuscript.
Dodge, J., Ospina, S. M., & Foldy, E. G. (2005). Integrating Rigor and Relevance in Public Administration Scholarship: The Contribution of Narrative Inquiry. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 286–300.
Ereaut, G. (2013). How Language Reveals Barriers to Success. Market Leader Quarter 1, 34–36.
Forey, G., & Lockwood, J. (2007). “I’d Love to put Someone in Jail for This”: An Initial Investigation of English Needs in the Business Processing Outsourcing (BPO) Industry. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 308–326.
Ganapini, C. (2016). Evaluating Topical Talk in Interactional Business Settings: When “Testing the Waters” with Customers May Not Be Much of a Gamble. In G. M. Alessi, & G. Jacobs (Eds) The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 161–181.
Grant, D., & Iedema, R. (2005). Discourse Analysis and the Study of Organizations. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 25(1), 37–66.
Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (2001). Organizational Discourse: Key Contributions and Challenges. International Studies of Management & Organization, 31(3), 5–24.
Grey, C. (2001). Re-imagining Relevance: A Response to Starkey and Madan. British Journal of Management, 12, S27–S32.
Herring, S. (1999). Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(0). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x.
Hünerberg, R., & Geile, A. (2012). Language Awareness as a Challenge for Business. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 215–234.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London and New York: Continuum.
Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533.
Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2012). Collaborate with Practitioners: But Beware of Collaborative Research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 14–28.
Kimberly, J. R. (2007). Shifting Boundaries: Doing Research and Having Impact in the World of Business Education. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 138–145.
Koller, V. (2018). Critical Discourse Studies. In B. Vine (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace (pp. 27–39). London and New York: Routledge.
Kraan, W. (2005). The Metaphoric Use of Space in Expert-Lay Interaction about Computing Systems. In C. D. Baker, E. Michael, & F. Alan (Eds.), Calling for Help: Language and Social Interaction in Telephone Helplines (pp. 91–108). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lindström, J. (2009). Interactional Linguistics. In S. D’Hondt, J. O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), The Pragmatics of Interaction (pp. 96–103). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ly, A. (2016). Getting Access to Language Data in the Workplace: Role Enactment as a Data-Generation Method. In G. M. Alessi & G. Jacobs (Eds.), The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse Research (pp. 63–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mautner, G. (2016). Discourse and Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mautner, G., & Reiner, F. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of Business Communication, Linguistic Approaches. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
McIntyre, D., & Price, H. (Eds.). (2018). Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. Oxon: Routledge.
Mullany, L. (2020). Sociolinguistic Awareness in Business Professionals: Breaking Stereotypes and Language Myths. In E. Darics (Ed.), Language Awareness in Business and the Professions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Musson, G., Cohen, L., & Tietze, S. (2007). Pedagogy and the ‘Linguistic Turn’. Developing Understanding Through Semiotics. Management Learning, 38(1), 45–60.
Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602–620.
Palmer, D., Dick, B., & Freiburger, N. (2009). Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(4), 265–272.
Perriton, L., & Hodgson, V. (2013). Positioning Theory and Practice Question(s) within the Field of Management Learning. Management Learning, 44(2), 144–160.
Powley, E. H. (2013). The Process and Mechanisms of Organizational Healing. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(1), 42–68.
Roberts, C. (2003). Applied Linguistics Applied. In S. Sarangi & T. Van Leeuwen (Eds.), Applied Linguistics and Communities of Practice (pp. 132–149). London: Continuum.
Roberts, C., & Sarangi, S. (2003). Uptake of Discourse Research in Interprofessional Settings: Reporting from Medical Consultancy. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 338–359.
Ruhleder, K., & Jordan, B. (2001). Co-constructing Non-mutual Realities: Delay- Generated Trouble in Distributed Interaction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10(1), 113–138.
Sarangi, S. (2002). Discourse Practitioners as a Community of Interprofessional Practice: Some Insights from Health Communication Research. In C. Candlin (Ed.), Research and Practice in Professional Discourse (pp. 95–136). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
Thompson, N. (2003). Communication and Language: A Handbook of Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tietze, S., Cohen, L., & Musson, G. (2003). Understanding Organizations through Language. London: Sage.
Van De Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. (2006). Knowledge for Theory and Practice. The Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.
Walsh, J. P., Tushman, M. L., Kimberly, J. R., Starbuck, B., & Ashford, S. (2007). On the Relationship Between Research and Practice: Debate and Reflections. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(2), 128–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Darics, E. (2020). The Relevance of Applied Linguistic and Discourse Research: On the Margins of Communication Consultancy. In: Mullany, L. (eds) Professional Communication. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41668-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41668-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41667-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41668-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)