Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence for Dramatic Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI*IA 2019 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11946))

Abstract

In the last years, digital media have challenged traditional narrative models with an increasing request for interaction with the user, leading to novel paradigms of storytelling and performance. While most research in interactive storytelling and drama has addressed the role of automation in the story generation process, in this paper we present a framework that relies on Artificial Intelligence techniques to augment the performer–audience interaction in a storytelling setting. Step after step, the emotional response of the audience is automatically detected, the performer decides about her/his attitude towards the audience, and the story is composed and delivered to the audience by the joint systemperformer initiative on an augmented stage. Initially designed as training tool for interactive story editing, the system has been deployed to create a public performance in February 2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.cirma.unito.it/portfolio_page/doppiogioco/.

  2. 2.

    The GEMEP model also encompasses 5 extra emotion types that don’t fit in the dimensional classification (Admiration, Tenderness, Disgust, Contempt, Surprise) and have been omitted from DoPPioGioco.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/docker.

  4. 4.

    https://azure.microsoft.com/id-id/services/cognitive-services/face/.

References

  1. Alrutz, M., Listengarten, J., Wood, M.V.D.: Playing with Theory in Theatre Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aylett, R., Louchart, S.: I contain multitudes: creativity and emergent narrative. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition, pp. 337–340. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aylett, R.S., Louchart, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A., Vala, M.: FearNot! – an experiment in emergent narrative. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 305–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11550617_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bänziger, T., Scherer, K.R.: Introducing the Geneva multimodal emotion portrayal (gemep) corpus. In: Blueprint for Affective Computing, pp. 271–294 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Battaglino, C., Damiano, R., Lesmo, L.: Emotional range in value-sensitive deliberation. In: AAMAS International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, IFAAMAS, vol. 2, pp. 769–776 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baumer, A., Magerko, B.: Narrative development in improvisational theatre. In: Iurgel, I.A., Zagalo, N., Petta, P. (eds.) ICIDS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5915, pp. 140–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10643-9_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Giannachi, G., Walker, B., Marshall, J., Rodden, T.: Uncomfortable interactions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2005–2014. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benford, S., et al.: Discomfort—the dark side of fun. In: Blythe, M., Monk, A. (eds.) Funology 2. HIS, pp. 209–224. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68213-6_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Borowski, M., Sugiera, M.: Worlds in Words: Storytelling in Contemporary Theatre and Playwriting. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A.: DoppioGioco. Playing with the audience in an interactive storytelling platform. In: Barolli, L., Terzo, O. (eds.) CISIS 2017. AISC, vol. 611, pp. 287–298. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61566-0_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A.: Thinning the fourth wall with intelligent prompt. In: Nunes, N., Oakley, I., Nisi, V. (eds.) ICIDS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10690, pp. 206–218. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71027-3_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Foreman-Wernet, L., Dervin, B.: In the context of their lives: how audience members make sense of performing arts experiences. In: The Audience Experience: A Critical Analysis of Audiences in The Performing Arts, pp. 67–82. Chicago: Intellect (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giardina, M., et al.: Conveying audience emotions through humanoid robot gestures to an orchestra during a live musical exhibition. In: Barolli, L., Terzo, O. (eds.) CISIS 2017. AISC, vol. 611, pp. 249–261. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61566-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Latulipe, C., Carroll, E.A., Lottridge, D.: Love, hate, arousal and engagement: exploring audience responses to performing arts. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1845–1854. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, B., Lee-Urban, S., Johnston, G., Riedl, M.: Story generation with crowdsourced plot graphs. In: AAAI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Louchart, S., Truesdale, J., Suttie, N., Aylett, R.: Emergent narrative: past, present and future of an interactive storytelling approach. In: Interactive Digital Narrative. History, Theory and Practice, pp. 185–199. Routledge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marranca, B.: Performance as design: the mediaturgy of john jesurun’s firefall. PAJ: J. Perform. Art 32(3), 16–24 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mateas, M., Stern, A.: Façade: an experiment in building a fully-realized interactive drama. In: Game Developers Conference, vol. 2 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pizzo, A., Lombardo, V., Damiano, R.: Algorithms and interoperability between drama and artificial intelligence. Drama Rev. 63(4), 14–32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Plutchik, R.: Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. Harpercollins College Division (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Riedl, M.O., Young, R.M.: Narrative planning: balancing plot and character. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 39(1), 217–268 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roseman, I.J.: Appraisal in the emotion system: coherence in strategies for coping. Emot. Rev. 5(2), 141–149 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Russell, J.A.: Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol. Rev. 110(1), 145 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scherer, K.R.: Appraisal Theory. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, pp. 637–663 (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Silvia, P.J.: Looking past pleasure: anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 3(1), 48 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stevens, C., Glass, R., Schubert, E., Chen, J., Winskel, H.: Methods for measuring audience reactions. In: Proceedings of the Inaugural International Conference on Music Communication Science, p. 155. HCSNet (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Swartjes, I., Theune, M.: An experiment in improvised interactive drama. In: Nijholt, A., Reidsma, D., Hondorp, H. (eds.) INTETAIN 2009. LNICST, vol. 9, pp. 234–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02315-6_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanenbaum, J.: How i learned to stop worrying and love the gamer: reframing subversive play in story-based games. In: Proceedings of DiGRA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tschacher, W., Greenwood, S., Kirchberg, V., Wintzerith, S., van den Berg, K., Tröndle, M.: Physiological correlates of aesthetic perception of artworks in a museum. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 6(1), 96 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Weallans, A., Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: Distributed drama management: beyond double appraisal in emergent narrative. In: Interactive Storytelling, pp. 132–143 (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rossana Damiano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., Monticone, G., Pizzo, A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence for Dramatic Performance. In: Alviano, M., Greco, G., Scarcello, F. (eds) AI*IA 2019 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11946. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35166-3_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35166-3_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35165-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35166-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics