Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

State of the Art Determination of Risk Management in the Implantation Process of Computing Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Emerging Trends and Technologies (ICAETT 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1066))

Abstract

Risk management is a vital step for software development projects to be successful. A systematic mapping study (SMS) to systematize the empirical evidence of methodologies, methods and standards that deal with risk management in software development projects is presented. Subsequently, a characteristics-based analysis (DESMET method) is conducted to evidence the degree of compliance of the analyzed methodologies regarding the risks for the computing systems implantation process. Finally, conclusions and future works are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Charette, R.: Why software fails. IEEE Spectr. 42, 42–49 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2005.1502528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhlamini, J., Nhamu, I., Kaihepa, A.: Intelligent risk management tools for software development, pp. 33–40 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1562741.1562745

  3. Johnson, J.: My life is failure: 100 things you should know to be a successful project leader. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Menezes Jr, J., et al.: Defining indicators for risk assessment in software. De Procedia Comput. Sci. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sommerville, I.: Ingeniería de Software. Pearseon, Madrid (2006). SBN:84-7829-074-5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caballero, S., Kuna, H.D.: Análisis y gestión de riesgo en proyectos software. In: XX Workshop de Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación (WICC 2018). Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (2018). ISBN 978-987-3619-27-4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Panizzi, M., Bertone R., Hossian A., Proceso de Implantación de Sistemas Informáticos – Identificación de vacancias en Metodologías Usuales. In: Libro de actas de la V Conferencia Iberoamericana de Computación Aplicada, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal (2017). ISBN 978-989-8533-70-8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kimer, T: Software engineering techniques: design for quality. In: IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 227 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, D.L.: Risk management and the small software projects (2009). http://www.sei.cmu.edu/iprc/sepg2006/johnson.pdf

  10. Liu, D., Wang, Q., Xiao, J.: The role of software process simulation modeling in software risk management: a systematic review. In: 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement), pp. 302–311 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/esem.2009.5315982

  11. Bertone, R.A., Thomas, P.J., Taquias, D., Pardo, S.: Herramienta para la Gestión de Riesgos en proyectos de software. In: XVI Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación, pp. 567–576 (2010). http://hdl.handle.net/10915/19289

  12. Panizzi, M., Bertone, R., Hossian, A.: Propuesta de un Modelo de Proceso de Implantación de Sistemas Informáticos (MoProIMP). In: Libro de Actas del XXIV Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación (CACIC 2018). Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (2018). ISBN: 978-950-658-472-6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marcela, G.B., José, C.-L., Mario, P.V.: Métodos de investigación en ingeniería del software. Editorial Ra-Ma (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kitchenham, B., Dyba, T., Jorgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, Washington DC, USA, pp. 273–281 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017: International Organization for Standardization (2017). https://www.iso.org/standard/63712.html

  16. CMMI Institute: «Capability maturity model integration» (2010). https://cmmiinstitute.com/

  17. Project Management Institute (2013). https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards

  18. Software Engineering Institute: «Software risk evaluation method» (1999). https://resources.sei.cmu.edu/asset_files/TechnicalReport/1999_005_001_16799.pdf

  19. Kitchenham, B., Linkman, S., Law, D.T.: DESMET: a method for evaluating software engineering methods and tools, Keele University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Portal de administración electrónica: «MAGERIT v.3: Metodología de Análisis y Gestión de Riesgos de los Sistemas de Información» (2012). https://administracionelectronica.gob.es/pae_Home/pae_Documentacion/pae_Metodolog/pae_Magerit.html

  21. Pablo, V., Marisa, P., Rodolfo, B.: Estimación del esfuerzo del proceso de implantación de software basada en el método de puntos de caso de uso. In: Libro de Actas del 6to. Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Informática/Sistemas de Información (CoNaIISI 2018). Simposio de Ingeniería de Sistemas y de Software. Mar del Plata, Argentina (2018). ISSN: 2347-0372

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ortiz Felipe. Reporte Técnico Nro. 1. Trabajo de Especialidad en Ingeniería en Sistemas de Información. Establecimiento del estado del arte de la gestion de riesgos en el proceso de implantación de sistemas informtáicos. Publicado en: ria.utn.ar/ handle/123456789/1841

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems Engineering. Graduate School, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Regional Buenos Aires, Av. Castro Barros 91 (C1178AAA), Caba, Argentina

    Felipe Ortiz, Mauricio Dávila & Marisa Panizzi

  2. Department of Information Systems Engineering, Facultad Regional Buenos Aires, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Av. Medrano 951 (C1179AAQ), Caba, Argentina

    Mauricio Dávila & Marisa Panizzi

  3. Institute of Computing Research- III-LIDI. School of Computing, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), 50 and 120, La Plata, Argentina

    Rodolfo Bertone

Authors
  1. Felipe Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mauricio Dávila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marisa Panizzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rodolfo Bertone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felipe Ortiz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands

    Miguel Botto-Tobar

  2. Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo, Babahoyo, Ecuador

    Joffre León-Acurio

  3. Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Angela Díaz Cadena

  4. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Profesional, Babahoyo, Los Rios Province, Ecuador

    Práxedes Montiel Díaz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ortiz, F., Dávila, M., Panizzi, M., Bertone, R. (2020). State of the Art Determination of Risk Management in the Implantation Process of Computing Systems. In: Botto-Tobar, M., León-Acurio, J., Díaz Cadena, A., Montiel Díaz, P. (eds) Advances in Emerging Trends and Technologies. ICAETT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1066. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32022-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation