Skip to main content

Features and Developments of the Modern State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Politics and Society
  • 918 Accesses

Abstract

The institutionalisation of political power is mainly seen in the forms taken by the modern state as a result of a growing centralisation of power. The process of state building led to the reduction of the political fragmentation that had taken place in Western Europe through a multitude of local and independent centres of power in a predominantly agricultural social structure. This phenomenon was generated by the use of violence and through the establishment of permanent armies under the command of a central power. The first manifestation of the state was in the experience of absolutism which later evolved into forms of the rule of law. With the introduction of universal suffrage, the rule of law was further transformed into a democratic state in which all citizens enjoy the same civil and political rights. The entry of the masses into politics has forced power to respond to the claims of an increasingly complex and differentiated society that expresses a multiplicity of interests. State building is distinct from the nation-building process. By nation we mean the transformation of the inhabitants of a territory into a “people” aware of their own history and identity. Administration and bureaucracy are also two fundamental aspects of the modern state. They become stronger to respond to the need for specialisation and differentiation of political functions. Faced with the crisis of state sovereignty in a context of neoliberal globalisation, there is a generalised transformation in the contemporary formulas of governance, and of public bureaucracies, reorganised on the basis of a logic of functional fragmentation and managerialisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almond, G. A., & Powell, B. G. (1966). Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little Brown and Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Alteri, L., & de Nardis, F. (2009). Governance multilivello e partecipazione politica: una introduzione. Partecipazione e conflitto, 2, 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badie, D., & Birnbaum, P. (1982). Sociologie de l’Etat. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1961 [1939–1940]). Feudal Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2008). Regulatory Capitalism—How It Works, Ideas for Making It Work Better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, P. (1999). The Politics of Economic Management in the 1990s. New Political Economy, 4(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, P. (2001). New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticization. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 3(2), 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, P. (2014). Depoliticisation: Economic Crisis and Political Management. Policy and Politics, 42(2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, P. (2017). Neo-liberalism, Crisis and the Contradictions of Depoliticisation. Partecipazione e conflitto, 10(2), 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerroni, U. (1996). Politica. Rome: Seam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. (1964). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur e le système. Les contraintes de l’action collective. Paris: Seul.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Albergo, E. (2006). Politica e amministrazione nell’analisi sociologica: dallo Stato moderno alla governance neoliberista. In A. Costabile, P. Fantozzi, & P. Turi (Eds.), Manuale di sociologia politica (pp. 93–118). Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Albergo, E., & Moini, G. (2017). Depoliticizing Public Action by Politicizing Issues, Practices and Actors. The Role of Resilience Thinking in a Program of the Cariplo Foundation. Partecipazione e conflitto, 10(2), 381–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Nardis, F. (2017). The Concept of De-politicization and Its Consequences. Partecipazione e conflitto, 10(2), 340–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duby, G. (1953). La societé aux XI et XII siècles dans la région maconaise. Paris: Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (1963). The Political Systems of Empires: The Rise and Fall of the Historical Bureaucratic Societies. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, P., & Marsh, D. (2014). Depoliticisation, Governance and Political Participation. Policy&Politics, 42(2), 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, S. (1975). State and Nation-Building in Europe: The Role of the Military. In C. Tilly (Ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe (pp. 84–163). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2008). Delegated Governance and the British State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M., & Buller, J. (2006a). Depoliticization: Principles, Tactics and Tools. British Politics, 1(3), 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M., & Buller, J. (2006b). Depoliticization, Democracy and Arena Shifting. In T. Christensen & P. Lagraeid (Eds.), Autonomy and Regulation. Coping with agencies in the modern state (pp. 53–80). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M., & Wood, M. (2014). Depoliticisation, Governance and the State. Policy&Politics, 42(2), 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. A., Kerr, P., & Byrne, C. (2014). Rolling Back to Roll Forward: Depoliticisation and the Extension of Government. Policy&Politics, 42(2), 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1954). Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C., & Hill, M. (1984). The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2014). Depoliticisation as Process, Governance as Practice: What Did the ‘First Wave’ Get Wrong and Do We Need a ‘Second Wave’ to Put it Right? Policy & Politics, 42(2), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, A. (2015). The Desirability of Depoliticization: Compliance in the International Climate Regime. Transnational Environmental Law, 4(1), 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2009). Cultural Political Economy and Critical Policy Studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 336–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2011). Metagovernance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Handbook of Governance (pp. 106–123). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2014). Repoliticising Depoliticisation: Theoretical Preliminaries on Some Responses to the American Fiscal and Eurozone Debt Crises. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. O. (1970). An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettel, S. (2008). Does Depoliticisation Work? Evidence from Britain’s Membership of the Exchange Rate Mechanism, 1990–92. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 10(4), 630–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W., Klijn, E. K., & Koppenjan, J. (Eds.). (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les Galès, P., & King, D. (2017). Introduction. A Reconfigured State? European Policy State in a Globalizing World. In P. Les Galès & D. King (Eds.), Reconfiguring European States in Crisis (pp. 1–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration, XIX, 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1964). American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics, 16, 677–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review, 4, 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1999). La scienza delle politiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. (Ed.). (1998). Comparing Public Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, Citizenship and Social Development. Garden City: Doubleday & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (1978). Soziologie der Ӧffentlichen Verwaltung. Heidelberg: Muller Juristicher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meny, Y., & Thoening, J.-C. (1989). Politiques publiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1949). Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moini, G. (2015). Capire il neoliberismo: variegatura, egemonia e (de)politicizzazione. In G. Moini (Ed.), Neoliberismi e azione pubblica: il caso italiano (pp. 17–50). Rome: Ediesse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. C. (1985). Political Authority and Bureaucratic Power: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (1995). The Politics of Bureaucracy. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggi, G. (1990). The State. Its Nature, Development, and Prospects. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popitz, H. (1986). Phänomene der Macht. Autorität—Herschaft—Gewalt—Technik. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raeff, M. (1983). The Well-Ordered Police State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Public Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. J. (1981). Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sum, N. L., & Jessop, B. (2013). Towards a Cultural Political Economy. Putting Culture in its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Impossible ‘Sustainability’ and the Post-Political Condition. In R. Krueger & D. Gibbs (Eds.), The Sustainable Development Paradox. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1975). Reflections in the History of the European State Making. In C. Tilly (Ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe (pp. 3–83). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and Society (Vol. 2). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. L. (1975). The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (2014). Seed of Dystopia: Post-Politics and the Return of the Political. In J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The Post-Political and Its Discontents. Spaces of Depoliticisation. Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. (2015). Puzzling and Powering in Policy Paradigm Shifts: Politicization, Depoliticization and Social Learning. Critical Policy Studies, 9(1), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M., & Flinders, M. (2014). Rethinking Depoliticisation: Beyond the Governmental. Policy and Politics, 42(2), 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio de Nardis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Nardis, F. (2020). Features and Developments of the Modern State. In: Understanding Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37760-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics