Skip to main content

Bureaucracy and Crisis of Development in Prismatic Cum Post-Colonial African States: An Ethical Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pan Africanism, Regional Integration and Development in Africa

Abstract

The continued and fragile existence of administrative states in Africa had been attributed to the government’s inability to deliver on the needs and demands of the constituents. African states, like other states that emerged through social contracts, had been bequeathed with enormous functions upon her citizens, and the actualization and delivery of these functions are paramount concerns of its bureaucracy, which has failed to reposition itself to provide the needful indicators of development in the administrative states of Africa. The history of Africa’s bureaucracy and bureaucratization regimes had never delivered on the good promises and dividends of democracy and national development; rather, it has retarded and brought about an intractable crisis in the development of Africa. However, it is against this backdrop that the purpose and thrust of the study is to adequately investigate and appreciate the nexus between bureaucracy and development in Africa, its role in continued existence of post-colonial economies. Methodologically, the study utilized qualitative method while generating its data and the framework of analysis was strictly anchored on Riggsian theory of prismatic society. The findings of the study had revealed that the inability of the various administrative states in post-colonial cum prismatic societies to accentuate development strides was holistically tied to variables of bureau pathetic behaviour. The study strongly recommends, among others, an orientation, training and capacity building for national growths and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abah, N. C. (2009). Development administration: A multi-disciplinary approach. Enugu: John Jacob’s Classic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo, A. (2001). Principles and practices of public administration. Ibadan: Spectrum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ademolekun, L. (1986). Politics and administration in Nigeria. Ibadan: Spectrum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adesopo, A. A., & Aluko, M. A. O. (2004). An appraisal of the two faces of bureaucracy in relation to the Nigeria society. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(6), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeyemo, D. O., & Osunyikanmi, R. O. (2009). Political influence on bureaucratic growth and social responsiveness: A case of Ondo state, Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 1(6), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akume, T. (2012). Focusing beyond the stigma of bureaucratic inefficiency to building a competence base bureaucracy in Nigeria. The imperative of training. Arabian Journal of Business and Management, 1(3), 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M. S. (1989). Anatomy of corruption: An approach to the political economy of underdevelopment. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48(4), 452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, W. O. (1980). Popular participation and rural development. Journal of Public Administration and Local Government, 4(2), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, D. E. (1963). Ghana in transition. New York: Antheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, R. K. (1979). Comparative administration. New Delhi: Associated Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, R. K., & Feror, N. (1986). Comparative administration. An ecological perspective. New Delhi: Associated Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bata, K. O. (1978). Bureaucracy, development and public management in India. New Delhi: Uppal Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Mayer, M. W. (1966). Bureaucracy in modern society. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. A., & Dunsire, N. T. (1971). The high civil service in Britain. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1974). The science of public administration: Three problems. New York: PAR Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. London: Little Brown.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doxey, G. V. (1961). The industrial colour bar in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, J. C. (1971). The bureaucracy and nation building. In W. R. Gable (Ed.), Political development and social change. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duru, E. J. C. (2001). The bureaucratic set up and operations in Britain, France,the United States and Nigeria: A comparative analysis. In E. J. C. Duru, M. O. Ikejiani-Clark, & D. O. Mbat (Eds.), Contemporary issues in public administration (pp. 30–40). Calabar/Benini: BAAJ International Company and The Atlantic Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, O. P., & Jain, R. B. (1985). Indian’s administrative state. New Delhi: Gitanjali Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eme, O., & Onwuka, C. (2010). Bureaucracy and challenges of good governance in Nigeria. Journal of Business and Organizational Development, 2(1), 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enahoro, N. I. (2016). The role of bureaucracy in good governance in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Legal Studies and Governance, 6(1), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespic, K., & Okruhlik, G. (1991). The political dimensions of corruption cleanups: A framework of analysis. Journal Comparative politics, 24(1), 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, T. W. (1988). Economic origin of apartheid. Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, 6(4), 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heady, F. (1991). Public administration, a comparative perspective (4th ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, F. (1992). Bureaucracies, government and politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, H. G., & Ray, G. C. (1995). Organization, theory and behaviour. New Delhi: Mac Graw Hill International Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, H. W. (1964). The economics of the colour Bar. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbra, J. G. (1976). Bureaucratic corruption in the third world: Causes and remedies. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 22(6), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (1967). The ecology of a squatter settlement. Architectural Review, 145, 233–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbaku, J. M. (1996). Bureaucratic corruption in Africa: The futility of clean ups. The CATO Journal, 6(1), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New Delhi: Amerind Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwachukwu, C. C. (1988). Management theory and practice. Onitsha: African FEP Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nweke, E. (2006). Public policy analysis: A strategic approach. Enugu: John Jacobs Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwizu, G. (1999). Eminent administrative thinkers from Taylor to present day. Enugu: John Jacob’s Classic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obikeze, S. O., & Obi, E. A. (2014). Public administration in Nigeria: A developmental approach. Onitsha: Book Point.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, C. A. (2014). Reform process and the advancement of sustainable development in Nigeria: Rethinking the role of the public bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration and Management, 3(6), 106–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odegard, P. H. (1954). Toward a responsible bureaucracy. American Academy of Political and Social Science, 292(1), 18–29. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunna, A. E. C. (2007). Public administration in Nigeria: Theory and practice. Owerri: Versatile Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okafor, E. E. (2005). Public bureaucracy and development in Nigeria: A critical overview of impediments to public service delivery. CODESRIA Bulletin, 3&4, 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaniyi, M. A. (2008). Public administration in South Africa: Changes and continuities. In E. A. Obi, O. S. A. Obikeze, L. C. Nwachuwu, & M. I. Abada (Eds.), Readings on comparative public administration: Theory and select country studies. Onitsha: Book Point Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, F. W. (1964). Public administration in developing countries: The theory of prismatic society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, M. P., & Sadana, B. L. (2010). Public administration in theory and practice. Allahabael: Kitab Mahal.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1963). Trade and development: Trends, needs and policies. New York: Department of Economics and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, A. T. (1961). Modern organization. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E., & Gwartney, J. D. (1988). Public choice and constitutional order. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Bureaucracy. In J. M. Shfritz & P. H. Whitbeck (Eds.), Classics of organization theory. Oak Park: Moore Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. E. (1989). South Africa’s war against capitalism. Pretoria: Foundation for Economic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1995). Bureaucrats in business: The economics and politics of government ownership. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from World Bank Policy Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abada, I.M., Okafor, N.I., Omeh, P.H. (2020). Bureaucracy and Crisis of Development in Prismatic Cum Post-Colonial African States: An Ethical Review. In: Oloruntoba, S.O. (eds) Pan Africanism, Regional Integration and Development in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34296-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics