Skip to main content

An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Role of Intermediaries for Value-Added Services

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility—Volume 1

Part of the book series: Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation ((ASTI))

  • 1250 Accesses

Abstract

Consumers represent the largest market segment by total population and frequency of transactions across the global economy. However, many potential customers of products are unable to purchase goods due to their low income. The root causes of poverty are explored in terms of consumer products, the role of intermediaries, and the social responsibility of corporations. Consumer purchases often travel through intermediaries that extract profits from the value chain because of market structures and industry customs. This study reveals the hidden costs to consumers in the prices of common fungible consumer products, namely disposable batteries. This study examines the members of the value-added chain, and their contributions relative to the producers of the product. It will propose a model for transactional reallocation with respect to the marginal utility of intermediaries and the final price to end users. It is further proposed that the creation of a national market to reduce intermediary costs will more readily link final users with producers. Based on this analysis it was determined that opportunities exist to create greater profit margins for manufacturers who could then increase capital expenditures, reinvest in research and development while providing greater wages to unskilled labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afzal Hossain, M. (2017). Value added statement: A part of social responsibility reporting. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20170502.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar, S., & Mekki, Y. (2017). Environmental prosperity and sustainable development practices. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment., 21, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, K., & Singh, P. (2006). Supply chain management: A structured literature review and implications for future research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 703–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, K., Singh, P. J., & Koroglu R. (2006). Supply chain management: A structured literature review and implications for future research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26, 703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, M. (2017). Responsible supply chain management and stakeholder engagement for corporate reputation (pp. 79–95). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46849-5_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Catturi, G. (1994). La teoria dei flussi e degli stocks ed il “sistema dei valori” d’impresa (The theory of flows and stocks and the corporate “system of value”). Cedam, Padova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charkham, J. (2011). Keeping better company: Corporate governance ten years on. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243198.001.0001.

  • Coviello, N. E., & Brodie, R. J. (2001). Contemporary marketing practices of consumer and business-to-business firms: How different are they? The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 16, 382–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. (1979). Value added an appreciation for the accountants concerned with industry. Institute of Cost and Management Accountants, 1978, quoted in Morely, M. F. (1976). The value added statement in Britain. The Accounting Review, LIV(3), 620, from Cox, added value and corporate reporting. Management Accounting, 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M. (1991). Supply-chain management: The industrial organisation perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 21(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evraert, S., & Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1998). Usefulness of value added reporting: A review and synthesis of the literature. Managerial Finance, 24(11), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerstrøm, A., Stratton, J. P., & Foxall, G. R. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility activities on the consumer purchasing situation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(3/4), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1093053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fort, T., Pierce, J. R., & Schott, P. K. (2017). New perspectives on the decline of U.S. manufacturing employment. In Houseman, S. N. (2018). Understanding the decline of U.S. manufacturing employment. W.E. Upjohn Institute. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp18-287.

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Analysis, 38(01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay, S., & Wadhwa, W. (2004). Changing pattern of household consumption expenditure. Society for economic research & financial analysis. New Delhi: The Planning Commission, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, L. B. (2009). Buying power: A history of consumer activism in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, A., & Van Staden, C. (2014). The value added statement—An appropriate instrument for integrated reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1190–1216. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-04-2013-1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, A., Van Staden, C., & Landis, C. (2016). Value added as part of sustainability reporting: Reporting on distributional fairness or obfuscation? Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3338-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. A., Lipu, M. S. H., Hussain, A., & Mohamed, A. (2017). A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 834–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianniello, G. (2010). The voluntary disclosure of the value added statement in annual reports of Italian listed companies. Agricultural Economics Czech, 56(8), 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, J., Dangayach, G. S., Agarwal, G., & Banerjee, S. (2010). Supply chain management: Literature review and some issues. Journal of Studies on Manufacturing, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. R., & Kotler, P. (2011). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (2005). Measuring and interpreting world economic performance 1500–2001. Review of Income and Wealth, 51, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal N., & Goswami S. (2008). Value added statement (VAS)—A critical analysis. Great Lakes Herald, 2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markley, M. J., & Davis, L. (2007). Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37(9), 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondol, N., & Goswami, S. (2008). Value added statement (VAS)—A critical analysis-a case study of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited. Great Lakes Herald, 2(2), 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreley, M. F. (1979). Value added: The fashionable choice for annual reports and incentive scheme. The Accountant’s Magazine, June 1979, 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, M. F. (1978). The value added statement: A British innovation. The Chartered Accountant Magazine, 12(2), 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S., & Nielsen, E. H. (2008). System dynamics modelling for a balanced scorecard: Computing the influence of skills, customers, and work in process on the return on capital employed. Management Research News, 31(3), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. M. (2000). Value added reporting: In theory, practice and research (pp. 49–50). New Delhi: Deep and Deep Publications Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathi, R. A. (2017). Value added statement: A new dimension to accounting communication. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 1193–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichmann, T., & Lange, C. (1981). The value added statement as part of corporate social reporting. Management International Review, 21(4), 17–22 (Published by Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1992). Value added reporting: Lessons for the United States. Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1996). Performance results in value added reporting. Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1999). Productivity, profitability, and firm value. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 10(3), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-646X.00050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seretny, M., & Seretny, A. (2012). Sustainable marketing—A new era in the responsible marketing development. Foundations of Management, 4. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2013-0011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Future of Company Report. (1977). Green paper published by HMSO (p. 15) London: A Consultative Document of British Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, H. P., Schaubroeck, T., Swart, P., Six, L., Coonen, P., & Dewulf, J. (2018). Recycling portable alkaline/ZnC batteries for a circular economy: An assessment of natural resource consumption from a life cycle and criticality perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Staden, C. (1999). The usefulness of the value added statement: A review of the literature. Meditari Accountancy Research, 61998, 337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Staden, C. J. (2000). Revisiting the value added statement: To published or not to publish. In Proceedings of the 12th Asian Pacific Conference on International Accounting Issues (pp. 20–23), October 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Faccia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Darville, J., Faccia, A. (2020). An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Role of Intermediaries for Value-Added Services. In: Mateev, M., Nightingale, J. (eds) Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility—Volume 1. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32922-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics