Abstract
The Multi-criteria Integrated Resource Assessment (MIRA) open solution approach is a framework and a process. MIRA is a transparent policy framework that embraces diversity, adversity, and discovery, with a process that allows for the policy-specific evaluation of Decision Uncertainty and the emergence of stakeholder agreement. The three major unique aspects of an open solution approach are the inclusion of Decision Uncertainty; stakeholder-directed, but structured, iterations of the Requisite Steps; and trans-disciplinary learning. Trans-disciplinary learning becomes key to ensuring that each iteration is informed by the previous. These components distinguish the open solution approach from conceptual social science approaches that lack methodologies to compare specific policy alternatives and the reductionist decision-analytic approach that is currently the dominant public policy making paradigm. In this chapter, the Requisite Steps as applied in a MIRA approach are described, including terminology and guiding principles specific to MIRA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Often, the differing levels of detail reflect the availability of data due to the limitations in knowledge, time, or expertise at the time of the analysis.
- 2.
Data metrics are those data that are either represented by a single datum or are constructed from more than one datum and are used to represent the stakeholders’ CN.
- 3.
While assessment of the compliance or attainment status of a county for ozone appears to be purely factual (i.e., whether an air quality monitor is measuring complying ozone readings), this assessment is complicated by many factors, including the lack of monitors in every county, the regional transport of ozone precursor emissions, and the atmospheric chemistry of ozone formation.
- 4.
Simplifying the EJS and VS for the Baseline Run allows stakeholders to focus on refining their PN, CNs, and CMs. Customization of their analysis with a non-uniform EJS and an unequal VS follows with iteration.
References
Groot A, van Dijk N, Jiggins J, Maarleveld M (2002) Three challenges in the facilitation of system-wide change. In: Leeuwais C, Pyburn R (eds) Wheelbarrows full of frogs. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 199–213
Benessia A, Funtowicz SO, Giampietro M, Guimaraes Pereira A, Ravetz JR, Saltelli A, Strand R, van der Sluijs JP (2016) The rightful place of science: science on the verge. Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Arizona State University, Charleston
Lawrence RJ (2010) Beyond disciplinary confinement to imaginative transdisciplinarity. In: Brown VA, Harris JA, Russell JY (eds) Tackling wicked problems: through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, London, pp 16–30
Röling N (2002) Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences. In: Leeuwais C, Pyburn R (eds) Wheelbarrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 25–47
Leeuwais C, Pyburn R (eds) (2002) Wheelbarrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen
Guijt I, Proost J (2002) Monitoring for social learning: insights from Brazilian NGOs and Dutch farmer study groups. In: Leeuwais C, Pyburn R (eds) Wheelbarrows full of frogs. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 215–232
Curtin CG (2015) The science of open spaces: theory and practice for conserving large complex systems. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Gunn JAE, Pope J, Retief F (2015) Managing uncertainty, ambiguity and ignorance in impact assessment by embedding evolutionary resilience, participatory modelling and adaptive management. J Environ Manag 151:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.030
Endter-Wada J, Blahna D, Krannich R, Brunson M (1998) A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 8(3):891–904
Isaacs W (1999) Dialogue and the art of thinking together: a pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life. Doubleday, New York
Bell S, Morse S, Shah RA (2012) Understanding stakeholder participation in research as part of sustainable development. J Environ Manage 101:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.004
Andrews CJ (2002) Humble analysis: the practice of joint fact-finding. Praeger, Westport
Webler T, Renn O (1995) A brief primer on participation: philosophy and practice. In: Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (eds) Fairness and competence in citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse, Technology, risk and society, vol 10. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 17–34
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Guideline for data handling conventions for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2015) National ambient air quality standards for ozone. Fed Regist 80(208):177
Saaty TL (1990) Multicriteria decision making: the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
Clean Air Act (1990) 42 U.S.C. 7407 et seq
Stahl CH, Fernandez C, Cimorelli AJ (2004) Technical support document for the Region III 8-hour ozone designations 11-factor analysis. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Philadelphia
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) Air quality designations and classifications for the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard; early action compact areas with deferred dates. Fed Regist 84(69):23858–23951
Corporate Finance Institute (2018) Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA). https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/trading-investing/dow-jones-industrial-average-djia/. Accessed 12/13/18
Susskind LE, Levy PF, Thomas-Larmer J (2000) Negotiating environmental agreements: how to avoid escalating confrontation, needless costs, and unnecessary litigation. Island Press, Washington D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stahl, C.H., Cimorelli, A.J. (2020). Introduction to MIRA, an Open Solution Approach. In: Environmental Public Policy Making Exposed. Risk, Systems and Decisions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32130-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32130-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32129-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32130-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)