Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geopolitics and Gas-Transit Security Through Pipelines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulations in the Energy Industry

Abstract

Hydrocarbons are valuable only if they can be transited from where they are produced to where they are consumed. Despite the enduring importance of transit to the global energy system, the topic did not begin to be extensively analyzed until contentious relations between Russia and Ukraine disrupted natural gas flows to Europe in 2006. This chapter examines the geopolitics and security of transiting gas through pipelines by exploring the connection between geography, global energy strategies, and natural gas markets. Gas has grown in recent years as a percentage of global energy consumption and is helping the world transition to a cleaner energy regime. At the same time, it is intensifying the contest for and control of gas-transit routes. Russia, the world’s second-largest producer, has built new pipelines to Europe since 2006 in order to diversify its flow from relying on Ukraine, while the USA, the world’s largest gas producer, is increasingly exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) through sea routes mostly controlled by the US navy. We argue that geostrategic calculations will more profoundly affect gas transit in the future and that countries that rely solely on market or commercial factors for their gas-transit security will become increasingly vulnerable to geopolitical volatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.iea.org/topics/energysecurity/whatisenergysecurity/

  2. 2.

    For an example of how states define and ensure their national critical infrastructure security, see the webpage of the US Department of Homeland Security: https://www.dhs.gov/what-critical-infrastructure

References

  • Adamson DM (1985) Soviet gas and European security. Energy Policy 13(1):13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akdemir OI (2011) Global energy circulation, Turkey’s geographical location and petropolitics. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 19:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aktürk AA (2008) Turkey as a hub for transit projects. Energy Charter Secretariat. https://energycharter.org/fileadmin/DocumentsMedia/Events/20080619Mashreq_Gas_Initiative_S3_AAAkturk.pdf,_June_19/3.3. Accessed 5 August 2018

  • Alam S (2002) Pipeline politics in the Caspian Sea Basin. Strateg Anal 26(1):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyev H (1998) Dünya siyasetinde Azerbaycan petrolü. Sabah Kitapları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan-Ayaydin Ö, Khagleeva I (2014) Geopolitical Market Concentration (GMC) risk of Turkish crude oil and natural gas imports. In: Perspectives on energy risk. Springer, Berlin, pp 103–117

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Austvik OG (2016) The Energy Union and security-of-gas supply. Energy Policy 96:372–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austvik OL, Rzayeva G (2017) Turkey in the geopolitics of energy. Energy Policy 107:539–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydın M (2001) Geopolitics of Central Asia and the Caucasus; continuity and change since the end of the Cold War. Turkish Yearb Intl Rel 32:167–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın M (2004) Oil, pipelines and security; geopolitics of the Caspian Region. In: Gammer M (ed) The Caspian Region; a re-emerging region, vol I. Routledge, New York, pp 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahgat G (2005) Energy security: The Caspian Sea. Miner Energy Raw Mater Rep 20(2):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin D (1997) The concept of security. Rev Int Stud 23:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmaceda MM (1998) Gas, oil and the linkages between domestic and foreign policies: the case of Ukraine. Eur Asia Stud 50(2):257–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin M (2010) Turkey’s energy strategy: what difference does it make to become an energy transit corridor, HUB or center? UNISCI Discussion Papers 23:113–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzarovski S (2009) East-Central Europe’s changing energy landscapes: a place for geography. Area 41(4):452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlus JV (2013) Connecting midstream: the politics and economics of oil transportation in the Middle East. D. Phil. thesis, Georgetown University

    Google Scholar 

  • BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2018). https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-full-eport.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2018

  • Burges D (2013) Cargo theft, loss prevention, and supply chain security. Heinemann, Butterworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilde J (1998) Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzek J (2011) Speech by Professor Jerzy Buzek, President of the European Parliament: “European energy alliance”. First Annual Congress, Brussels, 2.4.2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert K (2016) From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’: perspectives on a fertile academic borderland. Prog Hum Geogr 40(1):105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman JD (1967) Manners, Gerald. The geography of energy. London, Hutchinson University Library, 1964. 205 pages. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec 11(24):591–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherp A, Jewell J (2014) The concept of energy security: beyond four A’s. Energy Policy 75:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chester L (2010) Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature. Energy Policy 38:887–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A (2006) The North European gas pipeline threatens Europe’s energy security. The Heritage Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Correlje A, Van de Linde C (2006) Energy supply security and geopolitics: a European perspective. Energy Policy 34:532–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancy JR, Dancy VA (2017) Terrorism and oil & gas pipeline infrastructure: vulnerability and potential liability for cybersecurity attacks. Oil Gas Nat Resour Energy J 2(6):579–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Castri T (2014) Pipe dreams: rethinking petroleum pipelines past and present. MPhil Thesis, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University

    Google Scholar 

  • Ediger VŞ (2007) Energy supply security and its relationship with national security. In: Energy supply security. SAREM Publications, Ankara, pp 1–47. In Turkish with English Abstract

    Google Scholar 

  • Ediger VŞ (2011a) Energy transition periods: lessons learnt from the past. In: The oil era: emerging challenges. ECSSR (The Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research) Publications, Abu Dhabi, pp 175–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Ediger VŞ (2011b) New world order in energy and Turkey. Akademi Forumu No. 67, Ankara, TÜBA-Turkish Academy of Sciences. [In Turkish]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ediger VŞ, Berk İ (2018) Geostrategic challenges in the oil and gas sectors. In: Dorsman A, Ediger VŞ, Karan MB (eds) Energy economics, finance, and geostrategy. Springer, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Ediger VŞ, Bowlus JV (2019) A farewell to King Coal: geopolitics, energy security, and the transition to oil. Hist J 62(2):427–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Charter Secretariat (2015) International energy security: common concept for energy producing, consuming and transit countries

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament and the council, European energy security strategy. Brussels, 28.5.2014 COM(2014) 330 final. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/european-energy-security-strategy.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2018

  • Eurostat (2018) EU imports of energy products – recent developments. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/46126.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2018

  • Francés GE (2011) Market or geopolitics? The Europeanization of EU’s energy corridors. Int J Energy Sect Manage 5(1):39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graaf VT, Colgan JD (2017) Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Energy Res Soc Sci 24:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigas A (2017) The new geopolitics of natural gas. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grubliauskas J (2014) NATO’s energy security agenda. NATO Review. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2014/nato-energy-security-running-onempty/natoenergy-security-agenda/en/index.htm

  • Hancock KJ, Vivoda V (2014) International political economy: a field born of the OPEC crisis returns to its energy roots. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J (2016) Does Russia have a potent gas weapon. In: Van de Graaf T, Sovacool BK, Ghosh A, Kern F, Klare MT (eds) The Palgrave handbook of international political economy. Palgrave Macmillon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Heather P (2012) Lessons from the February 2012 European gas “crisis”. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry R, Osowski C, Chalk P, Bartis JT (2012) Prologue, promoting international energy security 3, Sea-lanes to Asia. RAND Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhausen C et al (2005) Transporting Russian gas to Western Europe – a simulation analysis. Energy J 26(2):49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Högselius P (2012) Red gas: Russia and the origins of European energy dependence. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry GJ (1986) The irony of state strength: comparative responses to the oil shocks in the 1970s. Int Organ 40(1):105–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell P (2007) Paul Isbell revisits the energy security debate, Oxford Energy Forum, November, p 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentleson B (1986) Pipeline politics: the complex political economy of east-west energy trade. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonchère JP (2001) Gas/power synergy: a least-cost and environmentally sensitive option. J Energy Dev 25(2):259–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardaş Ş (2012) Turkey-Russia energy relations: the limits of forging cooperation through economic interdependence. Int J 67(1):81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger HA (1982) Years of upheaval. Little, Brown and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononenko V (2009) Russia: strategic loneliness. The World Today 65(7):23–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacevic A (2009) The impact of the Russia–Ukraine gas crisis in South Eastern Europe. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss C (2018) Cyberattack shows vulnerability of gas pipeline network. New York Times, 4 April 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/business/energyenvironment/pipelinecyberattack.html

  • Lawal MO (2001) Historical development of the pipeline as a mode of transportation. Geograph Bull 43(2):91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Arcas R (2015) How governing international trade in energy can enhance EU Energy Security. Renew Energy Law Policy Rev 6(3):202–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Arcas R, Peykova M, Choudhury T, Makhaul M (2015) Energy transit intergovernmental agreements on oil and gas transit pipelines. Renew Energy Law Policy Rev 6(2):122–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann TC (2017) The geopolitics of global energy: the new cost of plenty. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Licklider R (1988) The power of oil: the Arab oil weapon and the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, and the United States. Int Stud Q 32(2):205–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H (2003) Pipeline engineering. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft G, Korin A (2009) Realism and idealism in the energy security debate. In: Luft G, Korin A (eds) Energy security challenges for the 21st century: a reference handbook. ABC-CLIO LLC, Santa Barbara, CA, pp 335–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Luten DB (1971) The economic geography of energy. Sci Am 225(3):164–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mañé-Estrada A (2006) European energy security: towards the creation of the geo-energy space. Energy Policy 34:3773–3786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MENR-Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of Turkey (2014) 2015–2019 Strategic Plan. http://www.enerji.gov.tr/File/?path=ROOT%2f1%2fDocuments%2fStratejik%20Pla%2fETKB%202015-2019%20Stratejik%20Plani.pdf

  • Mills R (2016) Risky routes: energy transit in the Middle East. Brookings Doha Center, Qatar

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller B (2000) The concept of security: the pros and cons of expansion and contraction. Working paper. Copenhagen Peace Research Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell PR (1980) Geography and energy. Area 12(1):86–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Offenberg P (2016) The European neighbourhood and The EU’s security of supply with natural gas, Jacques Delors Institute, Berlin, Policy Papers

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir V, Yavuz HB, Tokgöz E (2015) The Trans-Anatolian Pipeline (TANAP) as a unique project in the Eurasian gas network: a comparative analysis. Util Policy 37:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamir N (2009) Turkey: a case of a transit state. In: Luft G, Korin A (eds) Energy security challenges for the 21st century: a reference handbook. ABC-CLIO LLC, Santa Barbara, CA, pp 250–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualetti MJ (2011) The geography of energy and the wealth of the world. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(4):971–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paust JJ, Blaustein AP (1974) The Arab oil weapon; a threat to international peace. Am J Int Law 68(3):410–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirani S, Henderson J, Honore A, Rogers H, Yafimava K (2014) What the Ukraine crisis means for gas markets. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Raszewski S (2013) The weakest link?: Hedging energy security challenges and opportunities within the Eastern neighborhood. The Mediteranean and The Black Sea/Caspian Region, CIES Neighborhood Policy Paper 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J (2010) Turkey as a regional energy hub. Insight Turkey 12(3):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruseckas L (2000) Turkey and Eurasia: opportunities and risks in the Caspian pipeline derby. J Int Aff 54(1):217–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzayeva G (2018) Gas supply changes in Turkey. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Samsam Bakhtiari AM, Shahbudaghlou F (1998) OPEC and natural gas. OPEC Rev 22(3):185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl E, Westphal K (2017) European energy security reimagined mapping the risks, challenges and opportunities of changing energy geographies, SWP research paper, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • Selivanova Y (2012) International energy governance: the role of the Energy Charter, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, American Society of International Law 106, Confronting Complexity, p 394–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer B (2011) Energy politics. University of Pennsylvania Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples J (2012) Russo-Polish energy security relations: a case of threatening dependency, supply guarantee, or regional energy security dynamics? Polit Perspect 6(1):27–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddayao CN (1997) Is netback value of gas economically efficient? OPEC Rev 21(3):151–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalamera M (2015) The Ukraine Crisis: the neglected gas factor. Orbis 59(3):398–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2000) Energy in the twentieth century: resources, conversions, costs, uses, and consequences. Ann Rev Energy Environ 25:21–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolansky O (2004) Ukraine and Russia: an evolving marriage of inconvenience. Orbis 48(1):117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK (2012) Energy security: challenges and needs. WIREs Energy Environ 1:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK, Brown MA (2009) Competing dimensions of energy security: an international perspective, Georgia Tech, Ivan Allen College, School of public policy, Working paper 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens P (2000) Pipelines or pipe dreams? Lessons from the history of Arab transit pipelines. Middle East J 54:224–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens P (2008) Transit troubles: pipelines as a source of conflict. A Chatham House Report, http://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/108992

  • Tagliapietra S (2014) The EU-Turkey energy relations after the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP and World Bank (2003) Cross-border oil and gas pipelines: problems and prospects. Joint UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Program Report, https://www.esmap.org/sites/default/files/esmapfiles/03503.Cross_Border%20Oil%2and%20Gas%20Pipelines_Problems%20and%0Prospects.pdf

  • Van der Linde C (2004) Study on energy supply security and geopolitics. Final Report prepared for DGTREN. TREN C1/06 2002. ETAP Programme by Clingendael International Energy Program (CIEP)

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor DG, Yueh L (2010) The new energy order: managing insecurities in the twenty-first century. Foreign Aff 89(1):61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman J (2017) How the oil pipeline began. July 6, 2017, Nautilus (science magazine). http://nautil.us/issue/50/emergence/how-the-oil-pipeline-began

  • Walts KN (1979) Theory of international politics. Princeton State University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner C (2016) Central and East European diversification under new gas market conditions. Centre for Economic and Regional Studies HAS Institute of World Economics, Working paper 221:1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss AS, Bartis JT, Sawak CA (2012) Promoting international energy security, RAND Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal K (2009) Russian gas, Ukrainian pipelines, and European supply security. SWP Research Paper No 11. Berlin. https://www.swpberlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2009_RP11wep_ks.pdf

  • Wigen E (2012) Pipe dreams or dream pipe? Turkey’s hopes of becoming an energy Hub. Middle East J 66(4):598–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks TJ (1985) Geography and energy: the quest for roles and mission. In: Calzonetti FJ, Solomon BD (eds) Geographical dimensions of energy. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 497–510

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winrow G (2007) Geopolitics and energy security in the Wider Black Sea Region. Southeast Eur Black Sea Stud 7(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winzer C (2011) Conceptualizing energy security. EPRG Working paper 1123, Cambridge working paper in economics 1151. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/242060/cwpe1151.pdf;jsessonid=857D5705AC312A652AE7B589240E41F7?sequence=1

  • Winzer C (2012) Conceptualizing energy security. Energy Policy 46:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfers A (1962) National security as an ambiguous symbol. In: Wolfers A (ed) Discord and collaboration. Essays on international politics. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 147–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Yafimava K (2011) The transit dimension of EU energy security. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin D (2006) Ensuring energy security. Foreign Aff 85(2):69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yergin D (2008) The prize: the epic quest for oil, money, and power. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetter K (2014) Countdown to zero day: Stuxnet and the launch of the World’s first digital weapon. Crown/Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Energy and Sustainable Development (CESD), Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Volkan Ş. Ediger & John V. Bowlus

  2. Department of International Relations, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mustafa Aydın

Authors
  1. Volkan Ş. Ediger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John V. Bowlus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mustafa Aydın
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volkan Ş. Ediger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Finance, SBE, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    André Dorsman

  2. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Özgür Arslan-Ayaydin

  3. Louvain Finance (LIDAM) Louvain School of Management, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    James Thewissen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ediger, V.Ş., Bowlus, J.V., Aydın, M. (2020). Geopolitics and Gas-Transit Security Through Pipelines. In: Dorsman, A., Arslan-Ayaydin, Ö., Thewissen, J. (eds) Regulations in the Energy Industry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32296-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation