Skip to main content

Towards a Taxonomy of Virtual Reality Usage in Education: A Systematic Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

Virtual reality market is undergoing a rapid extension and continually evolves with technological advancements. Today it is populated with solutions which are complex in terms of interaction and graphics. One such example is applications for educational purposes, a distinct class of VR solutions, development of which implies consideration of multiple disciplines. However, there is still no standard general-purposes classification of those solutions. Different interested parties develop separate and mosaic categorizations based on their field, audience and purposes. This paper reviews reported classification schemes of using virtual reality for learning and summarizes them towards a taxonomy. It tries to implement a multidisciplinary approach, without focusing on one particular aspect, but rather integrating prospects from such fields as human-computer interaction, pedagogy, psychology, and technology. The paper provides a brief overview of existing veins of VR research on education and training as well as proposes relevant research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, P. L., Zimand, E., Hodges, L. F., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2005). Cognitive behavioral therapy for public-speaking anxiety using virtual reality for exposure. Depression and Anxiety,22(3), 156–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ángel Rueda, C. J., Valdés Godínes, J. C., & Rudman, P. D. (2018). Categorizing the educational affordances of 3-dimensional immersive digital environments. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice,17, 83–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boletsis, C. (2017). The new era of virtual reality locomotion: A systematic literature review of techniques and a proposed typology. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction,1(4), 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology,41(1), 10–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drachsler, H., & Kirschner, P. A. (2012). Learner characteristics. Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1743–1745). US, Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, I., Miller, A., & Jiang, S. (2012). A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. British Journal of Educational Technology,43(6), 949–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvestad, E. O. (2016). Evidence of learning in virtual reality. Department of Computer Science. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Retrieved April 9, 2019 from http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~krogstie/project-reports/2016/elvestad/Litteraturstudie%20-%20Endre%20Elvestad%20-2016.pdf.

  • Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology,46(2), 412–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvan, C. (2018). What is a virtual world? Definition and classification. Educational Technology Research and Development,66(5), 1087–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, S. W., Wang, Z., Funk, M., & Maes, P. (2017, June). Investigating social presence and communication with embodied avatars in room-scale virtual reality. In International Conference on Immersive Learning (pp. 75–90). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology,41(1), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, L., Chi, H. L., Tarng, W., Chai, J., Panuwatwanich, K., & Wang, X. (2017). A framework of innovative learning for skill development in complex operational tasks. Automation in Construction,83(January), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, S. G., Juanes, J. A., García Peñalvo, F. J., Estella, J. M. G., Ledesma, M. J. S., & Ruisoto, P. (2018). Virtual reality as an educational and training tool for medicine. Journal of Medical Systems,42(3), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies,23(4), 1515–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education,10(2), 85–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, S., Luxton-reilly, A., Wüensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2016). Creating 360° educational video: A case study. In OzCHI ’16 Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 34–39).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology,80(3), 299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Yi, W., Chi, H. L., Wang, X., & Chan, A. P. C. (2018). A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Automation in Construction,86(November), 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellet-d’Huart, D. (2009). Virtual reality for training and lifelong learning. Themes in Science and Technology Education,2(1–2), 185–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menin, A., Torchelsen, R., & Nedel, L. (2018). An analysis of VR technology used in immersive simulations with a serious game perspective. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,38(2), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education,70, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikropoulos, T. A., & Bellou, J. (2010). The unique features of educational virtual environments. Teaching and learning with technology: Beyond constructivism (pp. 249–258).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education,56(3), 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabiyouni, M., Saktheeswaran, A., Bowman, D. A., & Karanth, A. (2015). Comparing the performance of natural, semi-natural, and non-natural locomotion techniques in virtual reality. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI) (pp. 3–10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 239–263).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, K., & Biocca, F. (2001). Understanding the influence of agency and anthropomorphism on copresence, social presence and physical presence with virtual humans. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyesolu, M. O., Nwasor, V. C., Ositanwosu, O. E., & Iwegbuna, O. N. (2013). Pedagogy: Instructivism to socio-constructivism through virtual reality. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications,4(9), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., et al. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education,95, 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeil, A., & Eppler, M. J. (2008). Collaboration patterns for knowledge sharing and integration in second life: A classification of virtual 3D group interaction scripts. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Knowledge Management Iknow, Best Paper Selection,14(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding virtual reality—interface, application, and design. (Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments) (Vol. 12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, A., & Prophet, J. (2018). The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis. Computers in Human Behavior,86, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Niehaves, B., Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In Ecis (Vol. 9, pp. 2206–2217).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2010). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a review. Mis Q, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weise, M., & Zender, R. (2017). Interaction techniques in VR learning environments interaktionstechniken in VR-Lernwelten. In Proceedings of DeLFI and GMW Workshops 2017. Chemnitz. Retrieved April 9, 2019 from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2092/paper13.pdf.

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice,41(2), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results are based on the works within the project “D-Masterguide” which was funded under the project reference 01PZ16010F by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung within the subsection “Digitale Medien in der beruflichen Bildung”. The authors would like to express their gratitude as well to the European Social Fund (ESF) by the European Union for co-funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina Makhkamova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Makhkamova, A., Exner, JP., Greff, T., Werth, D. (2020). Towards a Taxonomy of Virtual Reality Usage in Education: A Systematic Review. In: Jung, T., tom Dieck, M.C., Rauschnabel, P.A. (eds) Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37869-1_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics