Abstract
In this final chapter, I will attempt to draw all of the prior discussions together into a new portrait of contemporary language learners in higher education. I will suggest new ways forward, in both learning and teaching, instructional design and research, starting from the composite terrain described above (Fig. 1 in Chapter 7). My attempt at profiling contemporary language learners in higher education will combine reflections on learning in an informal context with the learning in an institutional context that is the subject of Chapters 4 and 5. The following section will identify the junctions between the two, in order to take a more accurate look at the mechanisms that lead to the language development of contemporary learners in higher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Marie Wilson Nelson’s (1990) book of this title explains that until a learner has expressed a need, asked a question, she will not hear the answer and will not be ready to process the information provided. Differentiated pedagogy is therefore a necessity, because the information given to a group will only be learned by those who already had the underlying questions in mind.
- 2.
As the theses cited in Chapter 6, Sect. 1 suggest.
References
Block, D. (1999). Who framed SLA research? Problem framing and metaphoric accounts of the SLA research process. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 135–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Candas, P. (2009). Analyse de pratiques d’étudiants dans un centre de ressources de langues: Indicateurs d’autonomie dans l’apprentissage (Thèse de doctorat). Université de Strasbourg. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00943151.
Cole, J. (2015). Foreign language learning in the age of the internet: A comparison of informal acquirers and traditional classroom learners in central Brazil (Doctoral thesis). University of Oxford, Oxford.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024.
Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit AND explicit learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eneau, J. (2005). La part d’autrui dans la formation de soi; Autonomie, Autoformation et Réciprocité en Contexte Organisationnel. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Kusyk, M. (2017). Les dynamiques du développement de l’anglais au travers d’activités informelles en ligne: Une étude exploratoire auprès d’étudiants français et allemands (Thèse de doctorat). Pädagogische Hochschule Karlsruhe and Université de Strasbourg.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12314.
Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris: Seuil.
Narcy-Combes, J.-P., & Narcy-Combes, M.-F. (2000). Épistémologie et méthodologie de la recherche dans le secteur LANSAD: Qu’apporterait une harmonisation des pratiques? ASp. la revue du GERAS, 27–30, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.2136.
Rivens Mompean, A. (2013). Le Centre de Ressources en Langues: Vers la modélisation du dispositif d’apprentissage. Lille: Éditions du Septentrion. http://www.septentrion.com/en/livre/?GCOI=27574100883330.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011.
Sockett, G., & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000031.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304–318.
Toffoli, D. (2015). University students’ plurilingual profiles in a French fronier city: Similarities and differences between more and less plurilingual students. Language Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0002.
Toffoli, D., El Khatib, S., Fierro-Porto, M., & Hamade, F. (2014). Rapport d’enquête sur les représentations étudiantes et l’apprentissage des langues à l’Université de Strasbourg (p. 41). Strasbourg: Université de Strasbourg.
Toffoli, D., & Perrot, L. (2017). Autonomy, the online informal learning of english (OILE) and learning resource centers (LRCs): The relationships between learner autonomy, L2 proficiency, L2 autonomy and digital literacy. In M. Cappellini, T. Lewis, & A. Rivens Mompean (Eds.), Learner autonomy and web 2.0 (pp. 198–228). Sheffield: Equinox.
Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2010). How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using web 2.0 tools. ASp. La Revue Du GERAS, 58, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1851.
Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2013). University teachers’ perceptions of Online Informal Learning of English (OILE). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.776970.
Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2014). English language music: Does it help with learning? Recherche et Pratiques Pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité. Cahiers de l’Apliut, XXXIII(2), 192–209.
Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2015). L’apprentissage informel de l’anglais en ligne (AIAL), qu’est-ce que ça change pour les centres de langues? Recherche et Pratiques Pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité. Cahiers de l’Apliut, XXXIV(1). https://apliut.revues.org/5055.
Toffoli, D., & Speranza, L. (2016). L’autonomie comme facteur déterminant dans la réussite d’un enseignement Lansad en sciences historiques. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité. Cahiers de l’Apliut, 35(spécial 1). https://doi.org/10.4000/apliut.5505.
Trestini, M. (2016). Théorie des systèmes complexes appliquée à la modélisation d’environnements numériques d’apprentissage de nouvelle génération. Environnements Informatiques pour l’Apprentissage Humain (HDR, Université de Strasbourg). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01432687.
Vanderplank, R. (2016). Captioned media in foreign language learning and teaching: Subtitles for the deaf and hard-of-hearing as tools for language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson Nelson, M. (1990). At the point of need. Heinemann Educational Books. http://www.goodreads.com/work/best_book/4591403-at-the-point-of-need-teaching-basic-and-esl-writers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toffoli, D. (2020). A Portrait of Contemporary Language Learners in Higher Education. In: Informal Learning and Institution-wide Language Provision. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37876-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37876-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37875-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37876-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)