Skip to main content

Choosing Methods for Manufacture of Reinforced Concrete Frames Based on Solution of Optimisation Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
VIII International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum (TransSiberia 2019)

Abstract

A methodology has been suggested for assessing the economic efficiency of making decisions on the selection of a technology for constructing plane reinforced concrete frames manufactured without pre-stressing reinforcement. The approach is based on execution of the optimum synthesis of a structure for each of the process options in question. The optimisation is carried out using a metaheuristic scheme of evolutionary modelling. A task has been set to minimise the planned manufacturing cost of a reinforced-concrete frame while taking into consideration the peculiarities of the processes for cast-in-situ, prefabricated, and composite structures. The regulatory limitations in terms of strength, stiffness, and crack resistance of the framework are taken into consideration. Concrete and reinforcing steel classes, cross-section values of columns and cross bars, as well as the amount and diameters of reinforcement bars vary on discrete sets. The search is performed using a genetic algorithm stipulating functioning of the main and elite populations. In the main population, individuals are subjected to single-point crossover, mixed mutation execution procedures, and selection based on the criterion of minimum cost. The elite population is used for storage of efficient genetic material and replacement of inoperative individuals of the main population. When calculating the stress strain behaviour of the structure variants, the factors taken into consideration are the physically non-linear behaviour of concrete and reinforcement, and the possibility of formation of transverse cracks in concrete. The operability of the suggested methodology is illustrated via the example of selecting a method of constructing a double-span reinforced concrete frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Perez, R.E., Behdinan, K.: Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization. Comput. Struct. 85, 1579–1588 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaveh, A., Talatahari, S.: Optimum design of skeletal structures using imperialist competitive algorithm. Comput. Struct. 88(21–22), 1220–1229 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W., Lee, S.-H., Bae, K.-W.: The harmony search heuristic algorithm for discrete structural optimization. Eng. Optim. 37(7), 663–684 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaveh, A., Farhoudi, N.: A new optimization method: dolphin echolocation. Adv. Eng. Softw. 59, 53–70 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamberti, L.: An efficient simulated annealing algorithm for design optimization of truss structures. Comput. Struct. 86(19–20), 1936–1953 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaveh, A., Mahdavi, V.R.: Colliding bodies optimization method for optimum design of truss structures with continuous variables. Adv. Eng. Softw. 70, 1–12 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaveh, A., Zolghadr, A.: Cyclical parthenogenesis algorithm for shape and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints. Eng. Optim. 49(8), 1317–1334 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadollaha, A., Bahreininejada, A., Eskandarb, H., Hamdia, M.: Mine blast algorithm for optimization of truss structures with discrete variables. Comput. Struct. 102–103, 49–63 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miguel, L.F.F., Lopez, R.H., Miguel, L.F.F.: Multimodal size, shape and topology optimization of truss structures using the firefly algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 56, 23–37 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Degertekin, S.O., Hayalioglu, M.S.: Sizing truss structures using teaching-learning-based optimization. Comput. Struct. 119, 177–188 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stolpe, M.: Truss optimization with discrete design variables: a critical review. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 53(2), 349–374 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Pholdee, N., Bureerat, S.: A comparative study of eighteen self-adaptive metaheuristic algorithms for truss sizing optimisation. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 22(8), 2982–2993 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaveh, A., Ilchi Ghazaan, M.: Vibrating particles system algorithm for truss optimization with multiple natural frequency constraints. Acta Mech. 228(1), 307–322 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. McCall, J.: Genetic algorithms for modelling and optimization. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 184(1), 205–222 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Serpik, I.N., Alekseytsev, A.V., Balabin, P.Y.: Mixed approaches to handle limitations and execute mutation in the genetic algorithm for truss size, shape and topology optimization. Period. Polytech. Civil Eng. 61(3), 471–482 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Govindaraj, V., Ramasamy, J.V.: Optimum detailed design of reinforced concrete frames using genetic algorithms. Eng. Optimiz. 39(4), 471–494 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaveh, A., Sabzi, O.: A comparative study of two meta-heuristic algorithms for optimum design of reinforced concrete frames. Int. J. Civil Eng. 9(3), 193–206 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paya, I., Yepes, V., Gonzalez-Vidosa, F., Hospitaler, A.: Multiobjective optimization of concrete frames by simulated annealing. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. 23(8), 596–610 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Serpik, I.N., Mironenko, I.V., Averchenkov, V.I.: Algorithm for evolutionary optimization of reinforced concrete frames subject to nonlinear material deformation. Procedia Eng. 150, 1311–1316 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ulusoy, S., Kayabekir, A.E., Bekdaş, G., Nigdeli, S.M.: Optimum design of reinforced concrete multi-story multi-span frame structures under static loads. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 10(5), 403–407 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Serpik, I.N., Alekseytsev, A.V.: Optimization of flat steel frame and foundation posts system. Mag. Civil Eng. 61(1), 14–24 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Serpik, I.N., Alekseytsev, A.V., Balabin, P.Y., Kurchenko, N.S.: Flat rod systems: optimization with overall stability control. Mag. Civil Eng. 76(8), 181–192 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 18-08-00567.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Serpik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Serpik, I., Mironenko, I. (2020). Choosing Methods for Manufacture of Reinforced Concrete Frames Based on Solution of Optimisation Problems. In: Popovic, Z., Manakov, A., Breskich, V. (eds) VIII International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum. TransSiberia 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1116. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37919-3_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37919-3_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37918-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37919-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics