Skip to main content

Time Analysis of Teaching and Learning Method Based on LOVE Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education (ICL 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1134))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 884 Accesses

Abstract

Thailand Higher Education is changing over the tradition teaching and learning method approach to the outcome based education. The instructors must redesign their courses in active learning for balancing the learner experience. The four main dimensions for assessment framework are learning (L), observing (O), visiting (V), and experimenting (E). These dimensions are grouped and named as LOVE model which can be classified for teaching and learning method to balancing the student learning experience. Time analysis of teaching and learning method based on the LOVE model is adapted to analyze 7 science courses from two universities: 2 graduate courses and 5 undergraduate courses. The results showed the percentage of teaching and learning dimensions are as follows. The “L” is at 38.31%. The “O” is at 55.03%. The ‘E” is at 6.67%. But the “V” does not appear during the lecturing. In addition, the consequences demonstrate that each course must be improved for the learner experience to complete the loop. The student can gain the learning experience when the four dimensions are offered to them. The LOVE model is the essential tool for learning experience assessment based on teaching and learning method. The performances of teaching and learning method are reflected by the LOVE dimensions. This issue encourages that the instructors should achieve the course objectives for transferring the immersive knowledge into the empirical experience which are increasingly transferred into the competency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krajcik, J., Mcneill, K.L., Reiser, B.: Learning-goals-driven design model: developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Sci. Educ. 92, 1–32 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kerby, D., Romine, J.: Develop oral presentation skills through accounting curriculum design and course-embedded assessment. J. Educ. Bus. 85, 172–179 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, E., Krajcik, J.: Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educ. Res. 34, 3–14 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coenders, F., et al.: The effects of the design and development of a chemistry curriculum reform on teachers’ professional growth: a case study. J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 21, 535–557 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hussadintorn Na Ayutthaya, D., Koomsap, P.: Assessment of student learning experience with ‘LOVE’. In: 11th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference (IATED), Valencia, Spain (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hussadintorn Na Ayutthaya, D., Koomsap, P.: An application of ‘LOVE’ model for assessing research experience. In: 25th ISTE International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering (TE), Modena, Italy (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hussadintorn Na Ayutthaya, D., et al.: Learning experience from teaching and learning methods in engineering education: instructors’ viewpoint. In: 13th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED), Valencia, Spain (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nitkiewicz, T., et al.: The quality of education on workplace safety master studies-the issue of teaching methods. Syst. Saf.: Hum. Tech. Facil. Environ. 1, 661–669 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilakjani, A.P.: Visual, auditory, kinaesthetic learning styles and their impacts on English language teaching. J. Stud. Educ. 2, 104–113 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly, D.L., Kolstad, C.D.: Bayesian learning, growth, and pollution. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 23, 491–518 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bentsen, P., Jensen, F.S.: The nature of udeskole: outdoor learning theory and practice in Danish schools. J. Adv. Educ. Outdoor Learn. 12, 199–219 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mccarthy, P.R., Mccarthy, H.M.: When case studies are not enough: integrating experiential learning into business curricula. J. Educ. Bus. 81, 201–204 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miettinen, R.: The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 19, 54–72 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Healey, M., Jenkins, A.: Kolb’s experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. J. Geogr. 99, 185–195 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen, S., Liu, M.: Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 51, 57–76 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de la Sablonnière, R., Taylor, D., Sadykova, N.: Challenges of applying a student- centered approach to learning in the context of education in Kyrgyzstan. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 29, 628–634 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kengpol, A., Tuammee, S.: The development of a decision support framework for a quantitative risk assessment in multimodal green logistics: an empirical study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51, 1020–1038 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kengpol, A., Tuammee, S., Tuominen, M.: The development of a framework for route selection in multimodal transportation. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 25, 581–610 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meethom, W., Koohathongsumrit, N.: Design of decision support system for road freight transportation routing using Multilayer Zero One Goal Programming. Eng. J. 22, 185–205 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meethom, W., Koohathongsumrit, N.: An integrated potential assessment criteria and TOPSIS based decision support system for road freight transportation routing. Appl. Sci. Eng. Prog. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok Contract No. KMUTNB-NRU-58-05. This research was also funded by ERASMUS + Programme of the European Union, Project No. 586137-EPP-1-2017-1-TH-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP, and Grant Agreement Number: 2017-3515/001-001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kengpol, A., Koohathongsumrit, N., Meethom, W. (2020). Time Analysis of Teaching and Learning Method Based on LOVE Model. In: Auer, M., Hortsch, H., Sethakul, P. (eds) The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education. ICL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics