Abstract
Compromise refers to mutually acceptable agreements. These can apply to relations between states and in inter-personal social relationships between people. This chapter notes the difference between political and social compromise and proceeds to provide a sociological approach to social compromise in inter-personal relations between people. It advances a sociological theorisation of social compromise, something which the discipline has hitherto neglected, and applies it to understanding the practice of compromise amongst victims of conflict in Northern Ireland, South Africa and Sri Lanka. It argues that the discipline of sociology can help us better understand social compromise, and the chapter sets out a prolegomenon towards the sociology of social compromise, drawing on data from three post-conflict societies.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The research was funded by the Leverhulme Trust, grant number F/100/152/AK and ran between 2009 and 2015. The methodology is outlined in Brewer et al. (2018a: 4–9). A rigorous sampling procedure was applied to ensure a random sample of victims was obtained unbiased towards socially desirable responses.
Bibliography
Archard, D. (2012). Moral Compromise. Philosophy, 87(3), 403–420.
Arendt, H. (1989 [1958]). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bailey, J. (2000). Some Meanings of “the Private” in Sociological Thought. Sociology, 34, 381–401.
Benjamin, M. (1990). Splitting the Difference. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Braithwaite, V. (2004). The Hope Process and Social Inclusion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592, 128–151.
Brewer, J. D. (2003). C. Wright Mills and the Ending of Violence. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Brewer, J. D. (2010). Peace Processes: A Sociological Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brewer, J. D. (2011). Dealing with Emotions in Peacemaking. In S. Karstedt, I. Loader, & H. Strang (Eds.), Emotions, Crime and Justice (pp. 295–313). Oxford: Hart.
Brewer, J. D. (2013). Sociology and Peacebuilding. In R. Mac Ginty (Ed.), Handbook of Peacebuilding (pp. 159–170). London: Taylor and Francis.
Brewer, J. D. (2015a). The Limits of Politics in Northern Ireland’s Peace Process. In J. O’Grady, J. Fernando, & C. Higgins (Eds.), Mining Truths: Festschrift in Honour of Geraldine Smyth OP – Ecumenical Theologian and Peacebuilder (pp. 185–202). Emming, Germany: Editions of Sankt Ottilien.
Brewer, J. D. (2015b). Peace Processes. In J. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 648–653). Oxford: Elseviers.
Brewer, J. D., Higgins, G. I., & Teeney, F. (2011). Religion, Civil Society and Peace in Northern Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brewer, J. D., Hayes, B. C., Dudgeon, K., Mueller-Hirth, N., Teeney, F., & Wijesinghe, S. L. (2018a). The Sociology of Everyday Life Peacebuilding. London: Palgrave.
Brewer, J. D., Hayes, B. C., & Teeney, F. (2018b). The Sociology of Compromise After Conflict. London: Palgrave.
Calhoun, C. (2000). The Virtue of Civility. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29, 251–275.
Connerton, P. (2008). Seven Types of Forgetting. Memory Studies, 1, 59–72.
Drahos, P. (2004). Trading in Public Hope. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 592, 18–38.
Elster, J. (2004). Closing the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.
Giddens, A. (1996). In Defence of Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
Goffman, E. (1966). Behaviour in Public Places. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Graham, L. (2016). Beyond Social Capital. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hayes, B. C., & Brewer, J. D. (2018). The Road to Compromise in Sri Lanka. In J. D. Brewer, B. C. Hayes, & F. Teeney (Eds.), The Sociology of Compromise After Conflict (pp. 157–178). London: Palgrave.
Hochschild, A. (2003). The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Holmes, M. (2000). When Is the Personal Political? The President’s Penis and Other Stories, Sociology, 34, 305–321.
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Karstedt, S. (2002). Emotions and Criminal Justice. Theoretical Criminology, 6, 299–317.
Kingwell, M. (1995). A Civil Tongue. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press.
Kumar, K., & Makarova, E. (2008). The Portable Home: The Domestication of Public Space. Sociological Theory, 26, 324–343.
Leopora, C. (2012). On Compromise and Being Compromised. Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(1), 1–22.
Leopora, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2013). On Complicity and Compromise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, J., & Weigert, A. (1985a). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985.
Lewis, J., & Weigert, A. (1985b). Social Atomism, Holism and Trust. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 955–971.
Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday Peace: Bottom-Up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564.
Margalit, A. (2010). On Compromise and Rotten Compromises. Princeton: University Press.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Misztal, B. (2011). Forgiveness and the Construction of New Conditions for a Common Life. Contemporary Social Science, 6(1), 39–53.
Mollering, G. (2001). The Nature of Trust. Sociology, 35, 403–420.
Mueller-Hirth, N. (2018). Forgiveness and the Practice of Compromise in Post-Apartheid South Africa. In J. D. Brewer, B. C. Hayes, & F. Teeney (Eds.), The Sociology of Compromise After Conflict (pp. 103–128). London: Palgrave.
O’Neill, O. (1993). Practices of Toleration. In J. Lichtenberg (Ed.), Democracy and the Mass Media (pp. 155–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paris, R. (2004). At War’s End. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Colombia University Press.
Reiff, D. (2016). In Praise of Forgetting. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Seligman, A. (1997). The Problem of Trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Seligman, A. (1998). Trust and Sociability. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57, 391–404.
Sennett, R. (2003[1974]). The Fall of Public Man. London: Penguin.
Smith, A. (2018). Barriers to Trust in a “Peace Process Generation”: Ambivalence in Young Catholics in Northern Ireland. In J. D. Brewer, B. C. Hayes, & F. Teeney (Eds.), The Sociology of Compromise after Conflict (pp. 75–101). London: Palgrave.
Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tuomela, R. (2002). The Philosophy of Social Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wijesinghe, S. L., & Brewer, J. D. (2018). Peace-Religiosity and Forgiveness Amongst War Victims in Sri Lanka. In J. D. Brewer, B. C. Hayes, & F. Teeney (Eds.), The Sociology of Compromise After Conflict (pp. 129–155). London: Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brewer, J.D. (2020). Towards a Sociology of Social Compromise: Social Compromise Amongst Victims of Conflict in Northern Ireland, South Africa and Sri Lanka. In: Baume, S., Novak, S. (eds) Compromises in Democracy. Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40802-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40802-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40801-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40802-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)