Skip to main content

Do Top Social Apps Effect Voice Call? Evidence from Propensity Score Matching Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11910))

Abstract

The various mobile social APPs greatly enrich the way people communicate with each other. It has been argued that the use of mobile social APPs may influence user mobile phone call behaviour, as more and more people are used to using mobile social APPs for voice or video calls. Although mobile social APPs has penetrated into every aspect of our daily lives, so far there is no convincing research showing how the mobile social APPs influence the use of traditional mobile phone calls. Based on the potential outcomes model, we use the potential outcomes model to study the causal effects of the frequent use of mobile social APPs on mobile phone calls. The propensity score matching method is performed for bias adjustment. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis is conducted to test whether the results remained robust in the presence of hidden biases. The results suggest statistically significant positive effects of frequent use of Wechat on traditional mobile phone calls. But for QQ, we found that frequent use of QQ reduces mobile phone calls. The conclusion provides a new theoretical feature for business package recommendation, namely, the frequency of mobile social APPs. For WeChat users who use WeChat frequently, they are more inclined to provide business package containing high call duration, and for QQ users who use QQ frequently, they are more inclined to provide business package containing low call duration, which further enriches the method of business package recommendation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Althoff, T., Jindal, P., Leskovec, J.: Online actions with offline impact: how online social networks influence online and offline user behavior (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atzmueller, M.: Analyzing and grounding social interaction in online and offline networks. In: Calders, T., Esposito, F., Hüllermeier, E., Meo, R. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8726, pp. 485–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44845-8_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Austin, P.C.: An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav. Res. 46(3), 399–424 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, M., Kraut, R.E.: The relationship between facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength: Facebook and well-being. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 21(4), 265–281 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunbar, R.I.: Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? R. Soc. Open Sci. 3(1), 150292 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunbar, R.I.M., Arnaboldi, V., Conti, M., Passarella, A.: The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world. Soc. Netw. 43, 39–47 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gwenn Schurgin, O., Kathleen, C.P.: The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics 127(4), 800 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu, J.Y., Small, D.S., Rosenbaum, P.R.: Effect modification and design sensitivity in observational studies. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 108(501), 135–148 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Laranjo, L., et al.: The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22(1), 243–256 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meng, J.: Your health buddies matter: preferential selection and social influence on weight management in an online health social network. Health Commun. 31(12), 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh, H.J., Ozkaya, E., Larose, R.: How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30(1), 69–78 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reich, S.M., Subrahmanyam, K., Espinoza, G.: Friending, iming, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescents’ online and offline social networks. Dev. Psychol. 48(2), 356 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Design of Observational Studies (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Sabatini, F., Sarracino, F.: Online social networks and trust. Soc. Indicat. Res. 2, 1–32 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi, J., Salmon, C.T.: Identifying opinion leaders to promote organ donation on social media: network study. J. Med. Internet Res. 20(1), e7 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Song, H., et al.: Does facebook make you lonely?: A meta analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36(36), 446–452 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Utz, S.: The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Westreich, D., Lessler, J., Funk, M.J.: Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63(8), 826–833 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yadav, M., Joshi, Y., Rahman, Z.: Mobile social media: the new hybrid element of digital marketing communications. Proc. - Soc. Behav. Sci. 189, 335–343 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, S., Wang, B., Lu, Y.: Exploring the dual outcomes of mobile social networking service enjoyment: the roles of social self-efficacy and habit. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 486–496 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bingqing Liu or Yuanyuan Zeng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jiang, H. et al. (2019). Do Top Social Apps Effect Voice Call? Evidence from Propensity Score Matching Methods. In: Qiu, M. (eds) Smart Computing and Communication. SmartCom 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11910. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34139-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34139-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34138-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34139-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics