Skip to main content

Learning from Longitudinal Mammography Studies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019 (MICCAI 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 11769))

Abstract

When reading imaging studies, radiologists often compare the acquired images to one or more prior studies of the patient. Machine learning algorithms that assist in identifying abnormalities in medical images usually do not analyze prior images. This work describes a deep-learning classification framework for mammography studies, which incorporates prior image information using four approaches: (1) late fusion of prediction scores; (2) early fusion of input layers; (3) feature fusion combining a convolutional neural network (CNN) and gradient boosting trees; and (4) feature fusion using CNN and long-short term memory (LSTM) architecture. We demonstrate the advantages and limitations of each approach and compare their performance in identifying biopsy-proven malignancies in mammography screening studies. On an evaluation cohort of 439 patients, adding prior studies to the analysis improved the diagnostic performance of the classification framework. The CNN-LSTM architecture achieved the highest area under the ROC curve of 0.88, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.78, respectively. The methods that were trained using information from prior studies achieved better results than the baseline classifier, with up to 45% reduction in false-positive rate at the same sensitivity. The major advantage of the CNN-LSTM approach is in its flexibility and scalability; it allows to use the same network to classify sequences of multiple priors with variable length. The study demonstrates that longitudinal analysis of images can potentially improve the ability of machine learning algorithms to accurately and reliably interpret imaging studies, thus providing value to the radiology community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Austin, C., Rijken, T., et al.: The role of deep learning in breast screening. Curr. Breast Cancer Rep. 11, 17–22 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. J. Assoc. Phys. India 42(8), 785–794 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Geras, K.J., Wolfson, S., et al.: High-resolution breast cancer screening with multi-view deep convolutional neural networks, pp. 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hayward, J.H., Ray, K.M., et al.: Improving screening mammography outcomes through comparison with multiple prior mammograms. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 207(4), 918–924 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hochreiter, S., Urgen Schmidhuber, J.: LTSM. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kooi, T., Karssemeijer, N.: Classifying symmetrical differences and temporal change in mammography using deep neural networks, pp. 1–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kyono, T., Gilbert, F.J., van der Schaar, M.: MAMMO: a deep learning solution for facilitating radiologist-machine collaboration in breast cancer diagnosis (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lehman, C.D., Arao, R.F., et al.: National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the breast cancer surveillance consortium. Radiology 283(1), 49–58 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McNemar, Q.: Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12(2), 153–157 (1947)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Myers, E.R., Moorman, P., et al.: Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening. JAMA 314(15), 1615 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perek, S., Hazan, A., Barkan, E., Akselrod-Ballin, A.: Siamese network for dual-view mammography mass matching. In: Stoyanov, D., et al. (eds.) RAMBO/BIA/TIA -2018. LNCS, vol. 11040, pp. 55–63. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00946-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ribli, D., Horváth, A., et al.: Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with Deep Learning. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 4165 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roelofs, A.A.J., Karssemeijer, N., et al.: Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 242(1), 70–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Santeramo, R., Withey, S., Montana, G.: Longitudinal detection of radiological abnormalities with time-modulated LSTM. In: Stoyanov, D., et al. (eds.) DLMIA/ML-CDS -2018. LNCS, vol. 11045, pp. 326–333. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Sickles, E.A., d’Orsi, C.J., Bassett, L.W., et al.: ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., et al.: Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, N., Phang, J., et al.: Deep neural networks improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaked Perek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perek, S., Ness, L., Amit, M., Barkan, E., Amit, G. (2019). Learning from Longitudinal Mammography Studies. In: Shen, D., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019. MICCAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11769. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_79

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_79

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32225-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32226-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics