Abstract
This chapter provides the first analyses of the criminal career of the Italian mafias members. The analysis is based on the unique Proton Mafia Member dataset, provided by the Italian Ministry of Justice, with information on all individuals who received a final conviction for mafia offences since the 1980s. The PMM includes information on more than 11 thousand individuals and 182 thousand offences. The study explores the career of mafia members following a three-level approach, analyzing the macro, meso, and micro dimensions of the criminal careers of the mafiosi. At the macro level, Italian mafias’ member show different types of criminal trajectories, with a significant portion of the sample exhibiting a late onset and late persistence pattern. At the meso level, the four main types of mafias (the Sicilian Cosa Nostra, the Neapolitan Camorra, the Calabrian ‘Ndrangheta, and the Apulian mafias) report very similar traits although some distinctive patterns emerge. At the micro level, there are differences in the criminal career between early- and lately- recruited member, with the former showing higher frequency of violent, volume crime and the latter a more complex, white collar profile. A further exploration of the PMM data shows an escalation in both the number and the seriousness of crimes before joining the mafias, which subsequently stabilize afterwards.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The research team considered as mafia offenses the crime of mafia association and other offenses aggravated by the mafia method (i.e.: Articles 416bis, 416ter, 418 of the Italian Criminal Code, and special laws 575/1965, Art. 7 special law 152/1991 and Art. 7 special law 203/1991).
- 2.
The intermittency parameter was discarded, as available data prevent identification of the prison times served by mafia members.
- 3.
The diversity index (DIi) for individual i is defined as \( D{I}_i=1-\sum \limits_{31}^{m=1}{p}_m^{(i)}\ast {p}_m^{(i)} \), where m = 1, 2…31 are the 31 crime categories identified in the dataset and \( {p}_m^{(i)} \)is the proportion of offenses committed by individual i in the crime category m. The diversity index can be interpreted as the probability that any two offenses drawn randomly from an individual’s set of offenses belong to two different crime categories (Piquero et al. 1999). When DIi=0, offender i is completely specialised on one type of crime. Conversely, a value of the index approaching 1 indicates that the offender engages in a diversity of crime categories. Given the number of crime categories identified in the dataset, the maximum value of the diversity index in this analysis is (31-1)/31 = 0.97.
- 4.
Some mafia members in the PMM still commit offences after age 60. However, considering the lack of information on the death date and the technical problem of high singularity of the matrix (the high occurrence of zero offences for the years from age 55 to age 75), the dataset was censored to age 60.
- 5.
Indeed, at a first stage the absolute variance of the entire matrix was too high for the correct computation of the models. Some individuals committed more than 100 offences in a single age/year, while zeros accounted for 75% of the cells of the matrix after the computation (98% before temporal censoring).
- 6.
A new variable (mafia association aggregated) was created by grouping the different values of mafia association by Italian region. This resulted in five categories for mafia association aggregated: “‘Ndrangheta” (grouping members of ‘Ndrangheta and Other Mafias Calabria), “Sicilian Mafia” (grouping members of Cosa Nostra, Stidda and Other Mafias Sicily), “Camorra” (consisting of Camorra members), “Apulian Mafia” (grouping members of Sacra Corona Unita and Other Mafias Apulia) and “Mafia Lucana” (consisting of members of Mafia Lucana). Results for “Mafia Lucana” are not presented in the following analysis as only 28 offenders in the dataset are members of this mafia organization, thus impeding to draw comparable conclusions on their criminal career’s patterns.
- 7.
For each Italian province where the number of mafia members born in that province was higher than 100, the relative frequencies of the mafia groups (values of mafia association aggregated) were calculated. If the relative frequency of a mafia group within a province was greater or equal than 85%, that value was imputed into a new variable named mafia association aggregated clean for all individuals born in that Italian province.
- 8.
The sample includes n = 129,571 offenses out of the total 182,867 offenses in the PMM dataset. This discrepancy is due to two reasons: firstly, offenses committed before 1982 or with missing year are excluded from these charts. Secondly, offenses with a missing value for the mafia association variable (after the data imputation) are excluded as well.
- 9.
