Skip to main content

Translation of Antibiofilm Technologies to Wounds and Other Clinical Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Targeting Biofilms in Translational Research, Device Development, and Industrial Sectors

Abstract

Nearly 80% of global bacterial infections are associated with biofilm bacteria (Joo, Otto, Chem Biol 19:1503–1513, 2012). In contrast to planktonic bacteria, biofilms are a complex, organized bacterial community possessing a sophisticated protective armor, in the form of the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), which acts as a robust defense mechanism against eradication. Chronic biofilm infections affect 17 million people annually, and approximately 550,000 people die as a result of their chronic infections (Wolcott et al J Wound Care 19:45–50, 2010). The challenge with biofilm-related infections is that they cannot be adequately confirmed via diagnostic tests in the clinical setting, and, more importantly, they are intrinsically resistant to host immunity, antibiotics, and biocides. This renders current therapeutic options inadequate to successfully eradicate the infection. Next Science™ has applied novel material science methods to combat biofilm through its innovative Xbio™ technology. Xbio technology, which includes the proprietary product, BlastX™, works by disrupting the biofilm matrix and creating an environment that compromises the biofilm’s structural integrity. In doing so, the EPS can be broken down and removed, thereby allowing the pathogens within the environment to be targeted and preventing the biofilm’s reformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Joo, H. S., & Otto, M. (2012). Molecular basis of in-vivo biofilm formation by bacterial. Chemistry & Biology, 19(12), 1503–1513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolcott, R., Rhoads, D., Bennett, M., Wolcott, B., Gogokhia, L., Costerton, J., & Dowd, S. (2010). Chronic wounds and the medical biofilm paradigm. Journal of Wound Care, 19(2), p45–p50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Landén, N. X., & Li, D. (2016). Mona Ståhle.Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a critical step during wound healing. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 73(20), 3861–3885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Attinger, C., & Wolcott, R. (2012). Clinically addressing biofilm in chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care, 1(3), 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aziz-Abdel, M. S. (2014). Bacterial biofilm: Dispersal and inhibition strategies. SAJ Biotechnology, 1, 105. https://doi.org/10.18875/2375-6713.1.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frykberg, R. G., & Banks, J. (2015). Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds. Advances in Wound Care, 4(9), 560–582. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0635.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Flemming, H. C., & Wingender, J. (2010). The Biofilm Matrix. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8, 623–633.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Performance of the Massachusetts Health Care System Series: A focus on provider quality. CHIA Center for Health Information and Analysis, chiamass.gov.

  9. Bjarnsholt, T., Kirketerp-Møller, K., Jensen, P. Ø., et al. (2008). Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 16(10), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sen, C., Gordillo, G., Roy, S., Kirsner, R., Lambert, L., Hunt, T., Gottrup, F., Gurtner, G., & Longaker, M. (2009). Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and economy. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 17(6), 763–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall-Stoodley, L., & Stoodley, P. (2009). Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell Microbiol, 11(7), 1034–1043.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brooun, A., Liu, S., & Lewis, K. (2000). A dose response study of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 44(3), 640–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis, K. (2007). Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 5(1), 48–56.31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., et al. (1998). The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science, 280(5361), 295–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carroll, K., Hobden, J., Miller, S., Morse, S., Mietzner, T., Detrick, B., Mitchell, T., McKerrow, J., & Sakanari, J. (2016). Jawetz, Melnick, & Adelbergs medical microbiology (27th ed.). Shenzen: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim et al. (2018). Wounds, 30(5), 114–119. Epub 2018 February 23 (Biofilms Made Easy (wounds international) – Phillips; Skin and Wound Care 2013 – Kevin Wu; Wound Education Update Feb 2014 – Wounds UK Best Practice Statement)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snyder, R. J., Bohn, G., Hanft, J., Harkless, L., Kim, P., Lavery, L., Schultz, G., & Wolcott, R. (2017). Wound bioflm: current perspectives and strategies on biofilm disruption and treatments. Wounds, 29(6), S1–S17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Snyder, R. J., Bohn, G., Hanft, J., Harkless, L., Kim, P., Lavery, L., Schultz, G., & Wolcott, R. (2017). Wound Biofilm: Current Perspectives and Strategies on Biofilm Disruption and Treatments. Wounds, 29(6), S1–S17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryder, M. (2005). Catheter related infections – It’s all about biofilms. Topics in Advanced Practice Nursing eJournal, 5(3), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Data on file. Center for Biofilm Engineering at Montana State University. Next Science Report TR-10-12-004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mallefet, P., & Dweck, A. C. (2008). Mechanisms involved in wound healing. Biomedical Scientist, 52(7), 609.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Next Science website. http://www.nextscience.com

  23. Code of Federal Regulations. https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/overview/default.htm

  24. FDA.gov https://www.fda.gov/combinationproducts/aboutcombinationproducts/ucm101496.htm#CP

  25. Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation (De Novo). FDA.gov https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/howtomarketyourdevice/premarketsubmissions/ucm462775.htm

Download references

Disclaimer

Dr. Myntti has financial interest in Next Science and the technologies discussed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Myntti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Myntti, M. (2019). Translation of Antibiofilm Technologies to Wounds and Other Clinical Care. In: Williams, D. (eds) Targeting Biofilms in Translational Research, Device Development, and Industrial Sectors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30667-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics