Skip to main content

Supply Chain Framework in Enhancing Construction Waste Management: A Case Study in Klang Valley

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of AICCE'19 (AICCE 2019)

Abstract

Construction Waste Management is part of a growing movement towards a sustainable world. The Eleventh Malaysia Plan had played a significant role in the demands of executing major residential housing project developments where it has been observed that construction wastes was one of the priorities among waste streams. The lack in the highlighting of the proper flow of the construction waste process has called for a need to contextualize, explore and document its practice in the construction industry to identify the current existing process of construction waste management, the barriers and the major types and composition of construction waste generated. The aim of this research is to develop the supply chain framework. This aim was achieved through a preliminary study and a case study method which was conducted in the Klang Valley using the qualitative and quantitative methods. First, a semi-structured interview was conducted among 20 contractors (G7) to identify the current existing process for construction waste management. The second method distributed the questionnaires and 60 responses from contractors (G7), clients and consultants were received on the barriers in the construction waste management process. The Third method conducted a survey on the heaps of waste through observation, estimated to identify the main types of construction waste produced. The main conclusions drawn from the findings gathered have produced that the supply chain framework consists of five main stages or process: waste generation, waste collection, waste segregation, waste reusing and recycling; and waste disposal which is directly used in managing the major construction waste produced including wood, metal, steel, bricks, cement and packaging. Each of these processes consists of comprehensive action taken and specific barriers as strategic items in enhancing the managing process of construction waste. With that, the establishment of this supply chain framework could enhance the current existing process in managing construction waste whereby indirectly reducing the amount of construction waste from being directly disposed in landfills through reusing and the recycling process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andrew RTD, Richard TB (2004) Towards improved construction waste minimisation: a need for improved supply chain integration? Emerald Res Reg 22(1):20–29

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beamon BM (1999) Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Inf Manage 12(4):332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Begum RA, Pereira JJ (2008) Environmental problems in Malaysia: a view of contractors’ perception. J Appl Sources 8(22):4230–4233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Begum RA, Siwar C et al (2006) A benefit cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: the case of Malaysia, Resouces. Conserv Recycl 48:86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Begum RA, Siwar C, Pereira JJ, Jaafar AH (2007) Implementation of waste management and minimization in the construction industry of Malaysia. Resour Conserv Recycl 321–328:53

    Google Scholar 

  6. Begum RA, Siwar C, Pereira JJ, Hamid JA (2009) Contractors’ willingness to pay for improving construction waste management in Malaysia. Malays Constr Res J 4(1)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blengini GA (2009) Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: a case study in turin, Italy. Build Environ 44:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheen KS, Chin-Yieh L, Yeow TS, Ashola A, Yahya NHN, Han WS, Yusof MN (2018) A study of construction waste practices in Selangor, planning Malaysia. J Malays Inst Planners 6(2):217–224

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen MC, Ruijs A, Wessler J (2005) Solid waste management on small islands: the case of green island, Taiwan. Resour Conserv Recycl 45:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coelho AD, Brito J (2008) Construction and demolition waste management in Portugal. In House Publishing, Rotterdam, Nertherlands

    Google Scholar 

  11. Couto JP, Couto AM (2007) Construction sites environment management: establishing measures to mitigate the noise and waste impact

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deng X, Liu G et al (2008) A study of construction and demolition waste management in Hong Kong. In: 4th international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2008 WiCOM’08, 12–14th Oct 2008, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  13. DSM (2008) Massachusetts construction and demolition debris industry study-final report environment services

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ekanayake L, Ofori G (2000) Construction material waste source evaluation. Department of Building, National University of Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  15. EPU (2010) Ninth Malaysia Plan, RMK9, Prime Minister. Putrajaya, The Economic Planning Unit (Online). Available from: http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/SpecialCoverage/RMK9/english/Chapter21.pdf

  16. Faniran OO, Caban G (1998) Minimizing waste on construction projects sites. J Eng Constr Architec Manage 5(2):182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fatta D, Papadopoulos A et al (2003) Generation and management of construction and demolition waste in greece: an existing challenge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fellows R, Liu A (2008) Research methods for construction. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gavillan RM, Bernold LE (1994) Source evaluation of solid waste in building construction. J Constr Eng Manage 120(3)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Golder Associates (1999) Waste profile study of victorian landfills south bank, Victoria, environment protection authority. Waste Manage Policy Unit

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huong TH, Larsen I (2007) Managing construction waste—the Sarawak experience, Malaysia. Institute of environment and development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jantan MH, Pereira JJ, Midon MS, Zain MZ (2004) Development of wood based products from construction waste. In: Proceedings of the construction industry research achievement seminar (CIRAS)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jones S (2007) Highlights of waste control laws and regulations in China, China environment forum’s partnership with Western Kentucky University on the USAID—supported China Environmental Health Protect Fact Sheet. [Online] Available from www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/wastelaw.pdf Accessed 5 January 2012.

  24. Jones P, Rubina R (2011) Case study: construction waste minimisation in housing (Online). Available from: www.cardiff.ac.uk/archi/programmes/cost8/case/waste/constructionwaste.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2011

  25. Kang XP, Wang JY, Tam VWY (2006) On site sorting of construction waste in Mainland China—a survey made in China. In: The CRIOCM international symposium. Advancement of construction management and real estate

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kartam N, Al-Mutairi N, Al-Ghusain I, Al-Humoud J (2004) Environmental management of construction and demolition waste in Kuwait. Waste Manag 24:1049–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kofoworola OF, Gheewala SH (2009) Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand. Waste Manage 29:731–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar R (2005) Research methodology-a step by step guide for beginners, 1st edn. SAGE Publication Inc

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar S, Malegeant P (2006) Strategic alliance in a closed-loop supply chain, a case of manufacturer and eco-non-profit organization. Technovation 26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Laquarta J (2003) Waste management at the construction site (Online). Available from: http://www.google.com.my/#hl=en&source=hp&q=waste+management+at+the+constrtion+site+laquatra&oq=WASTE+MANAGEMENT+AT+THE+&aq=0v&aqi=gv3gj7&aql=ufined&gs_sm=c&gs_upl=2128l9167l0l24l22l0l10l10l0l160l1446l4.8l12&fp=2f3aa98b3cbfb686&biw=1280&bih=675

  31. Lau HH, Whyte A, Lau PL (2008) Composition and characteristics of construction waste generated by residential housing project. Int. J. Environment. Res. 2(3):261–268

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lawson NA, Douglas L (2001) Recycling construction and demolition waste-A UK perspective. Environ Manag Health 12(2):147–157

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mahayuddin SA, Pereira JJ, Badaruzzaman WHW, Mokhtar MB (2008) Construction waste management in a developing country: case study of Ipoh, Malaysia. WIT Trans Ecol Environ, 109

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mahayuddin SA, Joy JP, Badaruzzaman WHW, Mokhtar MB (2010) Construction waste index for waste control in residential housing project. In: Proceeding SB10 Wellington-Innovation and tranformation. Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  35. Manaf LA, Abu MAA, Zukki NIM (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: practices and Challenges. Waste Manage 29:2902–2906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ministry of Housing and Local Government (MHLG) (2005) National strategic plan for solid waste management. Available from: http://www.kpkt.gov.my/kpkt/

  37. Nittvattananon V, Borongan G (2007) Construction and demolition waste management: current practices in Asia. In: Proceedings of the international conference on sustainable solid waste management, Chennai, India, 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  38. Noor et al (2017) Quantification of construction waste generated in residential housing projects via heap survey sampling with the method of visual estimation: a case study in Klang and Pulau Pinang. J Eng Appl Sci 12(4):792–796. ISSN 1816-949X. (Medwell Journal)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Noor et al (2018) Major challenges to improve the performance of construction waste management process: a case study in Klang Valley. In: AIP conference proceedings vol 2020, pp 020054. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062680

  40. Pereira JJ, Chamsuri S, Jantan MD, Midon MS (2002) Construction waste management-investigating opportunities for waste minimisation and recycling. In: Proceedings of the construction industry research achievement seminar 2002 (CIRAS 2002). Dewan Cemerlang 1, Mines International Exhibition Centre, Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  41. Poon CS, Ann TW, Ng LH (2001) On-site Sorting of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong. Resour Conserv Recycl 32:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Poon CS, Ann TW, Ng LH (2004) Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong. Constr Manage Econ 22:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Poon CS, Yu ATW, Wong SW, Cheung E (2004) Management of construction waste in public housing projects in Hong Kong. Constr Manage Econ 22:675–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rahim MHIA, Kasim N, Mohamed I, Zainal R, Sarpin N, Saikah M (2017) Construction waste generation in Malaysia construction industry: illegal dumping activities, IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 271, p 012040 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/271/1/012040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schubeler P (1996) Conceptual framework for municipal solid waste management in low-income countries. UNDP/UNCHS/WORLD BANK-UMP SKAT (Swiss Centre for Development Cooperation in Technology and Management)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Seow TW, Mohamad AW (2007) Pengurusan Sisa Pembinaan di Tapak Bina..(online). Available from: http://sssums.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/pengurusan-sisa-pembinaan-di-tapak-bina.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2012

  47. Tang HH, Larsen IB (2004). Managing construction waste—a Sarawak experience. DANIDA/Sarawak Government UEMS Project, Natural Resources and Environmental Board (NREB), Sarawak and Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA)

    Google Scholar 

  48. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Characterization of building-related construction and demolition debris in the United States. United State, the U.S. environmental protection agency municipal and industrial solid waste division office of solid waste

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang JY, Kang XP, Tam VY (2008) An investigation of construction waste: an empirical study in Shenzen. J Eng Des Technol 6(3):227–236

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wang H, Yuan H, Ye G (2010) Construction and demolition waste management in Hong Kong: practices and challenges. In: 4th international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering (ICBBE), pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wilson OD, Skitmore M, Seydel L (1998) Waste management in the construction industry. In: Proceedings symposium a: materials and technologies for sustainable construction

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yang J, Mitchell D (2010) Approaches to waste materials management in construction projects. The construction, building and real estate research conference of the royal institution of chartered surveyors, at Dauphine University

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yuan P, Shen L, Wang J (2011) Major obstacles to improving the performance of waste management in China’s construction industry. Facilities 29(5/6):224–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao W, Rotter S (2008) The current situation of construction and demolition waste management in china. In: 2nd international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering, ICBBE 2008, pp 4747–4750

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia and Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia for funding of research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raja Nor Husna Raja Mohd Noor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Noor, R.N.H.R.M., Endut, I.R., Redzuan, A.R.M., Dahalan, N.H., Yunus, J.N., Tammy, N.J. (2020). Supply Chain Framework in Enhancing Construction Waste Management: A Case Study in Klang Valley. In: Mohamed Nazri, F. (eds) Proceedings of AICCE'19. AICCE 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32816-0_105

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32816-0_105

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32815-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32816-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics