Skip to main content

Sustainable Development of Fisheries Communities: The Role of Community-Led Local Development Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regional Intelligence

Abstract

The environmental problems that dominate the present day are the result of increasing pressure on natural resources. It is therefore essential to understand what the reasons are why individuals and society make choices that lead to the depletion of natural resources and what are the guidelines that could/should be used to promote their sustainable management. For many communities around the world, the disturbance of these marine ecosystems impacts the local residents, both socially and economically. Fisheries management experts recognize that the underlying causes of fisheries resource overexploitation and coastal environmental degradation are often of social, economic, institutional and/or political origins. Around the world in recent decades, awareness has emerged that the management and governance of the ocean, coastal zones and human activities associated with it should be addressed as an ecosystem approach, not sectoral but integrated. Policy interventions, if they are to bring about lasting solutions, must address these concerns. With the growing emphasis on ecosystem-based management, there is an expanding need for measures of social well-being and sustainability, including resilience and vulnerability, for coastal fisheries and fishing communities. The Priority Axis 4 of the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) focuses on the sustainable development of fisheries areas, and it was introduced into the EFF for the first time in the period 2007–2013. It provides accompanying measures aimed at the conversion of areas affected by the restructuring of the fisheries sector. In many cases, these cannot be dealt with by traditional policies and tools on their own. In this respect, Axis 4 is similar to the Leader ‘area-based approach’ to development in rural areas. Axis 4 of the European Fisheries Fund is a tool for fisheries communities to drive development locally. It is implemented by private–public partnerships called Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs). These groups are made up of representatives from fisheries and aquaculture and from all parts of the community. Together they prepare and implement a local development strategy for their area. Throughout Europe, more than 300 of these FLAGs have already generated several thousand projects adapted to local needs. In the Algarve region (Portugal) there are currently two FLAGs active, one in the ‘barlavento’ and the other one in the ‘sotavento’ area. With the current paper, we want to take stock of some of their emerging results and achievements. Given the increased prominence of community-led local development strategies in the new European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMMF) and other EU funding programmes for the operational programming period 2014–2020, we want to assess what Axis 4 has offered so far to those fisheries communities and the roles which FLAGs can and should be playing to address the challenges and opportunities facing their territories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing conducted by vessels or countries that are part of a fisheries organization but violate the rules, or operate in waters without permission; caught by vessels without reporting to relevant authorities; or conducted by vessels under the flag of a country they are not part of, or not part of a fishery organization, is a serious global problem that contributes to overfishing, creates unfair competition and impedes sustainable fisheries. As a result of this, improved monitoring, control and surveillance has been an important preoccupation of fisheries policy makers for decades. Also, fish retailers are concerned about where their seafood comes from, spurring demand from informed consumers. The EU is working to close the loopholes that allow illegal operators to profit from their activities:

    • The EU regulation to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU) entered into force on 1 January 2010.

    • Only marine fisheries products validated as legal by the competent flag state or exporting state can be imported to or exported from the EU.

    • An IUU vessel list is issued regularly, based on IUU vessels identified by Regional Fisheries Management Organisations.

    • The IUU Regulation also offers the possibility to blacklist states that turn a blind eye to illegal fishing activities.

    • EU operators who fish illegally anywhere in the world, under any flag, face substantial penalties proportionate to the economic value of their catch, which deprive them of any profit.

  2. 2.

    Output controls mainly consist of limiting the amount of fish from a particular fishery, in particular through total allowable catches (see TACs and quotas). Total allowable catches (TACs) or fishing opportunities are catch limits (expressed in tonnes or numbers) that are set for most commercial fish stocks. The Commission prepares the proposals, based on scientific advice on the stock status from advisory bodies such as ICES and STECF. Some multi-annual plans contain rules for the setting of the TACs. TACs are set annually for most stocks (every two years for deep-sea stocks) by the Council of fisheries ministers. For stocks that are shared and jointly managed with non-EU countries, the TACs are agreed with those (groups of) non-EU countries. TACs are shared between EU countries in the form of national quotas. For each stock, a different allocation percentage per EU country is applied for the sharing out of the quotas. This fixed percentage is known as the relative stability key. EU countries can exchange quotas with other EU countries.

References

  • Boyd, H., & Charles, A. (2006). Creating community-based indicators to monitor sustainability of local fisheries. Oceans and Coastal Management, 49, 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, B., Krause, G., & Rosenthal, H. (2004). Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: The prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints. Ocean and Coastal Management, 47, 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCDR Algarve—Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve. (2007). PROT ALGARVE—Plano Regional de Ordenamento Territorial do Algarve. Faro: CCDR Algarve.

    Google Scholar 

  • CE—Comissão Europeia. (2010). A Política Comum da Pesca em números: dados estatísticos de base (ed. 2010). Luxemburgo: Serviço das Publicações Oficiais das Comunidades Europeias.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. (1952). Resource conservation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. (1968). Resource conservation: Economics and policies (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNADS—Conselho Nacional do Ambiente e do Desenvolvimento Sustentável. (2001). Projecto de Reflexão sobre o Desenvolvimento Sustentável da Zona Costeira (GTZC—5ª versão prov.01.02.13). Lisboa: CNADS.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMAM—Estrutura de Missão para os Assuntos do Mar. (2007). Estratégia Nacional para o Mar. Lisboa: Ministério da Defesa Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2009). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2008. Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2014). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture opportunities and challenges 2014. Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido, A. (2001). Henrique Tenreiro—«Patrão das Pescas» e Guardião do Estado Novo. Análise Social, 36(160), 839–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, E., Mortensen, A., Vikesland, M., & Cappelen, A. (n.d.). Attracting the winners. The competitiveness of five European maritime industries. Available from http://menon.no/upload/2011/09/28/attracting_the_winners.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2012.

  • Krautkraemer, J. (2005, April). Economics of natural resource scarcity: The state of the debate (Discussion Paper 05-14, Resources for the Future).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, F., & Cunha, P. (2010). A plataforma continental algarvia e províncias adjacentes: Uma análise geomorfológica. In J. Neiva, A. Ribeiro, M. Victor, F. Noronha, & M. Ramalho (Eds.), Ciências Geológicas: Ensino, Investigação e sua História (Vol. I—Geologia Clássica) (pp. 479–490). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Geólogos/Sociedade Geológica de Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, K. (2004). The feasibility of using zoning to reduce conflicts in the exclusive economic zone. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal, 11, 183–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2004). Understanding collective action. In R. Meinzen-Dick & M. Di Gregorio (Eds.), Collective action and property rights for sustainable development. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, T. (2004). Aquaculture and the environment (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, R. (2011). Institutional dynamics in community-based Fisheries Resource Management for sustainable development of marine fisheries in Kerala. Kerala: Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT).

    Google Scholar 

  • SaeR—Sociedade de Avaliação de Empresas e Risco. (2009). O Hypercluster da Economia do Mar: Um Domínio de Potencial Estratégico para o Desenvolvimento da Economia Portuguesa. Lisboa: SaeR/Associação Comercial de Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. L. (2012). Toward inclusive co-management: Factors influencing stakeholder participation. Coastal Management, 40(3), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, H., Hansen, L., Hansen, R., Hammarlund, K., Thorpe, T., & McCullen, P. (2003). Social planning and environmental impact. Results from the work of the European Thematic Network on Wave Energy (WaveNet) (pp. 305–377). Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Monteiro, P.V., de Noronha, T. (2020). Sustainable Development of Fisheries Communities: The Role of Community-Led Local Development Policies. In: Vaz, E. (eds) Regional Intelligence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36479-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics