Abstract
The following chapter describes a concept model for proactive decision support system based on (real-time) predictive analytics and designed for maintenance of cyber-physical systems (CPSs) in order to optimize its downtime. This concept later is referred to as proactive and predictive maintenance decision support systems or P2M for short. The concept is based on (i) the axioms of predictive decisions making, (ii) the proactive computing principles and (iii) models and methods for intelligent data processing. The aforementioned concept extends an idea of data-driven intelligent systems by using two approaches. The first approach implements predictive analytics, i.e. detection of a pre-failure event (called a proactive event) over a certain time period. This approach is based on the sequence of the following operational processes: to detect–to predict–to decide–to act. The second approach helps to automate maintenance decisions, which allows to exclude operational roles and move to supervisory level positions in the operational management structure. The concept includes the following primary components: ontology, a data warehouse (data lake), data factory as a set of data processing methods, flexible pipelines for data handling and processing and business processes with predictive decision logic for cyber-physical systems maintenance. This concept model is considered as the platform for the design of cyber-physical asset performance management systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gorjian, N., Ma, L., Mittinty, M., Yarlagadda, P., Sun, Y.: A review on degradation models in reliability analysis. In: Kiritsis, D., Emmanouilidis, C., Koronios, A., Mathew, J. (eds.) Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management, pp. 369–384. Springer, London (2010)
Tennenhouse, D.: Proactive computing. Commun. ACM 43(5), 43–50 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/332833.332837
Industry 4.0 challenges and solutions for digital transformation and use of exponential technologies. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ch/Documents/manufacturing/ch-en-manufacturing-industry-4-0-24102014.pdf
Industry 4.0—opportunities and challenges of Industrial Internet. PricewaterhouseCoopers. https://www.pwc.nl/en/assets/documents/pwc-industrie-4-0.pdf
Tupa, J., Jan, S., Steiner, F.: Aspects of risk management implementation for industry 4.0, Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 11, pp. 1223–1230 (2017). ISSN 2351-9789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.248
NASA Ames Prognostic Center. https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/
Canizo, M., Onieva, E., Conde, A., Charramendieta, S., Trujillo, S.: Real-Time Predictive Maintenance for Wind Turbines Using Big Data Frameworks, pp. 1–8 (n.d.)
Ciomek, K., Ferretti, V., Ferretti, V.: Predictive analytics and disused railways requalification: insights from a post factum analysis perspective. Decis. Support Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.10.010
Cleary, D., Tax, R.I.: Predictive analytics in the public sector: using data mining to assist better target selection for audit. Electron. J. E-Gov.Ment 9(2), 132–140 (2011)
Yu, L.: Wind turbine data analytics for drive-train failure early detection and diagnostics. Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Ceramics; Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Wind Turbine Technology, pp. 721–728 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2011-45101
Schmidhuber, J.: Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview. https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7828
Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02754
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning. MIT Press (2016). http://www.deeplearningbook.org
Deng, L., Yu D.: Deep Learning: Methods and Applications. Microsoft Research. One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Dehghani, M., et al.: Universal Transformers. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.03819.pdf
Bai, S., Kolter, J.Z., Koltun, V.: An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.01271
Elbayad, M., Besacier, L., Verbeek, J.: Pervasive Attention: 2D Convolutional Neural Networks for Sequence-to-Sequence Prediction. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.03867
Pons, M.B.: The expected value of perfect information in unrepeatable decision-making. Decis. Support Syst. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.03.003
Arnott, D., Pervan, G.: Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline. Decis. Support Syst. 44(3), 657–672 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.003
Arnott, D., Pervan, G.: A critical analysis of decision support systems research revisited: the rise of design science. J. Inf. Technol. 29(4), 269–293 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.16
VanSyckel, S., Becker, C.: A survey of pervasive computing. UBICOMP Comput. Sci. 3(6), 1–7 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641672
ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288: Systems and Software Engineering—System Life Cycle Processes (2015). https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/63711.html
Nural, M.V., Cotterell, M.E., Peng, H., Xie, R., Ma, P., Miller, J.A.: Automated predictive big data analytics using ontology based semantics. Int. J. Big Data 2(2), 43–56 (2015). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/chapters/PMC5898823/
Jarvenpaa, E., Siltala, N., Hylli, O., Minna, L.: The development of an ontology for describing the capabilities of manufacturing resources. J. Intell. Manuf. 30, 959 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1427-6
Anufriev, D., Petrova, I., Kravets, A., Vasiliev, S.: Big data-driven control technology for the heterarchic system (building cluster case-study). Stud. Syst. Decis. Control. 181, 205–222 (2019)
Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R.: Ontology engineering methodology. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, 2nd edn., pp. 135–152. Springer, New York (2009). ISBN 978-3-540-70999-2
Kizim A., Matokhina, A., Nesterov, B.: Development of ontological knowledge representation model of industrial equipment. Creativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science, CIT&DS 2015, Volgograd, Russia, 15–17 Sep 2015. Proceedings, vol. 535, pp. 354. Springer (2015)
Tran, V.P., Shcherbakov, M., Nguyen, T.A.: Yet another method for heterogeneous data fusion and preprocessing in proactive decision support systems: distributed architecture approach. In: Vishnevskiy V., Samouylov K., Kozyrev D. (eds.) Distributed Computer and Communication Networks. DCCN 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 700. Springer, Cham (2017)
Kizim, A.V., et al.: Predictive modeling as a basis for monitoring, diagnosis, forecasting and upgrading of a technical system. In: 2017 IEEE 11th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT). IEEE, pp. 1–5 (2017)
Golubev, A., Shcherbakov, M., Shcherbakova, N., Kamaev, V.: Automatic multi-steps forecasting method for multi seasonal time series based on symbolic aggregate approximation and grid search approaches. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 8(3S), 2529–2541 (2016)
Shcherbakov, M.V., Brebels A., Shcherbakova, N.L., Kamaev, V.A., Gerget, O.M., Devyatuch, D.V.: Outlier detection and classification in sensor data streams for proactive decision support systems. In: International Conference on Information Technologies in Business and Industry 2016, Tomsk, Rus. Federation, 21–23 Sep 2016. Chapter № 012143, J. Phys Conf. Ser. 803(1), 8 (2017)
Shcherbakov, M.V., Groumpos, P.P., Kravets A.G.: A method and IR4I index indicating the readiness of business processes for data science solutions. Creativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science. Second Conference, CIT&DS 2017 (Volgograd, Russia, September 12–14, 2017). In: Kravets, A., Shcherbakov, M., Kultsova, M., Peter Groumpos; Volgograd State Technical University et al. (eds.) Proceedings. Springer International Publishing AG, Germany, 2017, vol. 754, pp. 21–34. (Ser. Communications in Computer and Information Science)
Kravets, A., Kozunova, S.: The risk management model of design department’s PDM information system. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 754, 490–500 (2017)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Russian Fund of Basic Research (grant No. 19-47-340010). Special thanks go to George Sergeev for fruitful discussion and essential remarks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shcherbakov, M.V., Glotov, A.V., Cheremisinov, S.V. (2020). Proactive and Predictive Maintenance of Cyber-Physical Systems. In: Kravets, A., Bolshakov, A., Shcherbakov, M. (eds) Cyber-Physical Systems: Advances in Design & Modelling. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32579-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32579-4_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32578-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32579-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)