Skip to main content

Autonomy and the Principles of Medical Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Bioethical Controversies in Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

Respect for patient autonomy is an important and indispensable principle in the ethical practice of clinical medicine. Legal tenets recognize the centrality of this principle and the inherent right of patients of sound mind—properly informed—to make their own personal medical decisions. In the course of everyday medical practice however, challenging cases may result in ethical dilemmas for the patient, the physician, and society. Resolution of these dilemmas requires a thorough understanding of the underlying principles that allow the clinician to make informed decisions and to offer considered therapeutic options to the patient. We argue in this chapter that there is also need for a transition of moral competency from understanding principles to attaining virtue in the classic Aristotelian tradition. Achieving moral virtue is based on a lifetime of learning, practicing, and watching how others, who have achieved virtue, act and perform their duties. We further claim that learning moral virtue in medical practice is best realized by incorporating the lessons in daily rounds where frank discussions and considered resolutions can occur under the leadership of senior practitioners who have achieved a semblance of moral excellence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Aristotle’s word is “hexis”—sometimes translated as “habit.” The important point is that it is not a momentary state, but an enduring disposition to feel and to act in a certain way.

References

  1. Berg JW, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Parker LS. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook T, Mavroudis CD, Jacobs JP, Mavroudis C. Respect for autonomy as a virtue in clinical medicine. Cardiol Young. 2015;25:1615–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Plato. Meno, translated by W.K.C. Guthrie. In: Hamilton E, Cairns H, editors. The collected dialogues, Bollingen series LXXI. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Plato. Republic, translated by Paul Shorey. In: Hamilton E, Cairns H, editors. The collected dialogues, Bollingen series LXXI. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aristotle: the Nicomachean ethics, Book III (Translated by Sir David Ross). London: Oxford University Press; 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MacIntyre A. After virtue: a study in moral theory. 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MacIntyre A. Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nozick R. The nature of rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kant I. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals [1785] (translated by James Wesley Ellington). Indianapolis: Hackett Pub Co.; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mill JS. Utilitarianism. 1st ed. London: Parker, Son & Bourn, West Strand; 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mill JS. On liberty. 2nd ed. London: Parker, Son, & Bourn West Strand; 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anscombe GEM. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy. 1958;33:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smart JJC, Williams B. Utilitarianism: for and against. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1973.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagel T. Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor C. Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lyons D. Forms and limits of utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1965.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Stavern I. Beyond utilitarianism and deontology: ethics in economics. Rev Political Econ. 2007;19:21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, Harrison M, Usherwood T, Nass D. Defining professionalism in medical education: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2014;36:47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mavroudis C. Presidential address: a partnership in courage. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(5):1366–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aristotle. The metaphysics. In: Barnes J, editor. The complete works of Aristotle: the revised oxford translation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chamberlain JE, Nisker JA. Residents’ attitudes to training in ethics in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology programs. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:783–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Parker L, Watts L, Scicluna H. Clinical ethics ward rounds: building on the core curriculum. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:501–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wen LS, Baca JT, O’Malley P, Bhatia K, Peak D, Takayesu JK. Implementation of small-group reflection rounds at an emergency medicine residency program. CJEM. 2013;15:175–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Thomas Cook .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cook, J.T., Mavroudis, C., Mavroudis, C.D. (2020). Autonomy and the Principles of Medical Practice. In: Mavroudis, C., Cook, J., Mavroudis, C. (eds) Bioethical Controversies in Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35660-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35660-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35659-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35660-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics