Skip to main content

The Role of Network Size for the Robustness of Centrality Measures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 881))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Measurement errors are omnipresent in network data. Studies have shown that these errors have a severe impact on the robustness of centrality measures. It has been observed that the robustness mainly depends on the network structure, the centrality measure, and the type of error. Previous findings regarding the influence of network size on robustness are, however, inconclusive.

Based on twenty-four empirical networks, we investigate the relationship between global network measures, especially network size and average degree, and the robustness of the degree, eigenvector centrality, and PageRank. We demonstrate that, in the vast majority of cases, networks with a higher average degree are more robust.

For random graphs, we observe that the robustness of Erdős-Rényi (ER) networks decreases with an increasing average degree, whereas with Barabàsi-Albert networks, the opposite effect occurs: with an increasing average degree, the robustness also increases.

As a first step into an analytical discussion, we prove that for ER networks of different size but with the same average degree, the robustness of the degree centrality remains stable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use NetworkX (version 2.2, [12]) to generate random graphs and calculate centrality measures.

References

  1. Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonacich, P.: Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am. J. Sociol. 92(5), 1170–1182 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borgatti, S.P., Carley, K.M., Krackhardt, D.: On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Soc. Netw. 28(2), 124–136 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In: Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference (WWW 1998) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costenbader, E., Valente, T.W.: The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Soc. Netw. 25(4), 283–307 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Las Rivas, J., Fontanillo, C.: Protein-protein interactions essentials: key concepts to building and analyzing interactome networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6(6), e1000807 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erdös, P., Rényi, A.: On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae 6, 290–297 (1959)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Erman, N., Todorovski, L.: The effects of measurement error in case of scientific network analysis. Scientometrics 104(2), 453–473 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frantz, T.L., Cataldo, M., Carley, K.M.: Robustness of centrality measures under uncertainty: examining the role of network topology. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 15(4), 303–328 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghoshal, G., Barabási, A.-L.: Ranking stability and super-stable nodes in complex networks. Nat. Commun. 2, 394 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman, L.A., Kruskal, W.H.: Measures of association for cross classifications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 49(268), 732–764 (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagberg, A.A., Schult, D.A., Swart, P.J.: Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), pp. 11–15 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holzmann, H., Anand, A., Khosla, M.: Delusive PageRank in incomplete graphs. In: Aiello, L.M., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Lambiotte, R., Lió, P., Rocha, L.M. (eds.) Complex Networks and Their Applications VII, pp. 104–117. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kendall, M.G.: The treatment of ties in ranking problems. Biometrika 33(3), 239–251 (1945)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, P.J., Jeong, H.: Reliability of rank order in sampled networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 55(1), 109–114 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koschützki, D., Lehmann, K., Peeters, L.: Centrality indices. In: Brandes, U., Erlebach, T. (eds.) Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations, pp. 16–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kossinets, G.: Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc. Netw. 28(3), 247–268 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kunegis, J.: KONECT - the Koblenz network collection. In: WWW 2013 Companion - Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J., Faloutsos, C.: Graph evolution: densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 1, 1 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marsden, P.: Network data and measurement. Annu. Rev. Sociol 16(1), 435–463 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin, C., Niemeyer, P.: Influence of measurement errors on networks: estimating the robustness of centrality measures. Netw. Sci. 7(2), 180–195 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murai, S., Yoshida, Y.: Sensitivity analysis of centralities on unweighted networks. In: The World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1332–1342. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newman, M.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2), 167–256 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Niu, Q., Zeng, A., Fan, Y., Di, Z.: Robustness of centrality measures against network manipulation. Phys. A 438, 124–131 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Platig, J., Ott, E., Girvan, M.: Robustness of network measures to link errors. Phys. Rev. E-Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 88, 6 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schulz, J.: Using Monte Carlo simulations to assess the impact of author name disambiguation quality on different bibliometric analyses. Scientometrics 107(3), 1283–1298 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, J.A., Moody, J.: Structural effects of network sampling coverage I: nodes missing at random. Soc. Netw. 35, 4 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, J.A., Moody, J., Morgan, J.H.: Network sampling coverage II: the effect of non-random missing data on network measurement. Soc. Netw. 48, 78–99 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsugawa, S., Ohsaki, H.: Analysis of the robustness of degree centrality against random errors in graphs. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 597, pp. 25–36 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, C., Butts, C.T., Hipp, J.R., Jose, R., Lakon, C.M.: Multiple imputation for missing edge data: a predictive evaluation method with application to Add Health. Soc. Netw. 45, 89–98 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, D.J., Shi, X., McFarland, D.A., Leskovec, J.: Measurement error in network data: a re-classification. Soc. Netw. 34(4), 396–409 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martin, C., Niemeyer, P. (2020). The Role of Network Size for the Robustness of Centrality Measures. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Mendes, J., Moro, E., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 881. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36687-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics