Skip to main content

Global Organizational Model and Institutional Change of Ombudsman

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 234 Accesses

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

Abstract

This chapter concludes my observations that point to an emerging global organizational model or set of ideas that now frame the activities of the ombudsman. Though not always coherent, these ideational influences are accommodated by an institutional context and carried by individual actors, whose role is often decisive in the development of the institution. The ombudsman is a peculiar institution of public accountability—both an institution and individual. Operating at the juncture of law and politics, the institution not only discerns changes in the general political climate but also engages in a constant renegotiation of its intra-institutional position, also involving conflicts over its institutional mandate. This is also where the global institutional models become indispensable, legitimizing the changes in the activities of these organizations, granting institutional ideas and giving sense of orientation. But such organizational blueprints can also treat actors differently, working as mechanisms of inclusions and exclusions. To a certain extent, the models come to hide the institutional tensions and political conflicts involved. This underlines the interplay of institutional context, actors and ideas in understanding the dynamics of transnational governance and the changing profile of the ombudsman as an institution of public accountability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Bovens the account holder or the “accountee” can be a person or an agency, but it can also be seen as an “accountability forum” such as the general public (Bovens 2005). Bovens defines the social process of “account giving” in terms of three elements: the accountor’s obligation to give account to the accountability forum, the forum’s ability to interrogate the accountor and the forum’s ability to pass a judgement and impose sanctions (Bovens 2005).

References

  • Abraham, Ann. 2008. The Ombudsman as Part of the UK Constitution: A Contested Role? Parliamentary Affairs 61 (1): 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, Pertti, Marjaana Rautalin, and Jukka Syväterä. 2015. Organisations as Epistemic Capital: The Case of Independent Children’s Rights Institutions. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 29 (1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-015-9205-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakewell, R.D. 1986. The Ombudsman and Politics. Australian Journal of Public Administration 45 (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1986.tb01038.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudot, Pierre-Yves, and Anne Revillard. 2011. Le Médiateur de La République Au Prisme de La Démocratie Administrative. Revue Française d’administration Publique 137–138: 193–207. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.137.0193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Colin J. 1997. Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance 10 (3): 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.401997040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark. 2005. Public Accountability. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, ed. Ewan Ferlie, Laurence Lynn, and Christopher Pollitt. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, Sonia. 2014. Chains of Justice: The Global Rise of State Institutions for Human Rights, Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä, Tero. 2007. Governance and Accountability—A Shift in Conceptualisation. Public Administration Quarterly 31 (1): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä, Tero, and Niilo Kauppi. 2017. From Human Rights to Good Governance and Back: The Institutionalization of the European Ombudsman. In The Challenges of European Governance in the Age of Economic Stagnation, Immigration, and Refugees, ed. Chip Carey, 239–251. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammeltoft-Hansen, Hans. 2008. The Ombudsman as a Marker of the Limits of Politics. Unpublished conference paper presented in Tallinn, 7 March 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric. 1987. Introduction: Inventing Traditions. In The Invention of Tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Jeong-Woo, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 2009. National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966–2004. Social Forces 87 (3): 1321–1353. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnette, Paul. 2003. Between Parliamentary Control and the Rule of Law: The Political Role of the Ombudsman in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 10 (5): 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000124032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen, eds. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 1997. World Society and the Nation-State. The American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, Richard. 2000. ‘Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Public Administration 78 (3): 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, Glen. 2011. Parties, People, and Parliament: Britain’s ‘Ombudsman’ and the Politics of the 1960s. Journal of British Studies 50 (3): 690–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, Kari. 2003. Four Times of Politics: Policy, Polity, Politicking, and Politicization. Alternatives 28 (2): 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pegram, Thomas. 2008. Accountability in Hostile Times: The Case of the Peruvian Human Rights Ombudsman 1996–2001. Journal of Latin American Studies 40 (1): 51–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X0700363X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2000. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change. Governance 13 (4): 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reif, Linda C. 2004. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas. 2010. A Community of Europeans?: Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin. 1969. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory 8 (1): 3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tero Erkkilä .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erkkilä, T. (2020). Global Organizational Model and Institutional Change of Ombudsman. In: Ombudsman as a Global Institution. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32675-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics