Abstract
The main qualitative research methods are discussed and compared. Data analysis, writing up results, and presenting findings are covered. The principal qualitative approaches explored in this chapter are interviews and qualitative questionnaires. These methods seek meanings, understandings and interpretations from individuals speaking directly to a researcher. Also discussed are case studies, action research, observation, content analysis and systematic reviews. A case study is a multi-method approach used when a specific instance or situation is chosen to investigate a general phenomenon. In action research, researchers and participants work together. In both cases, and in particular in action research, the goal is to improve a particular situation or service. Part of both of the latter methods may involve observations, where researchers look at what is taking place ‘live’ in situ. They may also undertake a content analysis, which is a systematic analysis of records, documents, and field notes. Removed completely from a fieldwork setting, the final method discussed in this chapter is the systematic review. This aims to rigorously evaluate and synthesise findings of prior primary research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lund H, Brunnhuber K, Juhl C, et al. Towards evidence-based research. BMJ. 2016;355:i5440.
Jamshed S. Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2014;5(4):87–8.
Besen-Cassino Y, Cassino D. Social research methods by example: applications in the modern world. London: Taylor & Francis; 2017.
Nicholas D, Huntington P, Williams P. An evaluation of the use of NHS touch-screen health kiosks: a national study. ASLIB Proc. 2002;54(6):372–84.
Mintzberg H. An emerging strategy of “direct” research. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24(4):582–9.
Richie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.
Parkinson S, Eatough V, Holmes J, Stapley E, Midgley N. Framework analysis: a worked example of a study exploring young people’s experiences of depression. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;13(2):1–21.
Nind M. What is inclusive research? London: Bloomsbury; 2014.
King R. All things bright and beautiful: a sociological study of infants’ classrooms. Chichester: Wiley; 1978.
Rathje W. Rubbish!: the archaeology of garbage. New York: Harper Collins; 1992.
Mayo E. The social problems of an industrial civilization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1949.
Dawson D, Lighton B. A patient guide to the use of insulin for diabetes. Birmingham: Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham; 2018. https://www.uhb.nhs.uk/Downloads/pdf/PiNewToInsulin.pdf. Accessed 04 Oct 2019.
Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1 [updated March 2011]. http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/.
Further Reading
Smith J, Firth J. Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):52–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, P., Cutler, S. (2020). Qualitative Methods and Analysis. In: Ramlaul, A. (eds) Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy Research: Skills and Strategies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37944-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37944-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37943-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37944-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)