Abstract
Geopolymers produced by using waste materials are more cost-effective and environmentally friendly. Commercial sodium silicate (sodium water glass) is currently being produced by direct fusion of pure silica sand and soda ash (Na2CO3) in oil, gas or electrically-fired furnaces at high temperatures (~1300 °C)—a production process that is energy intensive and which generates CO2. One method of minimizing these environmental issues is to use supplementary sources of silica, such as rice husk ash (RHA), to produce sodium silicate at lower temperatures. Therefore, this project aims to compare the effect of sodium silicate solution made of rice husk ash sieved at various particle sizes (un-sieved, <45 μm, <300 μm) using two techniques of (a) hydrothermal and (b) convection heating on fly ash-based geopolymer mortars. The geopolymers synthesized using ‘in-house’ sodium silicates were then compared with those made using commercial sodium silicate. Physicochemical properties of raw RHA and synthesized sodium silicates were characterized using the Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (EDXRF), X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX), and Inductively-Coupled Plasma (ICP). When using the convection heating method, finer particle sizes resulted in a higher conversion rate, while finer RHA resulted in the precipitation of crystalline silica during the hydrothermal process. Geopolymer mortars cured at a temperature of 70 °C were tested for compressive strength at 1, 7 and 28 days. At lower alkali dosages, the mortar strengths made out of both in-house and commercial sodium silicates had comparable strengths, while at higher alkali dosages the mortars prepared from commercial sodium silicates demonstrated significantly higher strengths.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abdul Rahim R, Rahmiati T, Azizli KA, Man Z, Nuruddin MF, Ismail L (2015) Comparison of using NaOH and KOH activated fly ash-based geopolymer on the mechanical properties. Paper presented at the Materials Science Forum
Arbi, K., Nedeljković, M., Zuo, Y., and Ye, G. (2016). A review on the durability of alkali-activated fly ash/slag systems: advances, issues, and perspectives. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 55(19), 5439–5453
Bana P, Greiner I (2016) Comparison of conventional and microwave heating for evaluation of microwave effects. Aust J Chem 69(8):865–871
Duxson P, Lukey GC, van Deventer JS (2007) Physical evolution of Na-geopolymer derived from metakaolin up to 1000 C. J Mater Sci 42(9):3044–3054
Feng Q, Chen K, Ma D, Lin H, Liu Z, Qin S, Luo Y (2018) Synthesis of high specific surface area silica aerogel from rice husk ash via ambient pressure drying. Colloids Surf, A 539:399–406
Foletto EL, Gratieri E, Oliveira LH, Jahn SL (2006) Conversion of rice hull ash into soluble sodium silicate. Mater Res 9(3):335–338
Ibrahim DM, El-Hemaly SA, Abdel-Kerim FM (1980) Study of rice-husk ash silica by infrared spectroscopy. Thermochim Acta 37(3):307–314
Ismail I, Bernal SA, Provis JL, San Nicolas R, Brice DG, Kilcullen AR, Van Deventer JS (2013) Influence of fly ash on the water and chloride permeability of alkali-activated slag mortars and concretes. Constr Build Mater 48:1187–1201
Juenger MCG, Winnefeld F, Provis JL, Ideker JH (2011) Advances in alternative cementitious binders
Kalapathy U, Proctor A, Shultz J (2000) Production and properties of flexible sodium silicate films from rice hull ash silica. Biores Technol 72(2):99–106
Kalapathy U, Proctor A, Shultz J (2000) A simple method for production of pure silica from rice hull ash. Bioresour Technol
Kamseu E, à Moungam LB, Cannio M, Billong N, Chaysuwan D, Melo UC, Leonelli C (2017) Substitution of sodium silicate with rice husk ash-NaOH solution in metakaolin based geopolymer cement concerning reduction in global warming. J Clean Prod 142:3050–3060
Kongmanklang C, Rangsriwatananon K (2015) Hydrothermal synthesis of high crystalline silicalite from rice husk ash. J Spectrosc
Lisovskyy I, Litovchenko V, Mazunov D, Kaschieva S, Koprinarova J, Dmitriev S (2005) Infrared spectroscopy study of Si-SiO2 structures irradiated with high-energy electrons. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 7(1):325–328
Owoeye S (2017) Effects of extraction temperature and time on the physical properties of soluble sodium silicate from rice husk ash. Sci J Chem
Rahier H, Simons W, Van Mele B, Biesemans M (1997) Low-temperature synthesized aluminosilicate glasses: part III influence of the composition of the silicate solution on production, structure and properties. J Mater Sci 32(9):2237–2247
Roschat W, Siritanon T, Yoosuk B, Promarak V (2016) Rice husk-derived sodium silicate as a highly efficient and low-cost basic heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production. Energy Convers Manag 119:453–462
Rungrodnimitchai S, Phokhanusai W, Sungkhaho N (2017) Preparation of silica gel from rice husk ash using microwave heating. J Metals, Mater Min 19(2)
Sharma NK, Williams WS, Zangvil A (1984) Formation and structure of silicon carbide whiskers from rice hulls. J Am Ceram Soc
Soutsos M, Boyle AP, Vinai R, Hadjierakleous A, Barnett SJ (2016) Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 110:355–368
Turner LK, Collins FG (2013) Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater
Xingcai W (1996) Studies on the hydrothermal conditions of the extraction of high-purity silica from rice husks. Bull Chin Ceram Soc, vol 4
Xu H (2000) The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals. Int J Min Process 59:247–266
Acknowledgements
This research is supported through the Newton Ungku-Omar Coordination Fund, jointly funded by Innovate UK and the Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology under the project title of “Low Carbon Footprint Precast Concrete (LowCoPreCon)”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsen, T.J., Kong, D., Zeimaran, E., Soutsos, M. (2020). Rice Husk Ash Derived Sodium Silicate Using Hydrothermal and Convection Heating Methods. In: Mohamed Nazri, F. (eds) Proceedings of AICCE'19. AICCE 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32816-0_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32816-0_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32815-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32816-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)