Skip to main content

Subgroup Identification for Tailored Therapies: Methods and Consistent Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 833 Accesses

Part of the book series: Emerging Topics in Statistics and Biostatistics ((ETSB))

Abstract

In contrast to the “one-size-fits-all” approach of traditional drug development, the paradigm of tailored therapeutics seeks to identify subjects with an enhanced treatment effect. In this chapter, we describe a statistical approach (TSDT) to subgroup identification that utilizes ensemble trees and resampling. For each potential subgroup identified, TSDT produces a multiplicity-adjusted strength of the subgroup finding as well as a bias-adjusted estimate of the treatment effect in the identified subgroup, both of which are important for decision-making in the development of tailored therapeutics. We describe a careful examination of simulation studies in a number of related publications, in order to determine the ideal framework to compare subgroup identification methods. A simulation study is performed to evaluate the performance of TSDT. The method has been implemented in a publicly available R package.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Breiman L (1996) Bagging markers. Mach Learn 24:123–140

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman & Hall, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G (2001) Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Health Technol Assess 5(33):1–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusseldorp E, Van Mechelen I (2014) Qualitative interaction trees: a tool to identify qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions. Stat Med 33:219–237

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foster JC, Taylor JM, Ruberg SJ (2011) Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data. Stat Med 30(24):2867–2880

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29(5):1189–1232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkovich I, Dmitrienko A (2014) Strategies for identifying predictive biomarkers and subgroups with enhanced treatment effect in clinical trials using SIDES. J Biopharm Stat 24:130–153

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkovich I, Dmitrienko A, Denne J, Enas G (2011) Subgroup identification based on differential effect search- a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations. Stat Med 30(21):2601–2621

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Loh W-Y, He X, Man M (2015) A regression tree approach to subgroup identification for censored data. Stat Med 34(11):1818–1833

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Negassa A, Ciampi A, Abrahamowicz M, Shapiro S, Boivin J-F (2005) Tree-structured subgroup analysis for censored survival data: validation of computationally inexpensive model selection criteria. Stat Comput 15:231–239

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell PM (2005) Subgroup analysis in randomized controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet 365:176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruberg SJ, Chen L, Wang Y (2010) The mean does not mean as much anymore: finding subgroups for tailored therapeutics. Clin Trials 7:574–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Ding Y, Battioui C (2015) A framework of statistical methods for identification of subgroups with differential treatment effects in randomized trials. In: Applied statistics in biomedicine and clinical trials design: selected papers from 2013 ICSA/ISBS Joint Statistical Meetings, Chapter 25. Springer, Cham, pp 411–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Su XG, Zhou T, Yan X, Fan J, Yang S (2008) Interaction trees with censored survival data. Int J Biostat 4(1):2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Su X, Tsai CL, Wang H, Nickerson DM, Li B (2009) Subgroup analysis via recursive partitioning. J Mach Learn Res 10:141–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH et al (2007) Statistics in medicine – reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. New Eng J Med 357:2189–2194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong CH, Siah KW, Lo AW (2019) Estimating clinical trial success rates and related parameters in oncology. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3355022

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Shen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shen, L., Showalter, H., Battioui, C., Denton, B. (2020). Subgroup Identification for Tailored Therapies: Methods and Consistent Evaluation. In: Ting, N., Cappelleri, J., Ho, S., Chen, (G. (eds) Design and Analysis of Subgroups with Biopharmaceutical Applications. Emerging Topics in Statistics and Biostatistics . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40105-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics