Abstract
Sharing systems require some form of organization and negotiation for optimal access to the resource and price discovery. Various forms of organizations are introduced and discussed here, from pool-based to peer-to-peer, also considering a community-based approach. These various organizations are motivated, the related negotiation mechanisms described and their properties discussed. The example of electric energy sharing is used as a basis for discussion and illustration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“Prosumer” is the generic term for those agents that can both supply and consume. The term “prosumer” literally comes from merging the terms “producer” and “consumer”.
References
Alvaro-Hermana R, Fraile-Ardanuy J, Zufiria PJ, Knapen L, Janssens D (2016) Peer to peer energy trading with electric vehicles. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag 8(3):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2016.2573178
Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J (2011) Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found Trends Mach Learn 3(1):1–122. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000016
Day RH (1971) Rational choice and economic behavior. Theory Decis 1(3):229–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139569
Moret F, Pinson P (2018) Energy collectives: a community and fairness based approach to future electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 99:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2808961
Morstyn T, Farrell N, Darby SJ, McCulloch MD (2018) Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants. Nat Energy 3(2):94–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0075-y
Morstyn T, Teytelboym A, McCulloch MD (2018) Bilateral contract networks for peer-to-peer energy trading. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 99:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2786668
Parag Y, Sovacool BK (2016) Electricity market design for the prosumer era. Nat Energy 1:16,032. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.32
Peter C (2017) Electricity market design. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 33(4):589–612
Raworth K (2017) Doughnut economics - seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Cornerstone, San Diego
Reuben E, Suetens S (2012) Revisiting strategic versus non-strategic cooperation. Exp Econ 15(1):24–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9286-4
Sorin E, Bobo LA, Pinson P (2017) Consensus-based approach to peer-to-peer electricity markets with product differentiation. Under review
Acknowledgements
The authors are partly supported by the Danish Innovation Fund and the ForskEL programme through the projects ‘5s’—Future Electricity Markets (12-132636/DSF), CITIES (DSF-1305-00027B) and The Energy Collective (grant no. 2016-1-12530). In addition, the authors thank Etienne Sorin, Lucien Bobo, Tiago Sousa, Roman Le Goff Latimier, Hamid Ben Ahmed and many others for inspiring discussions and input on sharing electric energy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinson, P., Moret, F., Baroche, T., Papakonstantinou, A. (2020). Negotiation Approaches for Sharing Systems. In: Crisostomi, E., Ghaddar, B., Häusler, F., Naoum-Sawaya, J., Russo, G., Shorten, R. (eds) Analytics for the Sharing Economy: Mathematics, Engineering and Business Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35032-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35032-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35031-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35032-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)