Abstract
The significance of this ICT research was to explore and investigate bridging a path between nations in the middle of a conflict by the influence of Internet Communication Technologies such as online social networks websites, online applications, and Facebook Pages. To adhere to communications on topics that are related to the reconciliation process as an ethical virtue to apply the process of moral practices towards reconciliation in the middle of the conflict.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Reconciliation Process, is the process that promotes moderation, reconciliation, and democracy for social change in the middle of conflict.
- 2.
Barakat, Z. (2017). From Heart of Stone to Heart of Flesh: Evolutionary Journey from Extremism to Moderation. München: Herbert Utz Verlag GmbH.
- 3.
See Chap. 5 for details.
- 4.
See Chap. 5 for the adaptation of the Wasatia Cycle.
- 5.
Ego centered network is “personal networks or ego-centered networks, an ego-centered network is the network surrounding one particular individual, meaning, usually, the individual surveyed and his or her immediate contacts. The individual surveyed is referred to as the ego and the contacts as alters” (Newman 2010, p. 44).
- 6.
See Chap. 7.
- 7.
See Chap. 3.
- 8.
See Chap. 7.
- 9.
Described in detail in Chap. 3.
- 10.
The procedure in described in Chap. 8.
- 11.
More details about the aim and the purposes are discussed in Chap. 3.
- 12.
According to Kozinets (2015).
- 13.
see Chap. 7.
- 14.
The order is according to the importance and mostly referenced to in the communication research.
- 15.
See Chap. 9.
Bibliography
Books
Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (Ed.). (2004). From conflict resolution to reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed-Methods Research. London: SAGE. Available at Amazon [Kindle Edition].
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (Eds.). (2012). Applied Phronesis in Real Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Kozinets, R. (2015). Netnography redefined (2nd ed.). California: SAGE.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Pennsylvania: SAGE.
Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saldana, J. (2013a). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Vrasidas, C., Zembylas, M., & Glass, G. (2009). ICT for education development and social justice. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Articles in Journals & Chapters in Books
Fisher, R. (2001). Social – psychological processes in interactive conflict analysis and reconciliation. In M. Abu-Nimer (Ed.), Reconciliation, justice, and coexistence (pp. 25–45). Lanham: Lexington Books.
Kohlbacher, F. (2012). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1–30. From http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0601211.
Leiner, M. (2018). Conclusion: From conflict resolution to reconciliation. In M. Leiner & C. Schliesser (Eds.), Alternative approaches in conflict resolution (pp. 175–183). Palgrave Macmillan.
Moaz, I. (2004). Social cognitive mechanisms in reconciliation. In Yaacov Bar–Simon-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 225–237). New York: Oxford University Press.
Saldana, J. (2013b). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. [Kindle Edition] Available at Amazon.
Sandelowski, M. (2000, August). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340.
Internet Resources
Dajani, M. (2014). Wasatia NGO. Accessed 15 Jan 2016. Available at www.wasatia.info/aboutWasatia
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Accessed 6 May 2015. Available at from http://qix.sagepub.com/content/12/2/219.short
Penna, S. E. Q. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. [Online 7 June 2013]. Accessed 20 May 2014. Available at from www.youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YyVySrV2cM
Schulz, D. (2012). YouTube – analyzing your interviews. Accessed 4 May 2015. Available at Southampton Education School. Available at http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~sesvideo/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
AlDajani, I.M. (2020). Research Analysis, Interpretations & Evaluation. In: Internet Communication Technology (ICT) for Reconciliation. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41203-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41203-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41202-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41203-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)