Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Practices/Innovations Between University of Pretoria, Gauteng and University of Venda, Limpopo

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Universities have become crucial in dealing with environmental challenges facing the world. Their role is fundamental in addressing environmental issues firstly due to the impact that the institutions have on the environment and secondly due to their massive potential as custodians of education, research and community development. Their role in sustainable development has been reiterated through various global agendas with one of the latest being the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The role of education is mentioned in several SDGs especially SDG 4. This study was undertaken to unpack and understand the contribution of universities to Sustainable Development based on two South African universities with different histories and socio-economic contexts. The research was undertaken at the University of Venda, a former black university situated in the poor Limpopo province of South Africa and at the University of Pretoria, a former white institution located in Pretoria, the country’s administrative capital city in the Gauteng Province. The study focused on sustainable development initiatives employed in university operations, research and community engagement only. The scope of the research (especially time limitations) did not allow inclusion of initiatives in other university functions. Qualitative data collection methods were employed, such as interviews and site observations. Analysis of the data was basically through a comparative analysis of implemented initiatives based on quantity, stage of implementation, the focus and types of initiatives, and the scale of implementation. Critical realist structure/agency stratification of reality was employed as an analytic frame for further interpretation of the results to establish how these two strata influenced the sustainability initiatives at the two institutions. A number of practices were identified at each of the institutions. The practices however differed in terms of focus and the scale of implementation. The University of Pretoria has numerous partnerships in research which has led to fundamental developments in tackling environmental issues both in its context and other contexts. The University of Pretoria has also committed resources to making its operations more sustainable which can be seen in its water and energy management practices which are aimed at conservation. The University of Venda is restricted in its research outputs but has focused on addressing issues that affect its local community. Sustainable initiatives at The University of Venda are aimed more at resolving its lack of resources, developing ways to attain resources in a sustainable manner. The influence of structure was quite clear especially in terms of the scale of implementation and allocation of resources. The capacity of agents is then limited by what is possible or is given priority at the level of the structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abubakar IR, Al-Shihri FS, Ahmed SM (2016) Students’ assessment of campus sustainability at the University of Dammam, Saudi. J Sustain 8(59):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams J, King C, Hook D (2010) Global research report: Africa. Thompson Reuters, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  • African Union (2015) Agenda 2063. Available online: https://au.int/agenda2063/about. Accessed 01 Mar 2019

  • Allan J (2005) Apartheid South Africa: an insiders overview of the origin and effects of separate development. Universe, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshuwaikhat HM, Abubakar I (2008) An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. J Clean Prod 16:1777–1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg E, Plotkin S, Norden B, Hasson B (2009) Global learning for sustainable development in higher education: recent trends and a critique. Int J Sustain High Educ 10(4):368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer MS (1995) Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer MS (2003) Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer M, Sharp R, Stones R, Woodiwiss T (1999) Critical realism and research methodology. J Crit Realism 2(1):12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton T, Craib I (2001) Philosophy of social science: the philosophical foundations of social thought. Palgrave, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R (1978) A realist theory of science. The Harvester Press, Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst M, Rose P, Maurice G, Ackerman JD (2011) Achieving campus sustainability: top-down, bottom-up, or neither? Int J Sustain High Educ 12(4):338–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callewaert J, Marans RW (2017) Measuring progress over time: the sustainability cultural indicators program at the university of Michigan. In Leal Filho W et al (eds), Handbook of theory and practice of sustainable development in higher education, world sustainability series. pp 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47889-0_13. Springer International Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • China Green University Network (2014) Introduction to China Green University Network. Available online: http://www.cgun.org/content.aspx?info_lb=57&flag=57. Accessed 5 Oct 2017

  • DEA (2011) National climate change response white paper. DEA, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhlamini L (2017) Integrating agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into regional and national development plans and strategy. UNDP. www.za.undp.org. Accessed 27 Feb 2019

  • Ferrer-Balas D, Adachi J, Banas S, Davidson CI, Hoshikoshi A, Mishra A, Motodoa Y, Onga M, Ostwald M (2008) An international comparative analysis of sustainability transformation across seven universities. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(3):295–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillham B (2000) Case study research methods. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kros C (2010) The seeds of separate development: origins of Bantu education. Unisa Press, South Africa, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedy PD, Ormrod L (2015) Practical research: planning and design, 11th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Essex, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz-Sisitka H (2012) The event of modern sustainable development and African universities. GUNi. Available online: http://www.guninetwork.org. Accessed 14 Oct 2018

  • Lotz-Sisitka H, Hlengwa A, Ward M, Salami A, Ogbuigwe A, Pradhan M, Neeser M, Laurika S (2015) Mainstreaming environment and sustainability in African universities: stories of change. Rhodes University Environmental Learning Research Centre, Grahamstown

    Google Scholar 

  • Maponya P, Mpandeli S (2016) Drought and food scarcity in Limpopo Province, South Africa. In: 2nd world irrigation forum, 6–8 November 2016, Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu D, Jiang D, Li F (2010) Higher education for sustainable development in China. Int J Sustain High Educ 11:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyerere J, Mfune O, Fuh D, Sulemana N, Mutisya E, Yiran G, Fadairo O, Ameyaw J, Odingo A (2013) The role of higher education in building a sustainable African society. Afr J Sustain Dev 4(3):17–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph M, Stubbs W (2014) Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. High Educ 2:2–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9641-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan A, Tilbury D, Corcoran PB, Abe O, Nomura K (2010) Sustainability in higher education in the Asia-Pacific: development, challenges and prospects. Int Sustain High Educ 11(2):106–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SADC REEP (2011) Education for sustainable development and educational quality and relevance. 2nd year research report. Unpublished research report. SADC Regional Environmental Education Programme, South Africa, Howick

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer RA (2000) Realism and social science. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change. Available online: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/, http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/sternreview_index.cfm. Accessed 29 Mar 2017

  • Ueckermann I (2016) Water management plan: department of facilities management campus services. University of Pretoria, South Africa, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1993) The Swansea declaration. UNESCO. Swansea, Wales. Available online: https://www.iau-hesd.net/sites/default/files/documents/the_swansea_declaration.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2018

  • UNESCO (1990a) The Talloires declaration. UNESCO. Talloires, France. Available online: http://ulsf.org/talloires-declaration/. Accessed 17 Oct 2018

  • UNESCO (1990b) Kyoto declaration. Ninth international association of universities round table. Available online: https://iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/sustainable_development_policy_statement.pdf. Accessed 01 Mar 2019

  • UNESCO (2019) Global action programme on education for sustainable development. Available online: https://en.unesco.org/gap. Accessed 01 Mar 2019

  • Velazquez L, Munguia N, Platt A, Taddei J (2006) Sustainable university: what can be the matter? J Clean Prod 14:810–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weik E (2006) Working relationships: a meta-view on structure and agency. Available online: http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol7.1/weik.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2018

  • Wright T, Elliot H (2011) Canada and US regional report. In: Higher education in world 4, higher education’s commitment to sustainability: from understanding to action. GUNi, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mucha Togo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mukwevho, E.E., Togo, M. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Practices/Innovations Between University of Pretoria, Gauteng and University of Venda, Limpopo. In: Leal Filho, W., Tortato, U., Frankenberger, F. (eds) Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics