Skip to main content

Unsupervised Discovery of Corroborative Paths for Fact Validation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019 (ISWC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11778))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Any data publisher can make RDF knowledge graphs available for consumption on the Web. This is a direct consequence of the decentralized publishing paradigm underlying the Data Web, which has led to more than 150 billion facts on more than 3 billion things being published on the Web in more than 10,000 RDF knowledge graphs over the last decade. However, the success of this publishing paradigm also means that the validation of the facts contained in RDF knowledge graphs has become more important than ever before. Several families of fact validation algorithms have been developed over the last years to address several settings of the fact validation problems. In this paper, we consider the following fact validation setting: Given an RDF knowledge graph, compute the likelihood that a given (novel) fact is true. None of the current solutions to this problem exploits RDFS semantics—especially domain, range and class subsumption information. We address this research gap by presenting an unsupervised approach dubbed COPAAL, that extracts paths from knowledge graphs to corroborate (novel) input facts. Our approach relies on a mutual information measure that takes the RDFS semantics underlying the knowledge graph into consideration. In particular, we use the information shared by predicates and paths within the knowledge graph to compute the likelihood of a fact being corroborated by the knowledge graph. We evaluate our approach extensively using 17 publicly available datasets. Our results indicate that our approach outperforms the state of the art unsupervised approaches significantly by up to 0.15 AUC-ROC. We even outperform supervised approaches by up to 0.07 AUC-ROC. The source code of COPAAL is open-source and is available at https://github.com/dice-group/COPAAL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://lodstats.aksw.org/.

  2. 2.

    See https://lod-cloud.net/ for data on the growth of the Linked Open Data Cloud.

  3. 3.

    http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/.

  4. 4.

    We use \(\sqcap \) to denote the conjunction of classes. Note that given that President \(\sqsubseteq \) Person \(\sqsubseteq \) Agent, we could write the type BarackObama in an abbreviated form. Similar considerations holds for the type of UnitedStates. We chose to write the types out to remain consistent with the output of our example knowledge graph, DBpedia 2016-10.

  5. 5.

    Preliminary experiments suggest a 20-fold increase in runtime without any significant increase in AUC-ROC.

  6. 6.

    If D(p) or R(p) are not available, the types of the given subject or object will be used, respectively.

  7. 7.

    https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.

  8. 8.

    We are aware that the terminology (especially concept similarity scores) used in \(\texttt {G}\) can potentially inform the fact validation process further. Studying the integration of assertional and terminological information will be the object of future work and is out of the scope of this paper.

  9. 9.

    We used Virtuoso and Fuseki for our experiments and our runtime findings support [7].

  10. 10.

    http://downloads.dbpedia.org/2016-10/.

  11. 11.

    All the datasets and result files can be found at https://hobbitdata.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/COPAAL/.

  12. 12.

    https://github.com/shiralkarprashant/knowledgestream.

  13. 13.

    https://github.com/shiralkarprashant/knowledgestream/tree/master/datasets.

  14. 14.

    https://github.com/DeFacto/FactBench.

  15. 15.

    award, birthPlace, deathPlace, foundationPlace, leader, team, author, spouse, starring, subsidiary.

References

  1. Athreya, R.G., Ngonga Ngomo, A.C., Usbeck, R.: Enhancing community interactions with data-driven chatbots-the DBpedia chatbot. In: Companion of the the Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference, pp. 143–146 (2018). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Garcia-Duran, A., Weston, J., Yakhnenko, O.: Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2787–2795 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouma, G.: Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. In: Proceedings of GSCL, pp. 31–40 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciampaglia, G.L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L.M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Computational fact checking from knowledge networks. PloS One 10(6), e0128193 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: Inductive learning for the semantic web: what does it buy? Semant. Web 1(1, 2), 53–59 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galárraga, L.A., Teflioudi, C., Hose, K., Suchanek, F.: Amie: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 413–422. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gerber, D., et al.: DeFacto–temporal and multilingual deep fact validation. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 35, 85–101 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lao, N., Cohen, W.W.: Relational retrieval using a combination of path-constrained random walks. Mach. Learn. 81(1), 53–67 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann, K., Turhan, A.-Y.: A framework for semantic-based similarity measures for \(\cal{ELH}\)-concepts. In: del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A., Mengin, J. (eds.) JELIA 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7519, pp. 307–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, P., Song, Q., Wu, Y.: Fact checking in knowledge graphs with ontological subgraph patterns. Data Sci. Eng. 3(4), 341–358 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, M., Liu, Y., Zhu, X.: Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In: Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malyshev, S., Krötzsch, M., González, L., Gonsior, J., Bielefeldt, A.: Getting the most out of wikidata: semantic technology usage in wikipedia’s knowledge graph. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11137, pp. 376–394. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Nickel, M., Tresp, V., Kriegel, H.P.: Factorizing yago: scalable machine learning for linked data. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 271–280. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paulheim, H., Bizer, C.: Type Inference on noisy RDF data. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8218, pp. 510–525. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41335-3_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Röder, M., Usbeck, R., Ngonga Ngomo, A.: GERBIL - benchmarking named entity recognition and linking consistently. Semant. Web 9(5), 605–625 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi, B., Weninger, T.: Discriminative predicate path mining for fact checking in knowledge graphs. Knowl.-Based Syst. 104, 123–133 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shiralkar, P., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., Ciampaglia, G.L.: Finding streams in knowledge graphs to support fact checking. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 859–864. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Socher, R., Chen, D., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.: Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.,pp. 926–934 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 16th InternationalCconference on World Wide Web, pp. 697–706. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, Y., Han, J., Yan, X., Yu, P.S., Wu, T.: Pathsim: meta path-based top-k similarity search in heterogeneous information networks. Proc. VLDB Endow. 4(11), 992–1003 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Syed, Z.H., Röder, M., Ngonga Ngomo, A.C.: Factcheck: Validating rdf triples using textual evidence. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1599–1602. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Feng, J., Chen, Z.: Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In: Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yin, X., Han, J., Philip, S.Y.: Truth discovery with multiple conflicting information providers on the web. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 20(6), 796–808 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, M., Chow, T.W., Zhang, Z., Li, B.: Automatic image annotation via compact graph based semi-supervised learning. Knowl.-Based Syst. 76, 148–165 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the BMVI projects LIMBO (project no. 19F2029C) and OPAL (project no. 19F20284), the BMBF project SOLIDE (project no. 13N14456) and the EU project KnowGraphs (project no. 860801).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zafar Habeeb Syed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Syed, Z.H., Röder, M., Ngomo, AC.N. (2019). Unsupervised Discovery of Corroborative Paths for Fact Validation. In: Ghidini, C., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019. ISWC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11778. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30793-6_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30793-6_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30792-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30793-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics