Abstract
Governmental requirements of making use of evidence-based treatments on one side, and the family therapy field’s pluralism on knowledge sources on the other, may create a dilemma for the systemic clinician. This dilemma has also an epistemological relevance on research within the systemic field, addressing which research questions are relevant and needed, as well as applying the appropriate research methodology suited to answer these questions. This dilemma is in this chapter viewed in the light of two domains of knowledge, idiographic and nomothetic, that again are discussed from two perspectives: the sources of knowledge defined in evidence-based practice, combined with three levels of evidence. Central in this discussion is the objective of user involvement by applying systematic feedback that is suggested as a means to integrate the nomothetic and idiographic levels of knowledge. Further, it is also discussed how user involvement may work constructively to the dilemma between professional autonomy and increased governmental requirements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Evidence Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271
Anderson, H. (2016). Postmodern/poststructural/social construction therapies. In T. L. Sexton & J. Lebow (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 182–204). New York, NY: Routledge.
Anderson, T., Ogles, B. M., Patterson, C. L., Lambert, M. J., & Vermeersch, D. A. (2009). Therapist effects: Facilitative interpersonal skills as a predictor of therapist success. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(7), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20583
Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015). Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 6–19.
Castonguay, L. G., & Muran, C. (2015). Fostering collaboration between researchers and clinicians through building practice-oriented research: An introduction. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 1–5.
Duncan, B., Miller, S., & Sparks, J. (2000). The heroic client. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Duncan, B. L., & Reese, R. J. (2013). Empirically supported treatments, evidence-based treatments, and evidence-based practice. In I. B. Winer (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 489–513). Hoboken, NJ: Wiely.
Ekeland, T.-J., Aurdal, Å., & Skjelten, I. M. (2014). Når staten vil være terapeut. Fokus på familien, 42, 139–156.
Gondek, D., Edbrooke-Childs, J., Fink, E., Deighton, J., & Wolpert, M. (2016). Feedback from outcome measures and treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice: A systematic review. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43, 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0710-5
Gullestad, S. E. (2001). Hva er evidensbasert psykoterapi? Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 38, 942–951. ISSN 0332-6470.
Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 61, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.2002/jclp.20108
Heatherington, L., Friedlander, M. L., Diamond, G. M., Escudero, V., & Pinsof, W. M. (2015). 25 years of systemic therapies research: Progress and promise. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 348–364.
Hoffart, A. (2017). Terapiforskningen trenger en ideografisk vending. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 54(2), 210–212.
Holmquist, R., Phillips, B., & Barkham, M. (2015). Developing practice-based evidence: Benefits, challenges, and tensions. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.861093
Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy. Efficacy, effectiveness and client progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064.
Lambert, M. J., Garfield, S. L., & Bergin, A. E. (2004). Overview, trends, and future issues. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 805–821). New York, NY: Wiley.
Lutz, W., De Jong, K., & Rubel, J. (2015). Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: Where are we and where do we want to go? Psychotherapy Research, 25(6), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1079661
McHugh, R. K., & Barlow, D. H. (2012). Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological interventions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nissen-Lie, H. A., Monsen, J. T., Ulleberg, P., & Rønnestad, M. H. (2013). Psychotherapists’ self-reports of their interpersonal functioning and difficulties in practice as predictors of patient outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 23(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.735775
Oanes, C. J., Karlson, B., & Borg, M. (2017). User involvement in therapy: Couples’ and family therapists’ lived experiences with the inclusion of a feedback procedure in clinical practice. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 38, 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1232
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. (1975). American comedy-drama film directed by Miloš Forman, based on the 1962 novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey.
Pinsof, W. M., & Lebow, J. L. (2005). A scientific paradigm for family psychology. In W. M. Pinsof & J. L. Lebow (Eds.), Family psychology. The art of science (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Oxford.
Pinsof, W. M., & Wynne, L. C. (2000). Toward progress research: Closing the gap between family therapy practice and research. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 26, 1–8.
Rohrbaugh, M. J. (2014). Old wine in new bottles. Decanting systemic family process research in the era of evidence-based practice. Family Process, 53, 434–444.
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Goals and confidence as self-regulatory elements underlying health and illness behavior. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The self-regulation of health and illness behavior (pp. 17–41). London, UK: Taylor Francis.
Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019247
Sundet, R. (2017). Feedback as means to enhance client-therapist interaction in therapy. In T. Tilden & B. E. Wampold (Eds.), Routine outcome monitoring in couple and family therapy. The empirically informed therapist (pp. 121–142). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Tilden, T. (2017). How can I know whether my efforts are helpful for the client? Implementing feedback in Norway. In T. Tilden & B. E. Wampold (Eds.), Routine outcome monitoring in couple and family therapy. The empirically informed therapist (pp. 3–13). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Tilden, T., & Wampold, B. E. (Eds.). (2017). Routine outcome monitoring in couple and family therapy. The empirically informed therapist. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ulvestad, A. K., & Henriksen, A. K. (2007). I skyggen av elfenbenstårnet. In A. K. Ulvestad, A. K. Henriksen, A.-G. Tuseth, & T. Fjeldstad (Eds.), Klienten – den glemte terapeut. Brukerstyring i psykisk helsearbeid (pp. 20–27). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
Utvåg, K. M., Steinkopf, S., & Holgersen, H. (2014). Vilkår for klinisk autonomi og dens betydning for praksis. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 51, 861–867.
Walfish, S., McAlister, B., O’Donnell, P., & Lambert, M. J. (2012). An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.07.17.pr0.110.2.639-644
Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The research evidence for what works in psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
WHO. (1986). http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/about/HPR%20Glossary%201998.pdf. Retrieved from internet April 26. 2018.
Zahl-Olsen, R., & Oanes, C. J. (2017). An anthill of questions that made me prepare for the first session. In T. Tilden & B. E. Wampold (Eds.), Routine outcome monitoring in couple and family therapy. The empirically informed therapist (pp. 121–142). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tilden, T. (2020). The Idiographic Voice in a Nomothetic World: Why Client Feedback Is Essential in Our Professional Knowledge. In: Ochs, M., Borcsa, M., Schweitzer, J. (eds) Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling. European Family Therapy Association Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36559-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36560-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)