Skip to main content

New Methodology to Estimate Costs Caused by Rail Wear and RCF Depending on the Type of Running Gear

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks (IAVSD 2019)

Abstract

A new methodology to estimate costs for wear and Rolling Contact Fatigue (RCF) on rails that cause a major portion of track maintenance costs is presented. It is demonstrated for a standard UIC-Y25 bogie and a FR8RAIL bogie, a softer and cross-braced iteration of the former. The rail profile evolution and the surface-initiated fatigue on the rail surface for different track radii with progressive tonnage are calculated using multi-body simulations. ‘Fastrip’ is used to calculate tangential stresses on the contact patch. Various non-linearities in the vehicle and track models have been considered, based on running conditions on the Swedish Iron-ore line. A cyclic rail grinding procedure at fixed tonnage intervals based on recommendations from EN13231-5 is implemented, to also account for the effect of track maintenance on the rate of rail surface damage. The wear depths (W), worn cross-sectional areas (A) and the number of axle passes that carry a risk for RCF initiation (\(N_r\)) are presented and discussed for 100 Mega Gross Tonnes passage. In doing so, the methodology addresses ‘track-friendliness’ of the running gear considering both its design and the track maintenance strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith, A., Iwnicki, S., Kaushal, A., Odolinski, K., Wheat, P.: Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 231(5), 620–636 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Öberg, J., Andersson, E.: Determining the deterioration cost for railway tracks. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 223(2), 121–129 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holzfeind, J., Nerlich, I., Giger, M., Schweiz, B.: Wear-based component in the track access charging system of Switzerland - an incentive to return to a reflection on an overall optimum (in German). In: ZEVrail, vol. 139, pp. 6–7 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hossein-Nia, S., Sichani, M., Stichel, S., Casanueva, C.: Wheel life prediction model – an alternative to the FASTSIM algorithm for RCF. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 56(7), 1051–1071 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2017.1403636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, X., Yang, T., Zhang, J., Cao, Y., Wen, Z., Jin, X.: Rail wear on the curve of a heavy haul line-numerical simulations and comparison with field measurements. Wear 366–367, 131–138 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Six, K., Mihalj, T., Trummer, G., Marte, C., Krishna, V.V., Hossein-Nia, S., Stichel, S.: Assessment of running gears regarding rolling contact fatigue of wheels and rails based on stochastic simulations. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems (CM2018), pp. 878–885, Delft (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heyder, R., Brehmer, M.: Empirical studies of head check propagation on the DB network. Wear 314(1–2), 36–43 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zoeteman, A., Dollevoet, R., Li, Z.: Dutch research results on wheel/ rail interface management : 2001–2013 and beyond. J. Rail Rapid Transit 228(6), 642–651 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. European Committee for Standardization: EN 13231-5:2018– Procedures for rail reprofiling in plain line, switches, crossings and expansion devices . Technical report (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schoech W., Heyder R., Grohmann H: Contact geometry and surface fatigue - guidelines for appropriate rail maintenance. In: 7th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, Brisbane (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Committee for Standardization: EN13231-3:2012- Acceptance of reprofiling rails in track. Technical report (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krishna, V.V., Casanueva, C., Hossein-Nia, S., Stichel, S.: FR8RAIL Y25 running gear for high tonnage and speed. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Heavy Haul Association Conference IHHA, pp. 690–697, Narvik (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Visakh V. Krishna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Krishna, V.V., Hossein-Nia, S., Stichel, S. (2020). New Methodology to Estimate Costs Caused by Rail Wear and RCF Depending on the Type of Running Gear. In: Klomp, M., Bruzelius, F., Nielsen, J., Hillemyr, A. (eds) Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks. IAVSD 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38077-9_84

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38077-9_84

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38076-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38077-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics