Skip to main content

Qualitative Study of Legitimacy in Slovenian Prisons

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 139 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSCRIMINOL))

Abstract

The qualitative part of the study involved conducting structured interviews with prisoners, prison workers, and senior managers in all Slovenian prisons and the correctional home. The sample of prisoners (193) presents 16.5% of the average number of prisoners in 2015. Prisoners associated the legitimacy of the prison staff with legality and fairness of procedures applied against them. They also pointed to the differences in treatment received by some prisoners. However, they appreciated the humane approach and good relations which prison workers generally employed. The sample of prison workers (139) presents 18.2% of the average number of prison workers in 2015. Prison workers self-legitimacy was dependent on good relations with colleagues, supervisors’ fair and equal decisions, and good relations with prisoners. They also articulated negative aspects of their work, which often resulted in burnout. The sample of senior managers (12) presents 21.4% of the average number of managerial workers in 2015. Senior managers were aware of their dependence on prison workers‘ recognition of power. Consequently, they were striving to enforce a democratic style of leadership, based on the act of establishing good relations with their subordinates. Moreover, they highlighted the importance of quality of relations between themselves and prisoners for the day-to-day operation of prisons (specifics of Slovenian [small] prisons enable them more frequent and intensive relationships).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Distribution of surveyed prisoners in Slovenian prisons was as following: 14 respondents in Celje prison (25.5% of prisoners), 31 respondents in Dob prison (6.2% of prisoners), 6 respondents in Ig prison (28.6% of prisoners), 16 respondents in Ig prison for women (20.5% of female prisoners), 15 respondents in Koper prison (18.9% of prisoners), 15 respondents in Ljubljana prison (15.3% of prisoners), 27 respondents in Maribor prison (21.9% of prisoners), 16 respondents in Murska Sobota prison (84.2% of prisoners), 8 respondents in Nova Gorica (61.5% of prisoners), 8 respondents in Novo mesto prison (42.1% of prisoners), 7 respondents in Puščava prison (63.6% of prisoners), 11 respondents in Rogoza prison (40.7% of prisoners), 14 respondents in Slovenska vas prison (28.0% of prisoners), and 5 respondents in Radeče correctional home (18.5% of juveniles) (Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS] 2016).

  2. 2.

    The characteristics of the sample were compared to the characteristics of the prison population in 2015 provided in the Annual Report of the Slovenian prison administration (not all data were available in the Annual Report, which prevented an in-depth analysis). A comparison of the sample with the characteristics of the prison population show quite a similarity. Only minor differences are observed regarding age, gender and reoffending (URSIKS 2016).

  3. 3.

    Distribution of surveyed prison workers in Slovenian prisons was as following: 18 respondents in Celje prison (31.6% of prison workers), 20 respondents in Dob prison (13.6% of prison workers), 2 respondents in Ig prison (40.0% of prison workers), 11 respondents in Ig prison for women (30.6% of prison workers), 15 respondents in Koper prison (24.2% prison workers), 19 respondents in Ljubljana prison (19.0% prison workers), 12 respondents in Maribor prison (13.2% of prison workers), 9 respondents in Murska Sobota prison (39.1% of prison workers), 2 respondents in Nova Gorica (12.5% of prison workers), 9 respondents in Novo mesto prison (39.1% of prison workers), 2 respondents in Puščava prison (28.6% of prison workers), 4 respondents in Rogoza prison (57.1% of prison workers), 2 respondents in Slovenska vas prison (20.0% of prison workers), and 14 respondents in Radeče correctional home (56.0% of prison workers) (URSIKS 2016).

  4. 4.

    The characteristics of the sample were compared to the structure of prison staff in 2015 provided in the Annual Report of the Slovenian prison administration (not all data were available in the Annual Report, which prevented an in-depth analysis). A comparison shows a general similarity of the sample with minor differences regarding specific prison workers (URSIKS 2016).

  5. 5.

    Managerial staff employed at the Head Office of the Slovenian Prison Administration were not included in the sample. Moreover, senior managers from Maribor prison were not included in the sample.

Reference

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2016). Letno poročilo 2015. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rok Hacin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hacin, R., Meško, G. (2020). Qualitative Study of Legitimacy in Slovenian Prisons. In: The Dual Nature of Legitimacy in the Prison Environment. SpringerBriefs in Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32843-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32843-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32842-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32843-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics