Skip to main content

Equity of Public Pension System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Challenges of Pension Systems

Abstract

Fairness is an important feature of pension systems, but it is a wide concept with multiple sides. In this chapter, we try to distinguish some of them with the aim of using the terms in a proper manner. More specifically, we have observed at least five meanings for the notion of fairness when applying to a pension system: justice, equity, neutrality, solidarity and integrity. We explain each sense of fairness and other related concepts. We also provide, when possible, a way to measure each of them, with some figures for a selected European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \( A\left(r,\lambda, s,j,T\right)={\sum}_{i=j}^T{\left(1+r\right)}^{j-i}{\left(1+\lambda \right)}^{i-j}{s}_i \)

    \( {s}_i=\prod \limits_{k=j}^i\left(1-{q}_k\right) \), where qk is the mortality rate from age k to k + 1 (qT = 1).

  2. 2.

    Jimeno and Licandro (1999) and Devesa et al. (2012) attempt to obtain the internal rate of return of the Spanish pension systems.

  3. 3.

    For example, the age or reference is 62 in Finland, 65 in Portugal and 67 in Spain. In addition, in Spain and Portugal, the adjustment is a ratio of life expectancies instead of a ratio of annuity factors.

References

  • Aaron, H. J. (1966). The social insurance paradox. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 32, 371–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Actuarial Association of Europe. (2016). The Ageing of the EU – implications for pensions, Discussion paper. http://actuary.eu/documents/AAE-The-ageing-of-the-EU_DEF.pdf

  • Belloni, M., & Maccheroni, C. (2013). Actuarial fairness when longevity increases: an evaluation of the Italian pension system. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 38, 638–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devesa, J. E., Devesa, M., Meneu, R., Nagore, A., Domínguez, I., & Encinas, B. (2012). Equidad y sostenibilidad como objetivos ante la reforma del sistema contributivo de pensiones de jubilación. Hacienda Pública Española, 201(2/2012), 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015a). The 2015 ageing report - Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013-2060). European Economy 3/2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015b). The 2015 Pension adequacy report: Current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU. Volume I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno, J. F., & Licandro, O. (1999). La tasa interna de rentabilidad y el equilibrio financiero del Sistema español de pensiones de jubilación. Investigaciones Económicas, 23(1), 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meneu, R., Devesa, E., Devesa, M., Domínguez, I., Encinas, B. (2016). Adjustment mechanisms and intergenerational actuarial neutrality in pension reforms. International Social Security Review 69(1), 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer. (2016). Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index. Melbourne: Australian Centre for Financial Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). OECD pensions outlook 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/pens_outlook-2016-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, H. (2005). Actuarial neutrality across generations applied to public pensions under population ageing: Effects on government finances and national saving. European Economy Economic Papers, no. 230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queisser, M., & Whitehouse, E. (2006). Neutral or fair? actuarial concepts and pension-system design. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 40. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1958). An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. The Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, E. (2007). Life-expectancy risk and pensions: who bears the burden? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, n° 60. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Meneu-Gaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meneu-Gaya, R., Encinas-Goenechea, B., Domínguez-Fabián, I. (2020). Equity of Public Pension System. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J., Domínguez-Fabián, I., Devolder, P. (eds) Economic Challenges of Pension Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37912-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics