Abstract
Which individuals in a network make the most appealing teammates? Which invitations are most likely to be accepted? And which are most likely to be rejected? This study explores the factors that are most likely to explain the selection, acceptance, and rejection of invitations in self-assembling teams. We conducted a field study with 780 participants using an online platform that enables people to form teams. Participants completed an initial survey assessing traits, relationships, and skills. Next, they searched for and invited others to join a team. Recipients could then accept, reject, or ignore invitations. Using Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs), we studied how traits and social networks influence teammate choices. Our results demonstrated that (a) agreeable leaders with high psychological collectivism send invitations most frequently, (b) previous collaborators, leaders, competent workers, females, and younger individuals receive the most invitations, and (c) rejections are concentrated in the hands of a few.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aldrich, H.E., Kim, P.H.: Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strat. Entrep. J. 1(1–2), 147–165 (2007). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sej.8
Burt, R.S.: Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110(2), 349–399 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
Burt, R.S., et al.: Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Contractor, N.S., Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: an analytic framework and empirical example. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31(3), 681–703 (2006). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318925
Donnellan, M.B., Oswald, F.L., Baird, B.M., Lucas, R.E.: The mini-ipip scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychol. Assess. 18(2), 192 (2006)
Faraj, S., Johnson, S.L.: Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(6), 1464–1480 (2011)
Ferris, G.R., Treadway, D.C., Kolodinsky, R.W., Hochwarter, W.A., Kacmar, C.J., Douglas, C., Frink, D.D.: Development and validation of the political skill inventory. J. Manag. 31(1), 126–152 (2005)
Gilley, J.W., Morris, M.L., Waite, A.M., Coates, T., Veliquette, A.: Integrated theoretical model for building effective teams. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 12(1), 7–28 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422310365309
Gómez-Zará, D., Andreoli, S., DeChurch, L., Contractor, N.: Discovering collaborators online: assembling interdisciplinary teams online at an Argentinian university. Cuadernos.info (44), 21–41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.44.1575
Gómez-Zará, D., Paras, M., Twyman, M., Lane, J.N., DeChurch, L.A., Contractor, N.S.: Who would you like to work with? In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2019, pp. 659:1–659:15. ACM, New York (2019). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3290605.3300889
Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
Hahn, J., Moon, J.Y., Zhang, C.: Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: impact of prior collaboration ties. Inf. Syst. Res. 19(3), 369–391 (2008). https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.1080.0192
Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., Butts, C.T., Goodreau, S.M., Krivitsky, P.N., Morris, M.: ERGM: Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks. The Statnet Project (http://www.statnet.org) (2018). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ergm. R package version 3.9.4
Harris, A.M., Gómez-Zará, D., DeChurch, L.A., Contractor, N.S.: Joining together online: the trajectory of CSCW scholarship on group formation. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 3(CSCW), 148:1–149:27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359250
Hinds, P.J., Carley, K.M., Krackhardt, D., Wholey, D.: Choosing work group members: balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 81(2), 226–251 (2000). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597899928753
Jackson, C.L., Colquitt, J.A., Wesson, M.J., Zapata-Phelan, C.P.: Psychological collectivism: a measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 91(4), 884 (2006)
Leifeld, P., Cranmer, S.J., Desmarais, B.A.: Temporal exponential random graph models with btergm: estimation and bootstrap confidence intervals. J. Stat. Softw. 83(6) (2018). http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/139203/
Lim, B.C., Klein, K.J.: Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. J. Organ. Behav. 27(4), 403–418 (2006). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/job.387
Mumford, M.D., Baughman, W.A., Threlfall, K.V., Uhlman, C.E., Costanza, D.P.: Personality, adaptability, and performance: performance on well-defined problem solving tasks. Hum. Perform. 6(3), 241–285 (1993)
Osterman, P.: Skill, training, and work organization in american establishments. Ind. Relat. J. Econ. Soc. 34(2), 125–146 (1995)
Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., Lusher, D.: An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29(2), 173–191 (2007). Special Section: Advances in Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models
Rudman, L.A., Goodwin, S.A.: Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87(4), 494 (2004)
Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M.: Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad. Manag. J. 45(6), 1137–1148 (2002)
Wagner, C.S., Leydesdorff, L.: Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Res. Policy 34(10), 1608–1618 (2005)
Wang, J., Hicks, D.: Scientific teams: self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence. J. Inf. 9(1), 197–207 (2015). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157714001187
Yilmaz, M., O’Connor, R.V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Clarke, P.: An examination of personality traits and how they impact on software development teams. Inf. Softw. Technol. 86, 101–122 (2017). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095058491730040X
Yon, G.G.V., de la Haye, K.: Exponential random graph models for little networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.10406 (2019)
Zellmer-Bruhn, M.E., Maloney, M.M., Bhappu, A.D., Salvador, R.B.: When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 107(1), 41–59 (2008). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597808000113
Zhu, M., Huang, Y., Contractor, N.S.: Motivations for self-assembling into project teams. Soci. Netw. 35(2), 251–264 (2013). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873313000166, special Issue on Advances in Two-mode Social Networks
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ichhaporia, R., Gómez-Zará, D., DeChurch, L., Contractor, N. (2020). A Network Approach to the Formation of Self-assembled Teams. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Mendes, J., Moro, E., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36683-4_77
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36683-4_77
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36682-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36683-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)