Skip to main content

The History of Quality Metrics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality Measures

Abstract

In a humorous, satirical editorial, Dr. Joseph Alpert depicts Socrates conversing with Asculepo, a young medical student, regarding the elements of high-quality medicine. In their discussion, Asculepo states that he is confused about the elements of high-quality medicine that his professors called quality “metrics.” Socrates responds that it is “quite strange” that they want to teach you to practice high-quality medicine, but they evidently cannot agree on how to measure this thing called “quality.” During the past two decades, quality measures have evolved to play a crucial role in healthcare delivery; but in many ways, we are still not clear about what they should consist of.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alpert JS. Socrates on quality. Am J Med. 2018;131(8):855–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.03.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayanian JZ, Markel H. Donabedian’s lasting framework for health care quality. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(3):205–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1605101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Consumer Reports. How we rate hospitals. 2018 June. Retrieved from http://article.images.consumerreports.org/prod/content/dam/cro/news_articles/health/PDFs/Hospital_Ratings_Technical_Report.pdf.

  4. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 1966;83(4):691–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Esposito ML, Selker HP, Salem DN. Quantity over quality: how the rise in quality measures is not producing quality results. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(8):1204–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3278-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Frakt AB, Jha AK. Face the facts: we need to change the way we do pay for performance changing how we do pay for performance. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(4):291–2. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-3005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grady D, Redberg RF, O’Malley PG. Quality improvement for quality improvement studies quality improvement for quality improvement studies editorial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(2):187. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang SW, Salem D, Thaler D, Heilman CB. A review of stroke DRG mortality rate as a quality of care measure. AAANS Bulletin. 2007;16(2):28–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deeb N. Salem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Salem, D.N., Kher, S., Charles, D., Freund, K.M. (2020). The History of Quality Metrics. In: Salem, D. (eds) Quality Measures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37145-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37145-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37144-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37145-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics