Skip to main content

Computational Polyetheylene-Ceramic Composite Plate Design and Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
TMS 2020 149th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

  • 5756 Accesses

Abstract

A computational study on the feasibility of increasing the weight-to-protection ratio of polyethylene armored plates by adding local ceramic inserts into the polymer matrix. A computational study was conducted using ANSYS /AUTODYNE software to observe the behavior of the materials under high-velocity impact conditions. Results indicate that efficacy is highly variable based on the geometry and density of the ceramic inserts. Additional studies indicate that the presence of high-density inserts create localizations of high stress and can increase the impact resistance of the by plate by reducing the penetration depth of an impactor by up to 50%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. United States, Congress, Justice Programs (2008) Ballistic resistance of body armor NIJ Standard-0101.06. Office of Law Enforcement Standards of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baniasadi M et al (2015) High-performance coils and yarns of polymeric piezoelectric nanofibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(9):5358–5366. https://doi.org/10.1021/am508812a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Iijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 363(6430):603–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/363603a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurtz S (1999) Advances in the processing, sterilization, and cross-linking of ultra-High molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. Biomaterials 20(18):1659–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00053-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobieraj MC, Rimnac CM (2009) Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene: mechanics, morphology, and clinical behavior. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2(5):433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.12.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Armor UP, Dba LP (n.d.) Retrieved from http://bulletproofme.com/RP-Polyethylene.html

  7. Jain V et al (2003) Effect of rubber encapsulation on the comparative mechanical behaviour of ceramic honeycomb and foam. Mater Sci Eng A 347(1–2):109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5093(02)00587-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Colombo P et al (2012) Ceramic-polymer composites for ballistic protection. In: Ceramic transactions series ceramic armor and armor systems II, pp 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118408100.ch7

  9. Colombo P et al (2006) Ceramic–polymer composites for ballistic protection. Adv Appl Ceram 105(2):78–83. https://doi.org/10.1179/174367606x84440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Colombo P, Medvedovski E, Zordan F (2012) Ceramic-polymer composites for ballistic protection. In: Ceramic armor and armor systems II, pp 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118408100.ch7

  11. Medvedovski E (2013) Lightweight ceramic composite armour system. Adv Appl Ceram 105(5):241–245. https://doi.org/10.1179/174367606x113537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Navarro C et al (1993) Some observations on the normal impact on ceramic faced armours backed by composite plates. Int J Impact Eng 13(1):145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743x(93)90113-l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo X et al (2016) Simulation of ballistic performance of a two-layered structure of nanostructured metal and ceramic. Compos Struct 157:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marx J et al (2019) Ballistic performance of composite metal foam against large caliber threats. In: Composite structures, p 111032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111032

  15. Colombo P et al (2006) Ceramic-polymer composites for ballistic protection. Adv Appl Ceram 105(2):78–83. https://doi.org/10.1179/174367606x84440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. ANSYS Inc (2019) Engineering simulation & 3D design software. ANSYS, 22 Mar 2019. www.ansys.com/

  17. Sanborn B et al (2014) Tensile properties of Dyneema SK76 single fibers at multiple loading rates using a direct gripping method. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada606636

  18. Marx J et al (2019) Ballistic performance of composite metal foam against large caliber threats. Compos Struct 225:111032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fountzoulas CG et al (2019) In: Proceedings of the 23rd international symposium on ballistics, II, conference proceeding, 16 Apr 2009, pp 1039–1047

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holmquist TJ, Johnson GR, Gooch WA (2005) Modeling of the 14.5 mm BS41 projectile for ballistic impact computations. In: 2nd international conference on computational ballistics, Cordoba, Spain, 18–20 May 2005, pp 61–77

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21(1):31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was sponsored by the Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-15-2-0020. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory or the US Government. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Montana University System Collaborative Materials Science Ph.D. Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trenin K. Bayless .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bayless, T.K., Downey, J., Lucon, P., Coguill, S. (2020). Computational Polyetheylene-Ceramic Composite Plate Design and Optimization. In: TMS 2020 149th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36296-6_138

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics