Abstract
Respect for patient autonomy is an important and indispensable principle in the ethical practice of clinical medicine. Legal tenets recognize the centrality of this principle and the inherent right of patients of sound mind—properly informed—to make their own personal medical decisions. In the course of everyday medical practice however, challenging cases may result in ethical dilemmas for the patient, the physician, and society. Resolution of these dilemmas requires a thorough understanding of the underlying principles that allow the clinician to make informed decisions and to offer considered therapeutic options to the patient. We argue in this chapter that there is also need for a transition of moral competency from understanding principles to attaining virtue in the classic Aristotelian tradition. Achieving moral virtue is based on a lifetime of learning, practicing, and watching how others, who have achieved virtue, act and perform their duties. We further claim that learning moral virtue in medical practice is best realized by incorporating the lessons in daily rounds where frank discussions and considered resolutions can occur under the leadership of senior practitioners who have achieved a semblance of moral excellence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Aristotle’s word is “hexis”—sometimes translated as “habit.” The important point is that it is not a momentary state, but an enduring disposition to feel and to act in a certain way.
References
Berg JW, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Parker LS. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Cook T, Mavroudis CD, Jacobs JP, Mavroudis C. Respect for autonomy as a virtue in clinical medicine. Cardiol Young. 2015;25:1615–20.
Plato. Meno, translated by W.K.C. Guthrie. In: Hamilton E, Cairns H, editors. The collected dialogues, Bollingen series LXXI. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1989.
Plato. Republic, translated by Paul Shorey. In: Hamilton E, Cairns H, editors. The collected dialogues, Bollingen series LXXI. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1989.
Aristotle: the Nicomachean ethics, Book III (Translated by Sir David Ross). London: Oxford University Press; 1954.
MacIntyre A. After virtue: a study in moral theory. 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press; 2007.
MacIntyre A. Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame; 1988.
Nozick R. The nature of rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.
Kant I. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals [1785] (translated by James Wesley Ellington). Indianapolis: Hackett Pub Co.; 1993.
Mill JS. Utilitarianism. 1st ed. London: Parker, Son & Bourn, West Strand; 1863.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
Mill JS. On liberty. 2nd ed. London: Parker, Son, & Bourn West Strand; 1859.
Anscombe GEM. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy. 1958;33:1–16.
Smart JJC, Williams B. Utilitarianism: for and against. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1973.
Nagel T. Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1979.
Taylor C. Sources of the self: the making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1989.
Lyons D. Forms and limits of utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1965.
Van Stavern I. Beyond utilitarianism and deontology: ethics in economics. Rev Political Econ. 2007;19:21–35.
Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, Harrison M, Usherwood T, Nass D. Defining professionalism in medical education: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2014;36:47–61.
Mavroudis C. Presidential address: a partnership in courage. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(5):1366–71.
Aristotle. The metaphysics. In: Barnes J, editor. The complete works of Aristotle: the revised oxford translation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1984.
Chamberlain JE, Nisker JA. Residents’ attitudes to training in ethics in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology programs. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:783–6.
Parker L, Watts L, Scicluna H. Clinical ethics ward rounds: building on the core curriculum. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:501–5.
Wen LS, Baca JT, O’Malley P, Bhatia K, Peak D, Takayesu JK. Implementation of small-group reflection rounds at an emergency medicine residency program. CJEM. 2013;15:175–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cook, J.T., Mavroudis, C., Mavroudis, C.D. (2020). Autonomy and the Principles of Medical Practice. In: Mavroudis, C., Cook, J., Mavroudis, C. (eds) Bioethical Controversies in Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35660-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35660-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35659-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35660-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)