The drop in the number of crimes committed by all mafia organizations in more recent years (approximately from 2007 onwards) might be influenced by the fact that the dataset contains information on mafia members’ final convictions. In Italy, proceedings for mafia-related offenses often last many years before reaching a final judgment. For example, the analysis of the data from the Casellario shows that on average Italian courts issue definitive judgments (i.e. irrevocable sentences) 6 years after the commission of the mafia association crime.
- 10.
The year of the first mafia association offence is employed as a proxy for the timing of entrance into the mafia organization. This methodological choice may present some flaws linked to the imprecision of the year of crime variable and to the possibility that mafia offenders committed some mafia association crimes at younger ages that might have gone undetected by law enforcement authorities. Nonetheless, some robustness checks relying on building time-buffers that “move” the year of recruitment to 1, 2 and 3 years before and after the year of the first mafia association crime showed that the choice of this last variable as year of entrance into the mafia organization is fairly robust (Savona et al. 2017a).
- 11.
Most results are robust to the change in the age limit defining “early” and “late” recruits (Savona et al. 2017a).
- 12.
Crimes have been grouped through a Principal Component Analysis that enabled to identify relevant correlations across the 31 crime categories and reduce them into six groupings (Savona et al. 2017a).
- 13.
“associative crimes” excludes the mafia association crimes, thus grouping together the crimes of “criminal association” and “drug trafficking criminal association”.
- 14.
These statistics refer to the mafia association variable before data imputation, see Section 6 for more details.
- 15.
These considerations arise from logistic regression models having as dependent variable the offender’s mafia association (Savona et al. 2017a, p. 227).
- 16.
The initial 11,144 mafia members were filtered based on the number of crimes they committed, maintaining in the sample only those members who committed at least four crimes. For each member was then computed the probability that crimes with no year were the first or last crimes of the member’s career. These two passages lowered the sample size from 11,144 to 5993.
- 17.
To test the robustness of the choice of the year of the first mafias offence as a proxy for the recruitment year, we calculated the distributions of the dimensions moving the recruitment moment backwards in time of 1, 3 and 5 years. The analyses focused on those members with information about all the six different dimensions, and on the four time-buffers defined for 0, 1, 3 and 5 years. The correlation was computed, for each dimension, before and after recruitment, and across the time-buffers. Results show strong correlations on average, pointing out the robustness of the choice. Further details about the robustness checks are in (Savona et al. 2017a).
- 18.
The offence of mafia association is excluded from the calculation of the seriousness, as it would have increased the average seriousness score for all mafia members.
References
Albini, J. L. (1971). The American Mafia: Genesis of a legend. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Antimafia, D. I. (2002). Relazione del Ministro dell’Interno al Parlamento sull’attività svolta e sui risultati conseguiti dalla Direzione Investigativa Antimafia. 1° Semestre 2002. In Rome.
Berlusconi, G. (2014). Italian Mafia. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. New York: Springer.
Blokland, A. a. J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending∗. Criminology, 43(4), 1203–1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00037.x.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. A. (1986). Criminal careers and ‘career criminals’ (National Research Council (U S.) panel on research on criminal careers). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Farrington, D. P. (1988). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1988.tb00829.x.
Carvalho, L. S., & Soares, R. R. (2016). Living on the edge: Youth entry, career and exit in drug-selling gangs. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 121, 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.018.
Ciconte, E. (1992). ‘Ndrangheta dall’unità a oggi. Bari: Editori Laterza.
Ciconte, E. (2014). Origins and development of the ‘Ndrangheta. In N. Serenata (Ed.), The ‘Ndrangheta and Sacra Corona Unita (Vol. 12, pp. 33–50). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04930-4_3.
Commissione Parlamentare Antimafia. (2012). Relazione sulla prima fase dei lavori della Commissione, con particolare riguardo al condizionamento delle mafie sull’economia, sulla societa` e sulle istituzioni del Mezzogiorno. Commissione Parlamentare d’Inchiesta sul Fenomeno della Mafia e sulle altre Associazioni Criminali, anche Straniere, Doc. XXIII, n. 9, XVI legislatura. Rome.
Commissione Parlamentare Antimafia. (2018). Relazione conclusiva. Rome: Commissione parlamentare di inchiesta sul fenomenodella mafia e sulle altre associazioni criminali, anche straniere. Doc. XXIII, n. 38, Rome.
Europol. (2013). Threat assessment: Italian organized crime. In June.
Farrington, D. P. (1992). Criminal career research in the United Kingdom. The British Journal of Criminology, 32(4), 521–536.
Farrington, D. P., MacLeod, J. F., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Mathematical models of criminal careers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(3), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815620237.
Francis, B., Humphreys, L., Kirby, S., & Soothill, K. (2013). Understanding criminal careers in organised crime (Report). Home Office. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/67009/. Accessed 19 Oct 2017.
Fuller, G., Morgan, A., & Brown, R. (2019). Criminal histories of Australian organised crime offenders (no. 567). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1968). Delinquents and nondelinquents in perspective. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Press. Accessed 20 Jan 2018.
Hess, H. (1993). Mafia: Le origini e la struttura. Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza.
Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2013). A note on a Stata plugin for estimating group-based trajectory models. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(4), 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113503141.
Kleemans, E. R., & de Poot, C. J. (2008). Criminal careers in organized crime and social opportunity structure. European Journal of Criminology, 5(1), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807084225.
Kleemans, E. R., & van Koppen, M. V. (2014). Careers in organized crime. In D. Weisburd & G. Bruinsma (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. New York: Springer.
Kyvsgaard, B. (2002). The criminal career: The Danish longitudinal study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657324.
Lussier, P., Tzoumakis, S., Cale, J., & Amirault, J. (2010). Criminal trajectories of adult sex offenders and the age effect: Examining the dynamic aspect of offending in adulthood. International Criminal Justice Review, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567710368360.
Massari, M. (2014). The Sacra Corona Unita: Origins, characteristics, and strategies. In The ‘Ndrangheta and Sacra Corona Unita (pp. 101–116). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04930-4_7.
Nagin, D. S. (2016). Group-based trajectory modeling and criminal career research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815611710.
Paoli, L. (2008). The decline of the Italian mafia. In Organized crime: Culture, markets and policies (pp. 15–28). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74733-0_2.
Paoli, L. (2014). The Italian mafia. In L. Paoli (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organized crime (pp. 121–141). New York: Oxford University Press.
Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. Crime and Justice, 30, 359–506.
Piquero, A. R., Raymond, P., Paul, M., Robert, B., & Charles W. D. (1999). Onset Age and Offense Specialization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(3), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427899036003002.
Rhodes, W. (1989). The Criminal Career: Estimates of the Duration and Frequency of Crime Commission. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066259.
Sales, I. (2015). Storia dell’Italia mafiosa: perché le mafie hanno avuto successo. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Savona, E. U., Calderoni, F., Campedelli, G. M., Comunale, T., Ferrarini, M., & Meneghini, C. (2017a). Recruitment into mafias: criminal careers of mafia members and mafia bosses (report on factors relating to OC) (pp. 192–312). Milan: UCSC-Transcrime. https://www.projectproton.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/D1.1-Report-on-factors-relating-to-OC.pdf.
Savona, E. U., Calderoni, F., Superchi, E., Comunale, T., Campedelli, G. M., Marchesi, M. E., & Kamprad, A. (2017b). Systematic review of the social, psychological and economic factors relating to criminalisation and recruitment to OC (report on factors relating to OC) (pp. 5–71). Milan: UCSC-Transcrime. https://www.projectproton.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/D1.1-Report-on-factors-relating-to-OC.pdf.
Serenata, N. (2014). Introduction. In N. Serenata (Ed.), The ‘Ndrangheta and Sacra Corona Unita (Vol. 12, pp. 1–13). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04930-4_1.
van de Rakt, M., Murray, J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012). The long-term effects of paternal imprisonment on criminal trajectories of children. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810393018.
Van Koppen, M. V., de Poot, C. J., Kleemans, E. R., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2010). Criminal trajectories in organized crime. The British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azp067.
van Onna, J. H. R., van der Geest, V. R., Huisman, W., & Denkers, A. J. M. (2014). Criminal trajectories of white-collar offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(6), 759–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814531489.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Savona, E.U., Calderoni, F., Campedelli, G.M., Comunale, T., Ferrarini, M., Meneghini, C. (2020). The Criminal Careers of Italian Mafia Members. In: Weisburd, D., Savona, E.U., Hasisi, B., Calderoni, F. (eds) Understanding Recruitment to Organized Crime and Terrorism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36639-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36639-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36638-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36639-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)