Abstract
Social enterprises that intend to scale through a market approach must incorporate both an impact logic and a financing logic into their organizational culture. A “logic” is a way of seeing the world. Employees of social enterprises use different logics when arguing for or against a scaling strategy—some may adhere to an impact logic, while others adhere to a financing logic. It becomes challenging for social entrepreneurs when those arguments between employees who adhere to different logics become intense, with belief standing against belief. The more social entrepreneurs intend to scale, the stronger the risk of conflicts between different logics. The reason is that the importance of the financial logic rises and, thus, so does the need to integrate this logic with the impact logic of their mission. The social entrepreneur’s challenge is to balance the social and/or environmental logic that drives the enterprise’s mission with the financing logic that enables it to scale. Social entrepreneurs work on this integration based on three elements that need to be analyzed: mission, leadership, and communication.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Authors: Urs Jäger, Associate Professor INCAE Business School and Academic Director VIVA Idea; and Silke Bucher, Assistant Professor INCAE Business School.
References
Chia, R. (1996). Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Friedman, A., & Phillips, M. (2004). Balancing strategy and accountability: A model for the governance of professional associations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(2), 187–204.
Kreutzer, K., & Jäger, U. (2010). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 634–661.
Jäger, U. (2010). Managing social businesses. Mission, governance, strategy and accountability. Houndsmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Speckbacher, G. (2008). Nonprofit versus corporate governance: An economic approach. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(3), 295–320.
Schröer, A., & Jäger, U. (2015). Beyond balancing? A research agenda on leadership in hybrid organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 45(3), 1–22.
Jäger, U., & Beyes, T. (2010). Strategizing in NPOs. A case study on the practice of organizational change between social mission and economic rationale. Voluntas, 21(1), 82–100.
FUNDES International. (2005). 20 years promoting SME development in Latin America. San Antonio de Belén: Stocker Group SA. www.fundes.org. October 2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jäger, U., Symmes, F., Cardoza, G. (2020). Phase III: Integrating Financing and Impact Logics. In: Scaling Strategies for Social Entrepreneurs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31160-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31160-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31159-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31160-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)