Skip to main content

European Ombudsman as a Supranational Institution of Accountability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Ombudsman as a Global Institution

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses the institutional development of the European Ombudsman and the attendant role of transnational norms, policy discourses and actors. The European Ombudsman is interesting as a rare instance of a supranational ombudsman institution. But it is also worth examining because it has profiled itself as an institution of good governance. This chapter highlights the ability of actors to translate transnational norms and policy discourses to promote their own agenda and explores how promoting good governance and transparency has become a strategy to advance the institution in the inter-institutional setting of the EU. The global drive for “good governance” and “transparency” coincided with the establishment of the European Ombudsman in 1995 and resonated with the crises of EU governance. While the discourse on fundamental rights is relevant to the European Ombudsman, its profile and mandate to some extent exclude it from the conceptual field of human rights. While the European Ombudsman has been effective in promoting good governance in the EU, it has had less impact through the complaints of EU citizens that mostly fall outside its competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The proposed amendments concerned the Ombudsman’s relation vis-à-vis the judiciary, references to secrecy and discretion in handling documents, conflict of interest cases, strategic inquiries, Ombudsman’s presence in parliamentary hearings, Ombudsman’s additional duties (whistleblowing, harassment cases), Ombudsman’s qualifications and the seat of the European Ombudsman.

  2. 2.

    Compared to the Finnish case, the role of individuals was emphasized much more in the EU context. In Finland, the talk was about the institution and the people acting as the Ombudsman were part of a longer continuum to which they had undoubtedly contributed to but were still regarded less influential than in the EU context, where the respondents at times reduced the whole institution to office holders.

  3. 3.

    In the interviews, it was stated that initially the institution made a mark through infringement cases, own initiatives and work involving procedural rights. This also led to their acceptance by the EU Commission.

  4. 4.

    Problems with the EU? Who can help you? https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/publication/en/11134

  5. 5.

    In 2018, there was an increase in complaints that were within the mandate of the European Ombudsman (about 40%), which the Ombudsman herself interpreted as a result of higher awareness of her office’s work (European Ombudsman 2019). The total number of complaints is almost the same as in 2017.

  6. 6.

    The presentation of statistics on staff matters in the European Ombudsman’s annual reports has changed over the years, mostly being separated in two categories. They appear as a single group in the 2016 report, Good Management of EU personnel issues is the second biggest case group (28.2%) after Transparency (29.6%).

  7. 7.

    In the interviews, also the European Ombudsman’s positioning in the EU’s legal system was emphasized when discussing its establishment. Arguably, it is difficult to bring a case to European Court of Justice due to its locus standi restrictions, making the European Ombudsman a focal point for certain kind of conflicts, often in trade, environmental and consumer law.

  8. 8.

    Similar to the European Ombudsman, the right to petition to the European Parliament is acknowledged in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (European Union 2012a, Article 44).

  9. 9.

    Cases can remain open for years and may be repeatedly discussed by the Committee. Also the decision to declare a case closed is not always clearly defined and is often a matter of interpretation by the Committee.

  10. 10.

    Inadmissibility often results from the applicant’s failure to follow the full legal path in national judicial system before lodging an application with the Court, the application being out of scope of the ECHR, or been filed too late.

  11. 11.

    The individual complaint mechanism to Committee on Migrant Workers (CMW) is not yet entered into force. Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) does not provide a complaint mechanism, but it may visit sites where persons are held captive. It also assists states on establishing National Preventive Mechanisms (NPM), required by the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT ), advising also the work of established NPMs.

  12. 12.

    In July 2018, there were 12 cases from Finland pending before UN committees (Helsingin Sanomat 2018).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tero Erkkilä .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erkkilä, T. (2020). European Ombudsman as a Supranational Institution of Accountability. In: Ombudsman as a Global Institution. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32675-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics