Abstract
It is well known that bacteria and host cells are in a competitive race for the surfaces of dental and orthopedic implants. If bacteria win the race and a biofilm forms, this can lead to infection, and postsurgical complications that may include revision procedures and increased hospital stays can cost thousands of dollars for a single patient, significant lost time from work, altered and restricted lifestyles, and, death. Bone infections are treated with antibiotics given intravenously or orally, via antibiotic-releasing bone cement or collagen sponges placed directly within the infected area. Collectively, these approaches have limited effectiveness due to the lack of site specificity, uncontrolled release, and additional surgeries. Antibiotics currently in use suffer from systemic toxicity, short half-life, and increases in bacterial resistance. This chapter will cover topics related to antimicrobial biomaterials (e.g., antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, etc.), antimicrobial coatings, antimicrobial drug delivery vehicles, as well as research integrating both antimicrobial and osteoinductive/osteoconductive properties. Antibiotic resistance and implants ineffective in inhibiting antimicrobial growth offer to shift the race in favor of bacteria. Strategies designed to increase bacterial resistance and offer a supportive environment for resistant pre-osteoblasts and osteoblasts will also be discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Christenson E, Anseth K, van den Beucken J, Chan CB, Orcan B (2007) Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics. J Orthop Res 25:1122
Cram P, Lu X, Kates S, Singh J, Li Y, Wolf B (2012) Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991–2010. JAMA 308(12):1227–1236
Ruiz D, Koeinig L, Dall T, Gallo P, Narzikul A, Parvizi P, Tongue J (2013) The direct and indirect costs to society of treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1473–1480. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01488
Romanò C, Romanò D, Logoluso N, Drago L (2011) Bone and joint infections in adults: a comprehensive classification proposal. Eur Orthop Traumatol 1(6):207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-011-0056-8
Bejon P, Robinson E (2013) Bone and joint infection. Medicine 41(12):719–722
Sanchez CJ, Ward CL, Romano DR, Hurtgen BJ, Hardy SK, Woodbury RL, Trevino AV, Rathbone CR, Wenke JC (2013) Staphylococcus aureus biofilms decrease osteoblast viability, inhibits osteogenic differentiation, and increases bone resorption in vitro. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:187
Hatzenbueler J, Pulling TJ (2011) Diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis. Am Fam Physician 84(9):1027–1033
Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475
Ensrud KE (2013) Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68:1236–1242
Marino JT, Ziran BH (2010) Use of solid and cancellous autologous bone graft for fractures and nonunions. Orthop Clin North Am 41:15–26
Wang W, Yeung KWK (2017) Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: a review. Bioactive Mater 2:224–247
O’Keefe RJ, Mao J (2011) Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: from discovery to the clinic—an overview. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17:389–392
Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP (2012) Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:363–408
Szpalski C, Wetterau M, Barr J, Warren SM (2012) Bone tissue engineering: current strategies and techniques−part I: scaffolds. Tissue Eng Pt B 18(4):246–257
Tiffany N, Kasper FK, Mikos AG (2012) Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64(12):1292–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016
Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P T 39(10):704–711
Mills DK (2015) Future medicine: the impact of 3D printing. J Nanomater Mol Nanotechnol 4(3):1–3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-8777.1000163
Suresh R, Borkar SN, Sawant VA, Shende VS, Dimble SK (2010) Nanoclay drug delivery system. Int J Pharma Sci Nanotech 3(2):901–905
Kotal M, Bhowmick AK (2015) Polymer nanocomposites from modified clays: recent advances and challenges. Prog Polym Sci 51:127–187
Li P-R, Wei J-C, Chiu Y-F, Su H-L, Peng F-C, Lin J-J (2010) Evaluation on cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the exfoliated silicate nanoclay. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2(6):1608–1613
Peña-Parás L, Sánchez-Fernández JA, Vidaltamayo R (2017) Nanoclays for biomedical applications. Handb Ecomater:1–19
Zhanga Y, Tang A, Yang H, Jing Ouyanga J (2016) Applications and interfaces of halloysite nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 119(1):8–17
Lvov Y, Wang W, Zhang L, Fakhrullin R (2016) Halloysite clay nanotubes for loading and sustained release of functional compounds. Adv Mater 28:1227–1250
Du M, Guo B, Jia D (2010) Newly emerging applications of halloysite nanotubes: a review. Polym Int 59:574–582
Rawtani D, Agrawal YK (2012) Multifarious applications of halloysite nanotubes: a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 30:282–295
Yuan P, Tan D, Annabi-Bergaya F (2015) Properties and applications of halloysite nanotubes: recent research advances and future prospects. Appl Clay Sci 112–113:75–93
Liu M, Wu C, Jiao Y, Xiong S, Zhou C (2013) Chitosan-halloysite nanotubes nanocomposite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 1(15):2078–2089
Santos AC et al (2018) Halloysite clay nanotubes for life sciences applications: from drug encapsulation to bioscaffold. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 257:58–70
Weisman J, Jammalamadaka U, Tappa K, Mills D (2017) Doped halloysite nanotubes for use in the 3D printing of medical devices. Bioengineering 4(4):96
Weisman JA, Nicholson JC, Tappa K, Jammalamadaka U, Wilson CG, Mills D (2015) Antibiotic and chemotherapeutic enhanced three-dimensional printer filaments and constructs for biomedical applications. Int J Nanomedicine 10:357–370
Mills DK, Jammalamadaka U, Tappa K, Weisman J (2018) Studies on the cytocompatibility, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of 3D printed poly(methyl methacrylate) beads. Bioact Mater 3(2):157–166
Li Y, MacIel D, Tomás H, Rodrigues J, Ma H, Shi X (2011) PH sensitive Laponite/alginate hybrid hydrogels: swelling behaviour and release mechanism. Soft Matter 7(13):6231–6238
Viseras C, Cerezo P, Sanchez R, Salcedo I, Aguzzi C (2010) Current challenges in clay minerals for drug delivery. Appl Clay Sci 48(3):291–295
Uddin F (2018) Montmorillonite: an introduction to properties and utilization. IntechOpen, London
Katti KS, Katti DR, Dash R (2008) Synthesis and characterization of a novel chitosan/montmorillonite/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 3(3):034122
Jiao L et al (2017) Preparation, characterization, antimicrobial and cytotoxicity studies of copper/zinc- loaded montmorillonite. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 8(1):27
Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H (2007) An increasing threat in hospitals: Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol 5(12):939
Turner RJ (2017) Metal-based antimicrobial strategies. J Microbial Biotechnol 10(5):1062–1065
Slavin YN, Asnis J, Häfeli UO, Bach H (2017) Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. J Nanobiotechnol 15(1):65
Paladini F, Pollini M, Sannino A, Ambrosio L (2015) Metal-based antibacterial substrates for biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 16(7):1873–1885
Ewald A, Glückermann SK, Thull R, Gbureck U (2006) Antimicrobial titanium/silver PVD coatings on titanium. Biomed Eng Online 5(1):22
Cheng H et al (2016) Strontium (Sr) and silver (Ag) loaded nanotubular structures with combined osteoinductive and antimicrobial activities. Acta Biomater 31:388–400
Memarzadeh K, Sharili AS, Huang J, Rawlinson SCF, Allaker RP (2015) Nanoparticulate zinc oxide as a coating material for orthopedic and dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res Pt A 103(3):981–989
Wan YZ, Raman S, He F, Huang Y (2007) Surface modification of medical metals by ion implantation of silver and copper. Vacuum 81(9):1114–1118
Garza-Cervantes JA, Chávez-Reyes A, Castillo EC et al (2017) Synergistic antimicrobial effects of silver/transition-metal combinatorial treatments. Sci Rep 7(1):903
Vaidya MY, McBain AJ, Butler JA, Banks CE, Whitehead KA (2017) Antimicrobial efficacy and synergy of metal ions against enterococcus faecium, klebsiella pneumoniae and acinetobacter baumannii in planktonic and biofilm phenotypes. Sci Rep 7(1):5911
Patil PA, Bhutkar BR, Dange YD, Kharat SV (2016) Screening of most effective nano metal between AgNP, CuNP and Ag-Cu NP’s synergistic by In vitro antibacterial comparison. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 7(353):2
Katva S, Das S, Moti HS, Jyoti A, Kaushik S (2017) Antibacterial synergy of silver nanoparticles with gentamicin and chloramphenicol against Enterococcus faecalis. Pharmacogn Mag 13(Suppl 4):S828
Hwang I, Hwang JH, Choi H, Kim K-J, Lee DG (2012) Synergistic effects between silver nanoparticles and antibiotics and the mechanisms involved. J Med Microbiol 61(12):1719–1726
Mohiti-Asli M, Pourdeyhimi B, Loboa EG (2014) Novel, silver-ion-releasing nanofibrous scaffolds exhibit excellent antibacterial efficacy without the use of silver nanoparticles. Acta Biomater 10(5):2096–2104
Yu L, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Liu J (2014) Enhanced antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles/halloysite nanotubes/graphene nanocomposites with sandwich-like structure. Sci Rep 4:4551
Ciobanu CS, Iconaru SL, Chifiriuc MC, Costescu A, Le Coustumer P, Predoi D (2013) Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of silver-doped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Biomed Res Int 2013:916218
Barralet J, Gbureck U, Habibovic P, Vorndran E, Gerard C, Doillon CJ (2009) Angiogenesis in calcium phosphate scaffolds by inorganic copper ion release. Tissue Eng Part A 15(7):1601–1609
Wu C, Zhou Y, Xu M et al (2013) Copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with multifunctional properties of angiogenesis capacity, osteostimulation and antibacterial activity. Biomaterials 34(2):422–433
Zhou J, Zhao L (2016) Multifunction Sr, Co and F co-doped microporous coating on titanium of antibacterial, angiogenic and osteogenic activities. Sci Rep 6:29069
Shie MY, Chang HC, Ding SJ (2012) Effects of altering the Si/Ca molar ratio of a calcium silicate cement on in vitro cell attachment. Int Endod J 45(4):337–345
Zhang J, Park Y-D, Bae W-J et al (2015) Effects of bioactive cements incorporating zinc-bioglass nanoparticles on odontogenic and angiogenic potential of human dental pulp cells. J Biomater Appl 29(7):954–964
Kargozar S, Baino F, Lotfibakhshaiesh N et al (2018) When size matters: biological response to strontium-and cobalt-substituted bioactive glass particles. Mater Today Proc 5(7):15768–15775
Li J, Zhai D, Lv F et al (2016) Preparation of copper-containing bioactive glass/eggshell membrane nanocomposites for improving angiogenesis, antibacterial activity and wound healing. Acta Biomater 36:254–266
Kim M, Kim C, Lim Y, Heo S (2006) Microrough titanium surface affects biologic response in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res Pt A 79(4):1023–1032
Tran N, Webster TJ (2011) Increased osteoblast functions in the presence of hydroxyapatite-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. Acta Biomater 7(3):1298–1306
Lee D, Heo DN, Kim H-J et al (2016) Inhibition of osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption by bisphosphonate-conjugated gold nanoparticles. Sci Rep 6:27336
Yi C, Liu D, Fong C-C, Zhang J, Yang M (2010) Gold nanoparticles promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through p38 MAPK pathway. ACS Nano 4(11):6439–6448
Lin K, Liu P, Wei L et al (2013) Strontium substituted hydroxyapatite porous microspheres: surfactant-free hydrothermal synthesis, enhanced biological response and sustained drug release. Chem Eng J 222:49–59
Yang F, Dong W, He F, Wang X, Zhao S, Yang G (2012) Osteoblast response to porous titanium surfaces coated with zinc-substituted hydroxyapatite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 113(3):313–318
Mo A, Liao J, Xu W, Xian S, Li Y, Bai S (2008) Preparation and antibacterial effect of silver–hydroxyapatite/titania nanocomposite thin film on titanium. Appl Surf Sci 255(2):435–438
Kargupta R, Bok S, Darr CM, Crist BD, Gangopadhyay K, Gangopadhyay S, Sengupta S (2014) Coatings and surface modifications imparting antimicrobial activity to orthopedic implants. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 6(5):475–495
Kilgus DJ, Howe DJ, Strang A (2002) Results of periprosthetic hip and knee infections caused by resistant bacteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:116–124
Page K, Wilson M, Parkin IP (2009) Antimicrobial surfaces and their potential in reducing the role of the inanimate environment in the incidence of hospitalacquired infections. J Mater Chem 19:3819–3831
Park KD, Kim YS, Han DK, Kim YH, Lee EHB, Suh H, Choi KS (1998) Bacterial adhesion on PEG mod- ified polyurethane surfaces. Biomaterials 19:851–859
Bridges AW, García AJ (2008) Anti-inflammatory polymeric coatings for implantable biomaterials and devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2:984–994
Gao G, Yu K, Kindrachuk J, Brooks DE, Hancock RE, Kizhakkedathu JN (2011) Antibacterial surfaces based on polymer brushes: investigation on the influence of brush properties on antimicrobial peptide immobilization and antimicrobial activity. Biomacromolecules 12(10):3715–3727
Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Noordin S, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP, Hancock Robert EW, Wang R (2012) Drug release and bone growth studies of antimicrobial peptide-loaded calcium phosphate coating on titanium. J Biomed Mater Res Pt B 2012(00B):000–000
Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Kindrachuk J, Duan K, Jenssen H, Hancock RE, Wang R (2010) Antimicrobial peptides on calcium phosphate-coated titanium for the prevention of implant-associated infections. Biomaterials 31(36):9519–9526
Bayramov DF, Neff JA (2017) Beyond conventional antibiotics—new directions for combination products to combat biofilm. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 112:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.07.010
Tan H, Ma R, Lin C, Liu Z, Tang T (2013) Quaternized chitosan as an antimicrobial agent: antimicrobial activity, mechanism of action and biomedical applications in orthopedics. Int J Mol Sci 14(1):1854–1869
Yoshinari M, Oda Y, Kato T, Okuda K (2001) Influence of surface modifications to titanium on antibacterial activity in vitro. Biomaterials 22:2043–2048
Tsuchiya H, Shirai T, Nishida H, Murakami H, Kabata T, Yamamoto N, Watanabe K, Nakase J (2012 Sep 1) Innovative antimicrobial coating of titanium implants with iodine. J Orthop Sci 17(5):595–604
Montanaro L, Speziale P, Campoccia D, Ravaioli S, Cangini I, Pietrocola G, Giannini S, Arciola CR (2011) Scenery of Staphylococcus implant infections in ortho- pedics. Future Microbiol 6:1329–1349
Colon G, Ward BC, Webster TJ (2006) Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. J Biomed Mater Res A 78:595–604
Ren G, Hu D, Cheng EW, Vargas-Reus MA, Reip P, Allaker RP (2009) Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications. Int J Antimicrob Agents 33(6):587–590
Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR (2006) The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials 27(11):2331–2339
Barrère F, Layrolle P, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K (2001) Biomimetic coatings on titanium: a crystal growth study of octacalcium phosphate. J Mater Sci Mater Med 12:529–534
Shadanbaz S, Dias GJ (2012) Calcium phosphate coatings on magnesium alloys for biomedical applications: a review. Acta Biomater 8:20–30
Blom E, Klein-Nulend J, Wolke J, Van Waas M, Driessens F, Burger E (2002) Transforming growth factor-𝛽1 incorporation in a calcium phosphate bone cement: material properties and release characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res 59:265–272
Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Turek T, Sherman H, Wozney JM (2004) Locally delivered rhBMP-2 enhances bone ingrowth and gap healing in a canine model. J Orthop Res 22:58–65
Bernhardt R, van den Dolder J, Bierbaum S, Beutner R, Scharnweber D, Jansen J, Beckmann F, Worch H (2005) Osteoconductive modifications of Ti-implants in a goat defect model: characterization of bone growth with SR muCT and histology. Biomaterials 26:3009–3019
Rammelt S, Illert T, Bierbaum S, Scharnweber D, Zwipp H, Schneiders W (2006) Coating of titanium implants with collagen, RGD peptide and chondroitin sulfate. Biomaterials 27:5561–5571
Van der Flier A, Sonnenberg A (2001) Function and interactions of integrins. Cell Tissue Res 305(3):285–298
Petrie TA, Raynor JE, Reyes CD, Burns KL, Collard DM, García AJ (2008) The effect of integrin- specific bioactive coatings on tissue healing and implant osseointegration. Biomaterials 29(19):2849–2857
Huebsch N, Arany PR, Mao AS, Shvartsman D, Ali OA, Bencherif SA et al (2010) Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 9(6):518
Uskoković V, Hoover C, Vukomanović M, Uskoković DP, Desai TA (2013) Osteogenic and antimicrobial nanoparticulate calcium phosphate and poly-(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) powders for the treatment of osteomyelitis. Mater Sci Eng C 33(6):3362–3373
Ducheyne P, Mauck RL, Smith DH (2012) Biomaterials in the repair of sports injuries. Nat Mater 11:652–654
Issa JP, Bentley M, Iyomasa VMM, Sebald W, De Albuquerque RF (2008) Sustained release carriers used to delivery bone morphogenetic proteins in the bone healing process. Anat Histol Embryol 2008(37):181–187
Hensleea AM, Specera PP, Yoon DM, Naira MB, Meretoja VV (2011) Biodegradable composite scaffolds incorporating an intramedullary rod and delivering bone morphogenetic protein-2 for stabilization in segmental long bone defects. Acta Biomater 7:3627–3637
Petrovic V, Zivkovic P, Petrovic D, Stefanovic V (2006) Craniofacial bone tissue engineering. Dent Clin N Am 50:175–190
Karnik S, Mills DK (2015) Nanoenhanced hydrogel system with sustained release capabilities. J Biomed Mat Pt A 103(7):2416–2426
Karnik S, Jammalamadaka UM, Tappa K, Mills DK (2016) Performance evaluation of nanoclay enriched antimicrobial hydrogels for biomedical applications. Heliyon 2:e00072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00072
Jammalamadaka U, Tappa K, Mills DK (2018) Calcium phosphate/clay nanotube bone cement with enhanced mechanical properties and sustained drug release. In: Zoveidavianpoor M (ed) Clay science and engineering. InTech, Zagreb, Croatia
Patel S, Jammalamadaka U, Sun L, Tappa K, Mills DK (2015) Sustained Release of Antibacterial Agents from Doped Halloysite Nanotubes. Bioengineering (Basel) 3(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering3010001
Wei W, Minullina R, Abdullayev E, Fakhrullin R, Mills D, Lvov Y (2014) Enhanced efficiency of antiseptics with sustained release from clay nanotubes. RSC Adv 4:488–494
Mills DK, Tappa K, Jammalamadaka UM, Mills PAS, Alexander JS, Weisman JA (2018) Chapter 8. Medical applications for 3D printing. In: Bar-Cohen Y (ed) Advances in manufacturing and processing of materials and structures. CRC, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Rotan, FL
El-Rashidy A, Roether J, Hrhaus L, Kneser U, Boccinni A (2017) Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: a review of in vivo studies in bone defect models. Acta Biomater 62:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030. Epub 2017 Aug 24
Sawkins M, Mistry Brown P, Shakesheff K, Bonassar J, Yang J (2015) Cell and protein compatible 3D bioprinting of mechanically strong constructs for bone repair. Biofabrication 7:035004
Zhao F, Xie W, Zhang W, Fu X, Gao W, Lei B, Chen X (2018) 3D Printing nanoscale bioactive glass scaffolds enhance osteoblast migration and extramembranous oosteogenesis through stimulating immunomodulation. Adv Healthc Mater 7(16):e1800361. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800361. Epub 2018 Jun 27
Murphy C, Kolan KCR, Long M, Li W, Leu MC, Semon JA, Day DE (2016) 3D printing of a polymer bioactive glass composite for bone repair. In: Solid Freedom Fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freedom Fabrication Symposium
Bergmann C, Lindner M, Zhang W, Koczur K, Kirsten A, Telle R, Fischer H (2010) 3D printing of bone substitute implants using calcium phosphate and bioactive glasses. J Eur Ceram Soc 30(12):2563–2567
Kolana K, Liuae Y, JakebBaldridge J, Murphy C, Semon J, Day D, Leu D (2017) Solvent based 3D printing of biopolymer/bioactive glass composite and hydrogel for tissue engineering applications. Proc CIRP 65:38–43
Zhang J, Chen Y, Jing Y, Wang J, Li C, Wang L (2018) Tissue engineering using 3D printed nano-bioactive glass loaded with NELL1 gene for repairing alveolar bone defects. Regener Biomater 5:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rby015
Ma H, Feng C, Chang J, Wu C (2018) 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: from bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy. Acta Biomater 79:3759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Aug 28
Inzana JA, Trombetta RP, Schwarz EM, Kates SL, Awad HA (2015) 3D printed bioceramics for dual antibiotic delivery to treat implant-associated bone infection. Eur Cell Mater 30:232–247. (Published 2015 Nov 4. 121)
Zuniga J (2018) 3D printed antibacterial prostheses. Appl Sci 8:1651
Liaw CY, Guvendiren M (2017) Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine. Biofabrication 9:024102
Cox SC, Thornby JA, Gibbons GJ, Williams MA, Mallick KK (2015) 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 47:237–247
Cheng H, Chabok R, Guan X, Chawla Y, Li A, Khademhosseini, A, Jang H (2018) Synergistic interplay between the two major bone minerals, hydroxyapatite and whitlockite nanoparticles, for osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, Acta Biomater. 69: 342–351.
Mok S-W, Nizak R, Fu S-C, Ho K-WK, Qin L, Saris DBF, Chan KM, Malda J (2016) From the printer: potential of three-dimensional printing for orthopaedic applications. J Orthop Transl 6:42–49
Wang X, Ao Q, Tian X, Fan J, Wei Y, Hou W, Tong H, Bai S (2016) 3D bioprinting technologies for hard tissue and organ engineering. Materials 9(10):802
Kim BS, Jang J, Chae S, Gao G, Kong J-S, Ahn M, Cho D-W (2016) Three dimensional bioprinting of cell-laden constructs with polycaprolactone protective layers for using various thermoplastic polymers. Biofabrication 8(3):035013
Mills DK, Tappa K, Jammalamadaka U, Weisman JA, Woerner RJ (2018) The use of 3D printing in the fabrication of nasal stents. Inventions 3:1. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions3010001
Horst DJ, Tebcherani SM, Kubaski ET, de Almeida Vieira R (2017) Bioactive potential of 3Dprinted oleo-gum-resin disks: B. papyrifera, C. myrrha, and S. benzoin loading nanooxides-TiO2, P25, Cu2O, and MoO3. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2017:6398167
Boyer CJ, Ballard DH, Weisman JA, Hurst S, McGee DJ, Mills DK, Woerner JE, Jammalamadaka U, Tappa K, Alexander JS (2018) Three dimensional printing antimicrobial and radiopaque constructs. 3D Print Add Manuf 5(1):29–35
Weisman J, Ballard D, Jammalamadaka U, Tappa K, Dagostino H, Mills DK, Woodard P (2018) 3D printed antibiotic and chemotherapeutic eluting catheters for potential use in interventional radiology: in vitro proof of concept study. Acad Radiol 26(2):270–274
Tappa K, Jammalamadaka U, Weisman JA, Ballard DH, Wolford DD, Pascual-Garrido C, Wolford LM, Woodard PK, Mills DK (2019) 3D printing custom bioactive and absorbable surgical screws, pins, and bone plates for localized drug delivery. J Funct Biomater 10:17. https://doi.org/10.3390//jfb10020017
Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16(12):396–406
Zhang Y, Zhai D, Xu M, Yao Q, Chang J, Wu C (2017) 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with antibacterial and osteogenic activity. Biofabrication 9(2):025037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa6ed6
Correia TR, Figueira DR, de Sá KD, Miguel SP, Fradique RG, Mendonça AG, Correia IJ (2016) 3D Printed scaffolds with bactericidal activity aimed for bone tissue regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 93(Pt B):1432–1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 3
Martin V, Ribeiroa I, Alves M, Concalves L, Claudio R et al (2019) Engineering a multifunctional 3D-printed PLA-collagen-minocyclinenanohydroxyapatite scaffold with combined antimicrobial and osteogenic effects for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 101:15–26
Aldrich A, Kuss M, Duan B, Kielian T (2019) 3D bioprinted scaffolds containing viable macrophages and antibiotics promote clearance of Staphylococcus aureus craniotomy-associated biofilm infection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(13):12298–12307. Epub 2019 Mar 21
Alfredo N, Dorronsoro A, Cortajarena AL, Rodríguez-Hernández J (2017) Antimicrobial 3D porous scaffolds prepared by additive manufacturing and breath figures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:37454–37462
Vargas-Alfredo N, Reinecke H, Gallardo A, del Campo A, RodríguezHernández J (2018) Fabrication of 3D printed objects with controlled surface chemistry and topography. Eur Polym J 98:21–27
Chen Q, Mangadlao JD, Wallat J, De Leon A, Pokorski JK, Advincula RC (2017) 3D printing biocompatible polyurethane/poly(lactic acid)/graphene oxide nanocomposites: anisotropic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:4015–4023
Tiimob BJ, Mwinyelle G, Abdela W, Samuel T, Jeelani S, Rangari VK (2017) Nanoengineered eggshell-silver tailored copolyester polymer blend film with antimicrobial properties. J Agric Food Chem 65:1967–1976
Totu EE, Nechifor AC, Nechifor G, Aboul-Enein HY, Cristache CM (2017) Poly(methyl methacrylate) with TiO2 nanoparticles inclusion for stereolitographic complete denture manufacturing—the future in dental care for elderly edentulous patients? J Dent 59:68–77
González-Henríquez CM, Sarabia-Vallejos MA, Rodríguez HJ (2019) Antimicrobial polymers for additive manufacturing. Int J Mol Sci 20(5):1210. Published 2019 Mar 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051210
Lim S, Kathuria H, Tan J, Kang L (2018) 3D printed drug delivery and testing systems—a passing fad or the future? Adv Drug Deliv Rev 132:139–168
Park S-H, Jung CS, Min B-H (2016) Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting for hard tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med 13(6):622–635
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the funding assistance provided by the Center for Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Tissue and Organ Regeneration (CDOCTOR) with the support of NIH NIDCR (U24DE026914).
Disclosures: Dr. David K Mills is a co-inventor on Methods and Devices for Three-Dimensional Printing or Additive Manufacturing of Bioactive Medical Devices. United States Patent Application No. 14/822,275 filed on August 10, 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elumalai, A., Lou, Y., Humayun, A., McFarland, A.J., Mills, D.K. (2020). 3D Printed Ceramic-Polymer Composites for Treating Bone Infection. In: Li, B., Moriarty, T., Webster, T., Xing, M. (eds) Racing for the Surface. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34475-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34475-7_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34474-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34475-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)